Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: October 16, 2007
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY: Balendra Sinnadurai, Engineering Technician, ext. 2608
Domenic Smarrelli, Traffic Operations Supervisor, ext. 4055
Sabbir Saiyed, Manager of Transportation, ext. 8120
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report entitled “
And that the attached by-law to amend Schedule
“C” of Traffic By-law 2005-188, pertaining to “Prohibited Parking”, by
including the south side of Ladyslipper Court, between Laureleaf Road and the
shared lot line of municipal addresses 33/35, be received;
And that the
And that the Parking Control Department be directed to enforce the
parking prohibition upon installation of the signs;
And that staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
The cost of labour and materials
to install these parking signs will be financed from the 2007 Capital Budget
account 083-5350-6503-005 . On-going maintenance costs for this installation
will be accounted for in future Operations Department budgets.
1.
Purpose 2. Background 3. Discussion 4. Financial
5. Others (Environmental,
Accessibility, Engage 21st, Affected Units) 6. Attachment(s)
This report proposes prohibited
parking on the south side of
Currently, a vehicular parking
prohibition exists on the north side of
Surrounding Area
Approximately 300 metres to the
west of
On these occasions, vehicular
parking demand has spilled over to the adjacent local residential streets. In
response to this, vehicular parking prohibitions have been installed on many of
the surrounding local streets such as Hunt Club Court, Prescott Court, Doncrest
Drive, Bayview Forest Lane, Proctor Avenue, and Laureleaf Road.
Earlier this year, the residents
of
Parking Study - Results
In response to resident concerns
regarding vehicular parking on
It was determined that
Vehicular parking on
To address operational and safety
concerns created by on-street parking,
Resident Survey
Because of concerns raised by the
Ladyslipper residents and the existing parking prohibitions on the surrounding
streets, the
A total of 41 households had the opportunity to vote and 28 households actually responded to the survey. This translates to a response rate of 68% which meets the minimum response rate of 30%. Of the 28 households who participated in the vote, 19 households are in support and 9 are in opposition to the proposed parking prohibition. The support rate is 67% which meets the minimum support rate of 60%.
Given the survey results, the
Parking Impacts From Places of Worship
The
Given the various challenges with
each of these measures for this particular site, parking spillover continues
onto
It is expected that parking spillover generated by Jaffari Islamic Centre will subside given that the religious institution will be relocating to a larger facility within two years. Until the relocation, congregation members will experience on-going challenges for parking.
Given the above, Staff and the
local Councilor will continue to work with the three places of worship to find
alternate parking solutions (e.g. offsite parking, commercial parking
structures and shuttle buses).
The Operations Department has reviewed this request.
RECOMMENDED BY:
________________________ ________________________
Alan Brown, C.E.T. Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P
Director
of
Attachment A – Proposed Parking Prohibition Map
Attachment B – Proposed By-law
Amendment