Report to: Development Services
Committee Report
Date:
SUBJECT: Delegation of Council
Approval
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
That pursuant to
the provisions of the
And that the
By-law, attached as Appendix A be enacted by Council.
And that Staff be
authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this
resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Not applicable
Not applicable
1. Purpose 2. Background 3. Discussion 4. Financial
5. Others
(Environmental, Accessibility, Engage 21st, Affected Units) 6.
Attachment(s)
To delegate council
approval authority for alterations to properties designated under the
Council approval required under the “old”
Prior to recent
changes to the
In
In July 1991,
Council resolved that “where
In October 1991,
Council passed a resolution indicating that where
In November 1993, Council passed a resolution indicating that the requirement for Heritage Markham review and Council approval of “non-controversial” or compliant Building Permits and Heritage Permits for applications within the Thornhill, Unionville, Markham Village and Buttonville heritage conservation districts and study areas be delegated to the Commissioner or designate (Manager, Heritage Planning). In addition, the requirement for Heritage Markham review and Council approval of “non-controversial” or compliant sign permit applications in all Special Sign Districts (i.e. the heritage conservation districts) was also delegated to the Manager, Heritage Planning.
In 2002, Council
delegated the authority to approve plans and drawings in respect to Site Plan
Approval under the
The above Council resolutions allowed staff to streamline the approval of numerous applications which were compliant with existing policies and guidelines. This prevented applicants from having to wait 4-8 weeks for a report to be prepared and presented for Council approval.
Delegation of Council consent or approval authority is now permitted by the Heritage Act
During the consultation process for changes to the
Bill 60, An
Act to Amend the Ontario Heritage Act, which received Royal Assent in April
2005, now permits a municipal council to delegate its consent or approval
authority to a municipal employee or official.
The delegated authority can be for permits related to Part IV
(individually designated properties) or Part V (heritage conservation district
properties). The delegation by-law may
specify the alterations or classes of alterations that are delegated. Prior to enacting the by-law, Council must
consult with its municipal heritage committee.
See Appendix ‘B’ for the specific sections of the Ontario Heritage
Act.
Town should formalize the existing delegation
approvals using the Heritage Act provisions
The objective of delegation
of approval authority to a municipal staff member is primarily to streamline
the approval of compliant and non-controversial applications for alteration,
and to eliminate routine and administrative matters from Council’s agendas.
The opportunity
now exists to formalize the delegation of approval authority using the specific
and new provisions of the
Similar to the Council resolution of November
1993, the by-law also removes the requirement for consultation and review with
the municipal heritage committee (
The delegation of Council’s “heritage” approval does not relieve the applicant of the requirement to obtain other necessary approvals such as building permits or site plan approval.
Process for approval to remain basically unchanged
In
The proposed administrative process utilizing delegated approval to staff is summarized below:
1. Receipt of application for alteration to property
· Building Permit (eg. Construction of a porch)
·
· Signage Permit (eg. Commercial storefront sign)
· Site Plan Application (eg. Addition to a dwelling)
2. Circulation
and Review of application by
· Consultation with applicant if necessary
· Confirm compliance with policies/guidelines
3. Three Options
a) Manager,
· Forwards notice of consent to processor of application (i.e. for a building permit, the heritage consent would be sent to the Building Department to allow the permit to be issued once it meets any other Town requirements)
·
Provides a summary of all
decisions to
b) Application is forwarded to
(i.e.
situations were there is no policy to address to situation; situations where
there may be some local sensitivity; where
·
If supported by the Committee,
Manager,
· If not supported by the Committee, application is forwarded to Development Services Committee and Council
c) Application is not supported by Manager,
·
Manager,
·
Application is forwarded to
· Application is forwarded to Development Services Committee and Council
Refusal of proposed alterations and demolition requests to be sent to Council.
Any refusals of
applications to alter designated properties would still continue to follow our
current practice of review and recommendation by
Delegation should also include approval for grants
under the Commercial Signage Replacement Program.
Staff also
suggests that Council delegate authority to staff for the approval of grants
for commercial signage replacement in heritage districts to help streamline the
approval process. The maximum amount of
grant assistance available is $1,000. At
present, a staff report and Council approval is required which can take 6-8
weeks. It is recommended that upon being
satisfied that the eligibility criteria and other requirements have been met
and budget allocation is available for the program, the Manager,
The allocation of grants pursuant to the Commercial Façade Improvement Program will still require Council approval given that these projects are usually of a greater magnitude and often will require a choice between competing projects for limited funds.
Heritage
This matter was
reviewed with
Delegation of
approval authority contributes to achieving excellence in managing and
delivering quality services in an efficient and expeditious manner.
Legal Department
and
RECOMMENDED BY:
_ _____________________________ _____________________________
Valerie
Shuttleworth, MCIP, RPP
Director of
Appendix ‘A’ Delegation By-law
Appendix ‘B’ Extracts from the
Q:\Development\Heritage\SUBJECT\Delegation
of Approval\DSC April 17, 2007.doc