|
REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE |
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services |
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, Director, |
PREPARED BY: |
West District Team |
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
RECOMMENDATION REPORT (OPA 1) File SD 03 106647 |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report entitled
“Recommendation Report: Thornhill Yonge
Street Study and Draft Amendments to the Markham Official Plan and Thornhill
Secondary Plan (OPA1),
That the recommendations
of Heritage Markham concerning the Thornhill Yonge Street Study, attached as
Appendix A, be received;
That Urban Strategies Inc.’s final report entitled “Thornhill Yonge Street Study, 2005: A Framework for Renewal, Reinvestment and Community Building”, distributed under separate cover, be endorsed as the basis for draft amendments to the Official Plan and Secondary Plan subject to the following clarifications and revisions recommended by staff:
That a Public Meeting be scheduled to consider the staff-initiated
amendments to the Markham Official Plan and the Thornhill Secondary Plan (PD
3-1), attached as Appendix B;
That the Thornhill Yonge Street Corridor be designated as a Community Improvement Project Area;
And that the draft by-law to designate the Thornhill Yonge Street Corridor as a Community Improvement Project Area, attached as Appendix C, be brought forward to Council, concurrent with the proposed amendment to the Thornhill Secondary Plan (PD 3-1).
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this
report is to summarize the results and recommendations of the Thornhill Yonge
Street Study undertaken by Urban Strategies Inc. (provided under separate
cover); to summarize and address the comments and recommendations of Heritage
Markham concerning the study; and to present a draft, staff initiated Official
Plan Amendment, based on the Thornhill Yonge Street Study and clarifications/revisions
recommended by staff, which will serve as a key document in the implementation
of the study.
BACKGROUND:
Study Area and surrounding
context:
The Thornhill Yonge
Street Study is a joint planning study undertaken by the Town of
Existing land uses
consist of a mix of commercial, retail, and medium and high density residential
uses on both sides of
By contrast, the established low rise residential neighbourhoods immediately east and west of the study area, with their rich inventory of well preserved heritage houses, exhibit an attractive residential character and form the core areas of the Thornhill Heritage Conservation District.
Study initiated to promote
revitalization of
The purpose of the Thornhill Yonge Street Study is to:
The study has also
informed York Region Transit’s work on the proposed Yonge Street
Transitway. During the course of the
study, municipal staff and the consultant team worked very closely with York
Region Transit to develop and enhance transitway cross sections and designs
that would be appropriate for and improve this section of the Yonge Street
Corridor.
Study Area incorporates part of the Thornhill Heritage Conservation District
The Study area overlaps a
portion of the Thornhill Heritage Conservation District, in particular the
properties fronting
Study Area characterized by
overlapping jurisdictions
The study area falls
within the jurisdiction of the Town of
Provincial Policies and new planning initiatives: The recent Provincial Policy Statement (2005), together with the Greenbelt Plan (February 2005) and the Places to Grow plan (2006) will shape future municipal policy directions and growth in the GTA. These documents are aimed at maximizing growth opportunities within existing urban areas through infill and intensification. Higher order transit corridors within urban areas are identified as key areas for intensification and redevelopment.
Thornhill Heritage Conservation District
Plan: The Thornhill Heritage Conservation District
was created in 1986 and is the Town’s oldest heritage district. The District was adopted pursuant to Part V
of the Ontario Heritage Act and the District Plan is adopted by municipal by-law. The overall goal of the District Plan is to
provide policies and guidelines in order to ensure the continuation and
enhancement of the district’s historical, village-like ambience while providing
for contemporary needs. Two of the
District’s objectives are to develop vacant building and redevelopment sites in
a way which will enhance the district’s character; and to ameliorate the
effects of
Town of Markham Official Plan (1987) and the
Thornhill Secondary Plan (OPA1): Both of these documents designate the lands
fronting Yonge Street north of John Street as Heritage Main Street Area; the lands
south of the existing townhouse development on the south side of John Street as
a Community Amenity Area and the existing townhouse development as Medium
Density Housing. A key provision of the
Heritage Main Street Area designation is to preserve the “historical,
village-like ambiance” of the Heritage Main Street Area. Within this designation, mixed use
development consisting of retail at grade and residential/commercial above is
encouraged; densities are restricted to 0.75 to 1.0 FSI; and building height is
limited to 3 storeys. On the Community
Amenity Area properties south of
Planned transit improvements will transform the
Yonge streetscape
York Region Transit
Staff has been successful in working with York Rapid Transit Plan and VIVA officials on the introduction of interim transit shelters and related street furniture that reflect the heritage characteristics of the heritage district. It is expected that this cooperative approach will continue when the new dedicated bus transitway and its associated infrastructure are being designed and implemented.
DISCUSSION:
A new vision for Yonge Street in
Thornhill Village
The Thornhill Yonge
Street Study envisions Thornhill’s main street transformed - from a somewhat
non-descript traffic artery into a vibrant, mixed-use main street with a
balanced mix of residential, retail and commercial redevelopment, and an
extensive and an integrated system of open spaces, public squares and private
gathering areas (see Figure 5). The
vision builds on Thornhill’s many strengths: its healthy residential
neighbourhoods, its strong heritage character, and municipal, regional and
provincial planning and transit initiatives.
Key elements of the vision and land use recommendations set out in the
study include:
Extensive public consultation
process
The study incorporated an extensive public consultation process including:
·
Visioning workshop on
·
A stakeholder group meeting on
·
A Public open house on
·
A business and commercial Property
owner “roundtable discussion” on
·
A second stakeholder group meeting
on
·
A second public open house on
·
A third public open house on
The Study was completed in four phases:
A comprehensive streetscape
improvement program
In addition to the land
use recommendations and proposed urban design guidelines, the study also
contains recommendations for streetscape improvements within the study area (see
Figure 6). The improvements are intended
to occur within the proposed 36 m. road allowance for
Within the 36 m. right of way, streetscape improvements include:
In addition, the study
recommends that building setbacks of a minimum 1.8 m from the
The study also recommends
enhanced streetscape treatments at three key intersections (see Figure 5): the Elgin/Arnold intersection; the John
Street transit node; and the Centre/Yonge Street intersections; and the
development of a “heritage art walk” (see Figure 7) on the east side of Yonge
Street south of John Street which, due to the reverse lotting of the existing
townhouses, provides no opportunity to develop street-oriented uses. The intent of the installation is to convey
the historic evolution of the
It is important to note
that a key element of the streetscape improvement program, particularly as it
relates to the proposed boulevard improvements, is predicated on the future
burial or relocation of the existing high voltage hydro lines along both sides
of
Community Improvement Area
The designation of the
study area as a Community Improvement Area under Section 28 of the Planning Act
would permit Council to target the area for a variety of specific enhancements
such as improvements to land, buildings, parking flow and streetscapes. Municipalities can also provide grants or
loans to property owners within Community Improvement Areas to assist in the
costs of repairs and improvements.
An integrated Open Space system
The study recommends the
incorporation of five new parkettes and open spaces within the study area (see
Figure 5): two at the Elgin/Arnold
intersection; one on the north side of
Comprehensive design guidelines
for redevelopment sites
The design guidelines set out in the study promote high urban design standards for future redevelopment and infill, in order to enhance the pedestrian and visual character of the corridor and to ensure that existing heritage resources are protected and enhanced by new development. The design guidelines address building heights; materials and design details; landscaping; parking, loading and access; and building massing, orientation and setbacks.
Implementation Strategy
The Thornhill Yonge Street Study sets out a detailed implementation strategy. Key elements include:
As a first step in the implementation process, staff have prepared a draft Official Plan and Secondary Plan Amendment, based on the land use and urban design recommendations set out in the study and clarifications/revisions recommended by staff. The draft OPA is attached as Appendix B. Staff recommend that a public meeting be scheduled to consider the policies contained in this document.
Study presented to Heritage
Markham and the Architectural Review Committee
Staff presented the draft
study to Heritage Markham on
The feedback indicates
that the study document contains many beneficial and positive proposals which
will enhance the future quality and amenity of the
a) the negative impact of further widening of
Comment:
It is also important to
note that the consultants and municipal staff worked very closely with YRTP’s
consultants to ensure that the impact of the proposed transit way would be minimized
and integrated into the heritage district to the extent possible. In this regard, the study team were
successful in negotiating reduced vehicle lane widths (3.25 m instead of the
typical 3.5 m width on Regional roads); reduced turning radii at intersections;
and, in the section of the proposed transit way between Centre Street and
Colbourne Street, where there is a reduced building to building distance
between the heritage buildings on the Vaughan and Markham sides of the street,
the study team were successful in negotiating a reduced right of way of 28
metres (vs. 36 metres elsewhere) for the transit way, in order to preserve the
heritage buildings and at the same time provide a reasonable pedestrian
boulevard at this very narrow point.
b) the Vision Statement does not explicitly mention heritage issues
Comment:
The Vision does address heritage issues.
Among other factors, the Vision “promotes protection for, and
enhancement of heritage resources and their environs” (p. 36). The concept plan illustrating the Vision also
identifies the heritage buildings within the study area. A number of key planning principles are also
identified which build on established municipal and heritage preservation
goals. One of these key principles is to
“protect and strengthen core assets-distinctive places and heritage resources”.
c) The maximum building height within the heritage district (up to 5
storeys) and proposed densities are not compatible with the preservation of the
village-like ambiance of old Thornhill
Comment:
Historically, building heights on
The study proposes a new
form of village environment which is greater in height and density. There are a number of reasons why the
consultant and staff support this approach, including:
·
a desire to use the mass and scale
of the building fabric to help narrow the perception of
·
a desire to encourage reinvestment
and offer development opportunities which will in turn improve the urban
experience and commercial strength of the area,
·
mixed retail-residential redevelopment appears to
be the most viable development typology based on existing market conditions,
but this requires a level of intensification to offset the land development and
construction costs and attract investment; and
·
a desire to achieve below grade
parking facilities, which is both expensive and necessary for most mixed use
redevelopment projects.
The real challenge will
be to ensure that the new infill is compatible with the heritage district’s
character and Heritage Markham will have an active role in this task. The Study does indicate that “new development
should both respect the past and the heritage context of the neighbourhood, and
foster a distinct main street character which is unique to Thornhill”. However, the Study’s Built Form Guidelines
promote “a healthy range of architectural expression and variation”. It is suggested that the recommendation to
endorse the Study indicate that in order to ensure that the new 3-5 storey
development is complementary to the character of the heritage area, that within
the parameters of the Study’s proposed Built Form Guidelines, new mid-rise
development be compatible with the basic tenets of traditional historical
commercial architecture typically found in an older downtown setting.
d) The effect of the Study might be to shrink the boundaries of the
heritage district
Comment: The Study and its recommendation do not in
any way propose to modify the boundaries of the heritage district. The study area focused on properties that are
primarily in commercial use fronting onto
It is suggested that the
recommendation to endorse the Study indicate that in reviewing public realm
streetscape improvements on
e) A portion of
Comment:
The Study focused on properties in commercial use and those areas that appeared
to have some intensification potential.
The
f) Increased densities will lead to traffic and parking infiltration into
the nearby residential neighbourhood
Comment:
The necessary parking requirements will be accommodated in underground
facilities and/or rear surface parking lots.
As with all new development, the impact on adjacent streets can be
monitored and if issues arise, appropriate restrictions can be introduced.
g) Fewer
Comment:
The elimination of individual driveway entrances on
h) The future of the
Comment:
The Study recommends a new “market square” in front of the Octagon Restaurant. Building on the tradition of the York Market,
the Market and other community activities are proposed to continue in a new
public square framed by existing and new mixed use development. This will create an attractive and permanent
home for the market, and a destination and amenity space for retail and leisure
activities throughout the week. A
collaboration would be required between the two affected land owners as part of
the private redevelopment of the site as it relates to parking.
i)
The proposal
that street furnishings are to be “timeless” in design rather than having a
heritage character
Comment:
The Study suggests that both loose streetscape furnishings and fixed street
furniture and lighting complement each other and be utilized throughout the
study area to create a cohesive and harmonious image. Black or dark grey is
recommended for the colour of these fixtures.
The Study does indicate that transit shelters, bus shelters and transit
information kiosks should be timeless, without evoking any period or style.
It is suggested that the
recommendation to endorse the Study indicate that all loose streetscape
furnishings and fixed street furniture and lighting (including transit/bus
shelters and kiosks) be reflective of and complementary to the heritage
character of the area.
CONCLUSION:
The Thornhill Yonge
Street Study contains recommendations for
appropriately scaled mixed use redevelopment and streetscape
improvements which will enhance the pedestrian quality and amenity of the
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The Study contains order
of magnitude cost estimates for the proposed streetscape improvements and a
recommended funding strategy. It is
important to note that the study sets out a long term master plan for future
redevelopment and streetscape improvements, and the cost estimates contained in
the study are preliminary and conceptual.
More specific cost estimates will have to be based on future detailed
streetscape and transit way design studies. A multi-year implementation strategy,
including partnerships arrangements, will be required.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Vegetation will be
affected by the proposed streetscape improvements, but this vegetation has been
assessed by staff to be of poor quality.
The proposed Art Walk on
ATTACHMENTS:
Figure 1 – Location Map
Figure 2 – Air Photo
Figure 3 – Study Area
Figure 4 – Transitway Alternatives
Figure 5 – Vision
Figure 6 – Proposed Streetscape Cross Section
Figure 7 – Proposed Heritage Walk
Appendix
A – Heritage
Appendix B – Draft Official Plan Amendment
Appendix C – Draft By-law to designate the Thornhill Yonge Street Community Improvement Project Area
|
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of |
|
|
File Path:
Q:\Development\Planning\Teams\WEST\Thornhill main street study\staff report\REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE.doc
LOCATION MAP: