Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date:
SUBJECT: DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION 07 127018 DP
Single
Detached Dwelling
Markham Village Heritage Conservation District
PREPARED BY: Regan Hutcheson, Manager, Heritage Planning, ext 2080
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council refuse the demolition
permit application for the c.1865 dwelling located at
That the applicant be requested to work with Town staff and Heritage Markham to create an appropriate addition that will preserve the significant heritage attributes of the existing dwelling intact;
That the applicant be notified of Council’s decision as per the requirements of the Ontario Heritage Act;
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Not applicable
1.
Purpose 2. Background 3. Discussion 4. Financial
5. Others
(Environmental, Accessibility,
Engage 21st, Affected Units) 6.
Attachment(s)
To present information regarding an application to demolish a house within the Markham Village Heritage Conservation District, and to recommend that the application be refused.
The dwelling located at
The dwelling is a vernacular frame
dwelling, built with the influence of the Georgian Style and is believed to
have been constructed as a rental property by leading
The dwelling is listed as an ‘A’ building in the Markham Village Heritage Conservation District Plan signifying that it is a ‘heritage building’ having some historical or architectural value. The building was evaluated using the Town’s heritage building evaluation process and was rated as a Group 2 Heritage Resource – (Worthy of preservation).
The building located at the corner of
Albert and Edward Streets in
Original request for demolition initiated in early 1990s
The owners of the property have been attempting to demolish the dwelling since 1991. The following provides a brief chronology of events:
·
1991
– Staff visit the site as owner wanted to replace dwelling with reproduction.
· 1993 - Request to consider demolition submitted by owner to Heritage Markham. After a site visit, Heritage Markham recommended retention and incorporation into new development.
· 1994 – Request to consider demolition submitted by owner to Heritage Markham. After two site visits, Heritage Markham did not support demolition.
· 1995 – Request for Demolition submitted to Heritage Markham. Committee indicated no objection subject to advertising the building for relocation/salvage and approval of site plan/elevations for replacement dwelling. Council supported the recommendation subject to noted conditions.
·
1997
– Owner submitted applications to Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever
the lot and variances. Heritage
· 1998 – OMB allowed the appeal and did not grant the consent to convey or authorize the requested variances.
·
2000
– Owner presented a plan to Heritage Markham for feedback to construct 2 link
homes similar to the earlier proposal.
Heritage
· 2001 – Demolition application submitted
·
2002
–Heritage
· 2003 – staff was asked to examine opportunities to mitigate financial impacts if demo permit is rescinded. Staff met with the owner a number of times to review development options and possible financial relief. Council rescinded the support for demolition from 1995.
· 2004 – Request to re-consider demolition submitted by owner to Heritage Markham. Committee affirmed that dwelling to be retained, restored and incorporated into new dwelling.
·
2005 –
Heritage
· 2007 – Building Permit Application for Demolition submitted by new owner (Richard Wannop).
At its meeting on
House is located in the Markham
Village Heritage Conservation District
The house at 26 Albert Street is located
within the Markham Village Heritage Conservation District and is identified as
a Class ‘A’ (most significant) heritage property in the plan.
James Campbell House is a significant
heritage building
The James Campbell House, built c.1865,
is a significant example of a vernacular workers cottage, built with the
influence of the Georgian Style which was occupied by a number of prominent
local businessmen during its history.
The overall historic character of the house is largely intact and
although the house appears to have not been adequately maintained in recent
years, the building appears to be in no worse a condition than a number of other
vernacular heritage buildings, which have been successfully rehabilitated in
Using provincial standards, the property is of cultural heritage value
In January 2006, the Government of Ontario brought forward a regulation to assist municipalities in determining properties of cultural heritage value or interest for the purpose of individual designation. Although 26 Albert Street is already protected through its designation under the provisions of the heritage conservation district, these criteria help demonstrate the significance of this individual dwelling.
The purpose of the regulation is
to provide an objective base for the determination and evaluation of resources
of cultural heritage value. The
prescribed criteria help ensure the effective, comprehensive and consistent
determination of value or interest by all
The subject property has cultural heritage value or interest as it meets the following criteria:
Preservation of the house would not limit the extent to which the property could be developed
The preservation of the James Campbell
House would not compromise the extent to which the owner could develop the
property at
Evolution of
Since the mid 1990s, the Town has
approved a number of applications for expansion of the existing residential
buildings and new infill buildings in the
The demolition permit application should be refused
The applicant has the right of appeal to the
If Council refuses the demolition
permit application, within 30 days of receiving notice of Council’s decision,
the applicant may make an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board. If a hearing is held and the Board does not
support Council’s decision to refuse the demolition permit, the Board has the
power, under Section 42 of the new Ontario Heritage Act, to direct that
the demolition permit be issued with or without terms and conditions.
The issue of financial relief, as requested by the previous owner (John Wannop), was referred by Council to the CAO for review. A number of meetings were held to discuss this issue. The previous owner asserted that he had suffered a financial loss from the repeal of the demolition permit and was looking to the municipality for assistance. Staff discussed with the previous owner a number of possible options to redevelop the property while retaining the heritage building.
The preservation of a building, rather than its demolition, will diminish the amount of demolition debris going into landfill sites and is a sustainable approach that will recycle an existing structure for continued use.
Not applicable
The preservation of buildings of
cultural heritage value helps achieve a quality community by supporting the
character of the
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDED BY:
_______________________________ _______________________________
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. James Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director
of
Figure 1: Location Map
Figure 2: Photographs of the Building and Air Photo
Appendix “A”: Historical Background Summary Sheet
Q:\Development\Heritage\PROPERTY\ALBERT\26\DSC
report Nov 6 07 demo.doc
FIGURE 1
FILE PATH: Q:\Development\Heritage\PROPERTY\ALBERT\26\DSC report
Nov 6 07 demo.doc
OWNER/APPLICANT
Richard Wannop (Owner)
Russ Gregory
Gregory Design Group
905-479-4767 (O)
905-479-8496 (F)
LOCATION MAP