Report to: Development Services
Committee Report
Date:
SUBJECT: Proposed All Way Stop
Control –
PREPARED BY: Parveen Kalia,
Sabbir
Saiyed, Manager, Transportation Ext. 8120
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report entitled “Proposed All Way Stop Control – (1) Rodick Road and Riviera Drive and (2) Worthing
Avenue and Cartmel Drive” dated December 4, 2007, be received;
AND THAT Schedule 12 of By-law 106-71 for all-way stop control be
amended to include the intersections of (1) Rodick Road and Riviera Drive and
(2) Worthing Avenue and Cartmel Drive;
AND THAT the Operations Department be
directed to install the appropriate signs and pavement markings at the subject locations, funded through the
2008 Engineering budget, Capital Project #8402;
And that the Operations Department be directed to maintain the signs and pavement markings at the subject locations;
AND THAT York
Regional Police be requested to enforce the all-way stop control upon
installation of these signs and passing of the By-law;
And that Staff be
authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this
resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Not applicable
1. Purpose 2. Background 3. Discussion 4. Financial
5. Others (Environmental, Accessibility, Engage 21st, Affected Units) 6.
Attachment(s)
This report seeks Council’s approval for implementing all-way stop control at the following intersections:
The
The subject intersection is located in a commercial/
industrial area and is configured as a T-intersection with a private
driveway forming the south leg.
Currently, there exists
only two stop controls, one for southbound drivers on
The subject intersection is located in a
residential area and is configured as a four-way intersection.
To implement
all-way stop control at an intersection, the necessary warrants must be met, as
outlined by the Ontario Ministry of Transportation. The warrants consider both vehicular volume
and the vehicular volume distribution at the intersection.
In response to
resident requests for all-way stop control at the subject intersections, the
INTERSECTION |
WARRANT 1 Vehicular Volume (All Approaches) |
WARRANT 2 % Vehicular Volume on |
||||
Minimum |
Actual |
Criteria Met? |
Minimum |
Actual |
Criteria Met? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 350 |
580 |
Yes |
35% |
43% |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>350 |
409 |
Yes |
35% |
41% |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-way stop control
is warranted when both Warrants 1 and 2 are satisfied. As shown above, Warrants 1 and 2 are
satisfied at both intersections. Therefore, the
It is expected that the proposed all-way
stop control will improve traffic operational efficiency and safety at the
above intersections by providing appropriate right-of-way to drivers when
negotiating through the subject intersections.
The cost of
labour and materials to implement the signs and pavement markings are included
for in the 2008 Engineering budget, Capital Project
#8402. On-going maintenance costs for this installation will be included
in future Operations Department budgets.
The Operations
Department has reviewed this report and their comments have been incorporated.
RECOMMENDED BY:
________________________
_______________________________
Alan Brown,
C.E.T. Jim Baird,
M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of
Engineering
Commissioner, Development Services
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment 3 -
All-way Stop Control By-Law