SECOND MEETING OF THE
HERITAGE
TOWN OF
Canada Room,
Members Regrets
Joan Natoli, Chair Maria Pia Andrejin
Ted Chisholm, Vice-Chair
Julie Christian
Elizabeth Plashkes
Marie Jones
Judy Dawson-Ryan
Evelin Ellison
Rosemary Lamon
Susan Casella
Councillor John Webster
Regional Councillor Jim Jones
R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning
G. Duncan, Heritage & Conservation Planner
Yvonne Hurst – Committee Secretary
The Chair convened the meeting at the hour
of
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (16.11)
HERITAGE
THAT the Heritage Markham agenda and addendum
agenda, dated
CARRIED.
2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
FIRST HERITAGE
Extracts: R.
Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning_________________
HERITAGE
THAT the Minutes of the Heritage Markham meeting held on
CARRIED.
3. HERITAGE
DESIGNATION
DESIGNATION RESEARCH REPORT -
JOHN CAMERON JR. HOUSE
BAYVIEW COUNTRY CLUB LTD.
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage
Planning_________________
The Heritage and
Conservation Planner advised that, as directed by Heritage Markham, staff have
researched the property at
Mr. David McKay, representing the applicant, advised that Bayview Country Club Ltd. was initially unaware of the heritage nature of the building. The original application was to allow the owners to make changes to the maintenance facilities. Since becoming aware of the heritage aspects of the dwelling on this site, a revised site plan has been prepared preserving the heritage dwelling.
Mr. David McKay advised that the owner is willing to work with Town (Heritage Section) staff and has retained the services of an architect with heritage experience.
HERITAGE
THAT the presentation by Mr. David Mckay on behalf of Bayview Country Club Ltd. be received;
AND THAT the Building Evaluation Sub-Committee be directed to carry out an evaluation of the John Cameron Jr. House and report back to the next meeting of Heritage Markham.
CARRIED.
4. REQUEST
FOR FEEDBACK
6031 HIGHWAY 7(16.11)
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage
Planning_________________
Mr. Jerry Shoalts, Architect, was in attendance to discuss the proposed elevations for the Markham Village Library Expansion. He noted that a preliminary design and massing model was presented to Heritage Markham in October, 2004. At that time, Heritage Markham raised four issues for consideration: a) need and size of roof top mechanical equipment; b) materials to be used (colours, types); c) window treatment and d) use of quality materials.
Mr. Shoalts provided the following information related to these four issues. He noted that the mechanical roof platform had initiated concerns by Heritage Markham related to its size and appearance. He advised that indoor equipment has been researched and approved by the Building and Parks Construction Committee, which would result in roof top equipment not being required. He requested that Heritage Markham reiterate its concerns regarding roof top mechanical equipment so that a detailed business case can be presented to Council.
With regard to quality materials, Mr. Shoalts indicated that the best quality of materials within budget have been recommended.
He outlined a number of issues that will be addressed:
Existing
Building
- existing stucco will be repaired
- existing wood windows will be repaired
- replacement of all existing windows is not feasible within the budget
- existing wood lattice will be replaced by a new wood lattice installed on the face of the building (to discourage birds)
- existing roof to be replaced with new asphalt shingles (a metal roof was not an option within the budget)
- The existing north pedestrian access is currently not used and will be re-opened
New Addition
- windows will be bronze aluminium (maintenance concerns with wood windows) (aluminium will last indefinitely while the window glass would have to be replaced in approximately 15-20 years)
- new brick will be a buff colour to complement the existing brick (the original brick was not available) (stone was not an option within the budget)
- roof may be asphalt, however, a metal roof in warm grey is being recommended
- The window design is complementary to the existing structure
- A colour board will be presented to Heritage Markham when approvals have been given by Council
- The addition is the same width as the original building; massing is similar to the original model
- Operable windows to be included that will open approximately 4” to allow for ventilation of the building and assist in controlling the library environment
- As much natural lighting as possible has been provided to reduce the need for artificial lighting. When there is no need for electric lights they will automatically turn off to save electricity.
- Indoor mechanical equipment is more energy efficient than outdoor equipment
- The building will be well insulated
The Committee expressed some concerns with regard to the massing and style of the windows and suggested that the massing on the west elevation in particular could be broken into four banks instead of the proposed two banks. The Committee also asked if the existing front door would be a focal point. Mr. Shoalts answered yes, it will be reopened when the renovations are complete.
Mr. Shoalts noted that March 7th has been tentatively scheduled for a public meeting.
HERITAGE
THAT Heritage
Markham supports Town (Heritage Section) staff comments as outlined in the memo
dated
AND THAT Heritage Markham strongly supports the installation of interior mechanical equipment since the use of roof top mechanical equipment would be inappropriate due to its size and appearance on the roof.
CARRIED.
5. REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK
UNIONVILLE PLAYGROUND AND PARKETTE
146 MAIN STREET, UNIONVILLE (16.11)
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning
Ms. Linda Irvine
was in attendance to make a presentation on the proposed playground at the
Ms. Irvine noted
that the site supported by the majority of Unionville residents and businesses
who participated in the public process, as well as the Unionville Villager’s
Association, was the Fred Varley Parkette west of the Millennium
Bandstand. She noted that this site is
centrally located within Unionville, is near
Ms. Irvine advised that $75,000 has been committed to this project to date ($45,000 from community fundraising and the remainder by the Town). However, she outlined additional costs that would be required for excavation (resulting in a construction cost of approximately $175,000). She noted that when a consensus is reached on the location of the playground then funding remains the only issue to be resolved.
It was suggested that Heritage Markham focus its comment on the impact that the proposed structure may have on the Millennium Bandstand and what type of playground equipment would be more appropriate for the heritage area.
The Committee discussed the issue at length. Several concerns were raised including sound from the playground and its impact on events at the bandstand; site lines (would the playground structure impact the view of the bandstand); and design of the playground structure (would it complement the bandstand and the heritage area in which it is located?).
Mr. Richard Talbot, President of the Unionville Villager’s Association (UVA), advised that the Association has supported ‘in principle’ the proposed playground in the Fred Varley Parkette. He indicated, however, that he was not aware that a vote would be taken at a recent meeting and expressed concerns that there was no record of who voted. He also expressed concerns with the increased costs of constructing the playground at this location.
A motion was moved and supported by the Committee to permit Ms. Jeanne Ker-Hornell to speak to this item.
Ms. Ker-Hornell urged the Committee to consider a number of issues including: view of the structure in relation to the bandstand, noise from the playground; is a playground compatible with the Millennium Bandstand; suggested construction of the proposed playground in the corner of the parkette away from the bandstand; many community events that have space requirements are held in the area; suggested an area on Eureka Street that may be appropriate.
A motion was moved and supported by the Committee to permit Brian Roman to speak to this item.
Mr. Roman noted that all members of the UVA were notified of the recent meeting held to discuss the location and equipment for the proposed playground. He advised that the process to have a playground constructed was started 4 years ago. The Unionville Gala initially raised $50,000 but provided this money to fund landscaping for the Millennium Bandstand. The Gala then raised $45,000 and this money is intended to fund the proposed playground. It was agreed that with community support, consensus with respect to the location and TRCA approval, the Unionville Gala committee would provide funds to assist with this project.
A motion was moved and supported by the Committee to permit Greg McCormick, of the Unionville BIA to speak to this item.
Mr. McCormick, Unionville BIA, advised that the BIA were a major supporter of the Millennium Bandstand and playground. He noted that over 125 performances have been held at the bandstand. He expressed concerns with regard to the site lines (visibility) from the street as this project is in the heritage area. He noted that the BIA supports construction of a playground in the area, however, he suggested that the scale of the equipment and colours should be addressed by Heritage Markham to ensure that these items are compatible to the heritage nature of the surrounding buildings.
HERITAGE
THAT the information regarding the proposed Unionville Playground be received;
AND THAT the Manager of Parks and Open Space be requested to take comments received at the Heritage Markham meeting of February 9, 2005 into consideration when finalizing her report on the proposed playground;
AND FURTHER THAT, the Manager of Parks and Open Space be requested to attend the next Heritage Markham meeting to provide an opportunity for further comment.
CARRIED.
6. INFORMATION
Extracts: R. Hutcheson,
Manager of Heritage Planning_________________
HERITAGE
THAT the information regarding the Main Street
Unionville South Streetscape Consultation be received.
CARRIED.
7. REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK
PROPOSED FAÇADE CHANGES
45
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage
Planning
G. Duncan, Heritage Planner______________________________
HERITAGE
THAT Heritage Markham has no
objection to the proposed façade changes to
- narrowing of the sidelights and addition of muntin bars;
- windows are to be wood, with exterior adhered muntin bars;
- exterior colours to be submitted for approval by Heritage Section staff;
- the applicant demonstrating that enough matching brick is available to carry out the design.
CARRIED.
8. SITE PLAN APPROVAL
APPLICATION
PROPOSED GARAGE ADDITION AND DECK
30
FILE NO. SC 05 007216 (16.11)
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager
of Heritage Planning
M. Seaman, Senior Heritage Planner__________________________
HERITAGE
THAT the applicant be requested to provide to Town (Heritage Section) staff and
Heritage
AND THAT Heritage Markham has no objection to the proposed design of the garage subject to it conforming to the requirements of the Markham Heritage Conservation District Plan and the inclusion of requirements in the site plan agreement confirming design, window type and design, materials, amendments to design during the construction process, etc.
CARRIED.
9. REQUEST
FOR FEEDBACK
HISTORIC BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
C.1910-20 (16.11)
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning
T. Yeung, Engineering Department
K. Bartusevicius, G.D. Jewell
Engineering Inc._______________
The Committee reviewed the suggested staff recommendation (new design of bridge to be complementary to the old, installation of a Markham Remembered plaque) and after some discussion it was indicated that the bridge should not be demolished due to its cultural heritage significance.
HERITAGE
THAT the information from the Town (Engineering Department) regarding the condition of the historic reinforced concrete bridge on 19th Avenue, west of Highway 48 be received.
THAT the
10. INFORMATION
DESIGN WORKSHOP
HWY 48,
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage
Planning_________________
HERITAGE
THAT the information regarding the Design Workshop, Highway 48, 16 Avenue to Major MacKenzie Drive, be received as information.
CARRIED.
11. CORRESPONDENCE (16.11)
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage
Planning_________________
HERITAGE
THAT
the following correspondence be received as information:
a)
b)
Built Heritage News – Issue No.
56,
c)
Architectural Conservancy of
d)
Heritage
e) Canadian Heritage (Federal Department) – 2005 Theme Calendar.
f)
Built Heritage News – Issue No.
57,
CARRIED.
12. REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK
PRESERVATION OPTIONS – JOSHUA MILLER HOUSE (16.11)
10192 NINTH LINE (16.11)
Extracts: R. Hutcheson,
Manager of Heritage Planning_________________
Due to time constraints the following recommendation was deferred to the March meeting of Heritage Markham:
“THAT although Heritage Markham would prefer to see the Joshua
Miller House retained, restored and tenanted on its original site as a first
option, or relocated and restored as a building available to the public at the
Markham Museum as a second option, given the current owner is unwilling to
pursue the first option and the Markham Museum Board has indicated that it is
not able to accept the dwelling and supports its transfer to Markham Heritage
Estates, Heritage Markham recommends that the Joshua Miller House be declared
eligible for relocation to Markham Heritage Estates.”
13. COMMITTEE OF
ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION
PROPOSED COACH HOUSE
237 MAIN STREET, UNIONVILLE HCD (16.11)
FILE NO. A 29/05
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager
of Heritage Planning
S. Muradali, Secretary Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment
HERITAGE
THAT Heritage Markham has no
objection to the Minor Variance Application A/29/05 to allow the construction
of a new garage with loft at
CARRIED.
14. REQUEST
FOR FEEDBACK
CALIBER HOMES
USE OF VINYL WINDOWS IN NEW HOMES
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage
Planning_________________
Due to time constraints the following recommendation was deferred to the March meeting of Heritage Markham:
“THAT Heritage
AND THAT the Architectural Review Sub-Committee meet
to discuss a review of the Town’s window policy for heritage districts in light
of recent development in the quality of non-wood windows.”
15. SPECIAL
EVENTS
HERITAGE EVENT PLANNING
(16.11)
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage
Planning_________________
Due to time constraints the following recommendation was deferred to the March meeting of Heritage Markham:
“THAT the memo regarding Heritage
16. OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL AND
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning
Ron Blake, District Co-ordinator___________________________
The Manager,
Heritage Planning, reviewed the application for Official Plan and Zoning By-law
Amendments for
The Committee supported a motion to permit the following Thornhill residents to express their concerns with respect to this issue.
Jerry Grassby,
Thornhill resident, noted that there has been a steady deterioration of
Bill Wylie,
presenting SPOHT (Society for the Preservation of Historic Thornhill),
distributed an artist’s sketch of historic houses on
Mr. Ricciuti
advised that he lives directly east of the proposed development. He noted that he wants the Town to uphold its
by-laws that do not permit this development in the area. He stated that he has serious reservations
with the proposed development and suggested that the Town of
HERITAGE
THAT the
presentations and correspondence received from Thornhill residents regarding
proposed residential and commercial development at
CARRIED.
HERITAGE
THAT Heritage Markham defer comment on these applications until the Thornhill Yonge Street Study and the Thornhill Heritage Conservation District Review Study are addressed by Council.
AND THAT Heritage
Markham be provided the opportunity to comment on the Thornhill Yonge Street
Study and Thornhill Heritage Conservation District Review Study before they are
endorsed by Council.
CARRIED.
17.
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning_________________
Due to time constraints the following recommendation was deferred to the March meeting of Heritage Markham:
“THAT Heritage
18. HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION
REPLACEMENT OF METAL ROOF WITH ASPHALT SHINGLES
MS. CINDY HONG
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning_________________
HERITAGE
THAT
Heritage Markham has no objection to the removal of the existing metal tile
roof at
AND THAT the metal roofing on the front porch enclosure also be replaced with the same asphalt shingles at the same time;
AND FURTHER THAT the owner of
CARRIED.
19. SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION
REAR YARD RESTAURANT PATIO
DUCHESS OF
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning____________________
HERITAGE
THAT Heritage Markham has no objection to the commercial patio at
CARRIED.
20. SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION
GARAGE AND REAR ADDITION TO AN EXISTING NON-HERITAGE HOUSE
SAM AND DEBBIE MADURI
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning
M. Seaman, Senior Heritage Planner
G. Duncan, Heritage
Planner_________________________________
The Heritage and Conservation Planner noted that a concept plan for
the proposed garage and rear addition was presented to Heritage Markham in
November, 2004. At that time the
Committee had supported the front yard garage owing to the unique circumstances
of the property and the fact that the front yard and garage will be well
screened from
HERITAGE
THAT Heritage
Markham has no objection to the Site Plan Approval Application for additions to
AND THAT as a condition of Site Plan Approval, the owner be required to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the Town of Markham for the long-term protection of the mature coniferous trees in the front yard that will screen the new garage from view;
AND FURTHER THAT Heritage Section staff be delegated authority to fine-tune design details.
CARRIED.
21. RESTORATION PLAN - JOHN REESOR HOUSE
H & R DEVELOPMENTS
6937 HIGHWAY 7 (16.11)
Extracts: R. Hutcheson, Manager of Heritage Planning
S. Heaslip,
District Co-ordinator________________________
HERITAGE
THAT Heritage Markham has no objection to the proposed restoration plan and site plan for the John Reesor House at 6937 Highway #7 subject to the following
conditions:
Overall
a) The stone basement entrance on the west elevation should be retained and restored;
b) The frame basement entrance on the west elevation may be removed;
c) The building is to be restored as per the approved elevations;
d) The design of the adjacent building on lot 216 should be articulated to be compatible with the character of the heritage house and submitted for review and approval by Town (Heritage Section) staff;
e) Trees should be planted to the west of the heritage house to provide for a softer transition between the new construction and the heritage house;
f) The elevation drawings should include notations specifying work to be undertaken;
g) The legal front of the property should be the north elevation. The building should be addressed off the street to the north of the building;
Windows
a) All historic windows are to be retained and restored;
b) Where original wood storm windows are missing, new wood storm windows should be manufactured for each window, which are consistent with the original (wood resembling a 2/2 pane division with a chamfered top where appropriate;
c) While repair and restoration of original windows is the first option, in the event that any existing windows have deteriorated, as determined by Town (Heritage Section) staff, replacement windows are to match the originals as wood, double hung with a 2/2 pan division and a chamfered top;
d) All window sills are to be retained and restored;
Shutters
a) All historic shutters are to be retained and restored;
b) Any new shutters are to match the specification of the original and be louvered wood and attached to the window frame with traditional hinges;
Veranda
a) The original bell-cast roof veranda is to be reconstructed to original specifications as documented on the historic photograph;
b) The veranda ceiling is to be sloped in a traditional manner;
c) The veranda posts are to be as per the approved elevations;
d) The Edwardian Veranda at the front of the building should be carefully taken down and any components offered to the Museum and the Heritage Markham Salvage Repository (e.g. columns);
Soffits and Facia
a) All soffits and facia are to remain as wood;
Roof
a) The roof is to be re-clad in traditional shingles. High grade wood, cedar shingles with a 4 ˝” weather are recommended;
b) The roof cresting should be installed as specified in the approved elevations;
c) The finial should be restored to original specifications;
Chimneys
a) The chimneys should be restored to original specifications and properly repointed;
Grading/Drainage
a) The drainage should be constructed to take water away from the house;
b) A sensitive transition should be implemented between the heritage house and the roadway which is slightly higher than the finished first floor of the house;
Servicing
a) The house is to be connected to all municipal services by the owner;
Siding
a) The wood siding on the rear addition is to be wood, board and batten with a traditional profile;
b) All battens on the house are to be chamfered battens;
a) The Owner is to provide and install at its cost a full-sized, baked enamel plaque outlining the history of the building according to the Markham Remembered program format;
Designation Plaque
a) The Owner is to permit the Town to install a bronze designation plaque on the building;
Garage
a) Details of the proposed garage design are to be submitted to Town (Heritage Section) staff for review and approval;
Fencing
a) The proposed landscape plan is to include a traditional low wood picket fence along the perimeter of the property;
b) The design of the fencing is to be submitted for review and approval by Town (Heritage Section) staff in conjunction with Town (Design Group) staff;
Adjacent Dwellings
a) The architecture of adjacent dwellings is to be complementary in style, materials and ornamentation to the adjacent heritage house;
b) Evergreen trees should be plated to the west of the heritage house along the property line with the adjacent new buildings in order to enhance the transition between old and new;
Security
a) The owner is to provide a Letter of Credit with the Town in the amount of $25,000 to be released upon completion of works outlined in the Site Plan Agreement;
AND THAT review and approval of final details and conditions is delegated to Town (Heritage Section) staff.
CARRIED.
The meeting adjourned at
Heritage
Minutes 2005-02-09