REPORT TO GENERAL COMMITTEE |
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and
Members of Council |
|
|
FROM: |
Alan Brown,
Director of |
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Lloyd Fernandes,
Senior Capital Works Engineer Allan
Arbuckle, Manager of Infrastructure and Capital Works |
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Highway 404
Mid-Block Crossing Between Highway 7 and Class
Environmental Assessment |
________________________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the report entitled “Highway 404 Mid-Block
Crossing between Highway 7 and 16th Avenue Class Environmental
Assessment dated June 20, 2005, be received;
AND
THAT the preferred alternative for the mid-block crossing as described in
this report be endorsed;
AND
THAT Town engineering staff be authorized, in conjunction with the Region
of York and the Town of
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to seek
Council’s endorsement of the recommended alternative for a mid-block collector
road crossing of Highway 404 between Highway 7 and
Mid-block crossings of Highway 404 were identified in
the Markham Transportation Planning Study 2002 (June 2002). The transportation analysis undertaken as
part of the MTPS indicated that crossings of Highway 404 would help to achieve
a balanced distribution of traffic demand by providing capacity to the network
without using all the available capacity of the adjacent arterial roads. This balanced distribution is important given
that significant congestion is currently being experienced during peak period operations
on the collector and arterial roads within the Highway 404 corridor. In addition, even with future improvements to
the area roadways as outlined in the Regional and Town capital road plans,
additional roadway capacity is required within the Highway 404 corridor to
accommodate traffic generated from the build-out of currently undeveloped
parcels of land and overall growth in the Region.
A mid-block collector crossing Highway 404 between
Highway 7 and
In March 2003 Council authorized engineering staff to
initiate an Environmental Assessment for a mid-block crossing between Highway 7
and
DISCUSSION:
Recommended Alternative
Three corridors
were assessed within the study limits. (Attachment “A”). Multiple alternatives have been analyzed for
each of the three corridor including overpass and underpass options, horizontal
and vertical alignments options, alternative connection options to the existing
road networks, number of traffic lanes
and intersection configurations.
The recommended alternative for the new mid-block crossing, which is illustrated in Attachment “B”, includes the following key components;
· A new four lane roadway including bike lanes connecting East Pearce Street in Richmond Hill to Centurian Drive in Markham
· An new overpass structure crossing Highway 404
·
The installation of new traffic
signals at the
·
Reconfiguration of the existing
storm water management ponds abutting
·
Relocation of the
This alternative provides a number of benefits over the other alternatives investigated including ,
·
Minimizes impact on existing and
future development on lands abutting Highway 404 within the Town of
·
Provides alternative access opportunities
for adjacent lands (GWL properties,
·
Provides a continuous collector
road from
Public Consultation:
The Municipal Class Environmental
Assessment process requires that a minimum of two contacts with the public be
provided. The first public consultation
centre was held on
The first Public Consultation
Centre, was conducted as an informal drop-in centre to
introduce the project, identify existing traffic operations in the area,
establish the need for improvement and provide justification for improvements
given forecasts for the 10 and 20 year horizons. In addition, the three corridors which were
identified for analysis and assessment were displayed. Project information including comment sheets
and contact names were available for review at the June 2nd meeting.
A total of nine members of the public signed the (optional) sign-in sheets and
a total of 10 comments were provided via email.
In general a majority of the comments received were positive with broad
support and acknowledgement for traffic improvements in the area.
Separate meetings
have also been held with individual property owners who would be directly impacted
by all alignments. In the case of the
recommended alignment, the two directly impacted landowners within the Town of
Markham, Seneca College and GWL Realty Adjusters, have expressed support for
the preferred alignment, in particular, with the ability of the preferred
alternative to improve traffic operations for existing users and the benefits
of improved property access for the undeveloped parcels of land in the area.
Upon completion of the report the ESR will be filed
for the mandatory 30-day review period in accordance with the Municipal Class
EA. The project schedule is to file the
report in early August 2005.
Property Acquisition Required
The recommended alignment as indicated in
Attachment “B” requires property from two adjacent
Other Area Network
Improvements
The recommended alternative will provide a connection to
In addition to the mid-block collector, engineering staff have been
investigating the potential for the construction of new roadways located opposite
the Highway 404 off-ramps at Highway 7 (Attachment “C”). The construction of a new roadway opposite
the easterly ramp (Road “A”)
would provide a direct
connection to the new mid-block collector road and will provide significant
relief for east and westbound traffic on Highway 7 between
Project
Schedule
The tentative schedule
established for the project calls for the preparation of detailed designs and
the acquisition of property in 2006 and construction in 2007/2008.
The costs of the project are to be shared equally between
the Town of
The estimated construction
cost of the mid-block collector roadway is $15,000,000 exclusive of property
costs and it is proposed that the Town of
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The Planning Department
has reviewed this report and their comments have been incorporated.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment “A”- Alternative
Corridors
Attachment “B” -
Recommended Mid-block Collector Alternative
Attachment “C” -
404 ramp extensions
|
|
|
Alan Brown,
C.E.T. Director of |
|
Jim
Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner
of Development Services |