Report to: General Committee                                                        Report Date: April 30, 2007

 

 

SUBJECT:                          Proposed Draft By-law to regulate the Non-Essential Use of Pesticides

PREPARED BY:               Mavis Urquhart, Manager, Environmental Leadership

 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT this report entitled “Proposed By-law to Regulate Non-essential Use of Pesticides” be received;

 

THAT Council hold a community Public Meeting to obtain public input on the draft proposed by-law attached as Appendix “1” to this report;

 

THAT the community Public Meeting be held in second or third week of May (May 17th May 23rd or May 24th) contingent on a moderator’s availability, from 7 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers;

 

THAT Staff be authorized to immediately provide notice of the public meeting and post the meeting notice and draft proposed by-law on the website;

 

AND THAT Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

This report includes the draft proposed by-law for regulating the non-essential use of pesticides in Markham and the phasing in of that By-law. It also provides an overview of the communications and by-law enforcement program.

 

1. Purpose                     2. Background                      3. Discussion                        4. Financial        

 

5. Others (Environmental, Accessibility, Engage 21st, Affected Units)             6. Attachment(s)

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to propose a draft by-law regulating pesticide use in the Town of Markham for consideration at a public meeting.

 

BACKGROUND:

The matter of pesticide regulation has been considered by the Town of Markham for some time now, starting with establishment of Pesticide-Free pilot projects and the Markham Pesticide Reduction Committee in 2001. Various Staff reports were considered in the past, culminating in a public meeting which was held on October 26, 2006. That meeting featured a panel of four experts (two in favour of pesticide regulation and two against pesticide regulation) who debated this issue and answered questions from the public. Approximately 200 meeting notices were sent to stakeholders (such as retailers, golf course owners, residents and others) and advertisements for the meeting were featured on the Town Page of the local newspapers. Notice was also placed on the Town’s website. The meeting was audiostreamed for the public’s benefit. Seventy-five people attended the meeting and 26 comments were received.

Staff reported back on the outcome of that public meeting in early April. At that time Council instructed that Staff prepare a proposed draft by-law for consultation at a public meeting with the intent of adopting a by-law by the end of June in the following resolution:

 

“… staff to proceed with a community consultation meeting respecting pesticide regulation in the Town of Markham;

 

And that the community meeting follow Option 2, as outlined in the staff report titled “Report on Regulating the Non-Essential Use of Pesticides”, which includes drafting a by-law restricting the non-essential use of pesticides in Markham being brought to General Committee, followed by a meeting with the public, and finally a presentation to Council for a decision before the end of June;

 

And that the draft By-law be modeled on Toronto’s pesticide By-law and further that the best practices from other municipalities be considered, including a phased in implementation program and subject to any changes that staff may recommend.”

 

Staff recommends that to accommodate the timeline set by Council, the public meeting be held in the second or third week of May (May 17th, May 23rd or May 24th) in the Council Chambers from 7 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., contingent on a moderator’s availability and that Staff be authorized to immediately provide public notice. Notice would be sent to stakeholders and published in the local newspaper. The proposed draft by-law would be posted on the website. The format of the meeting will include a Staff presentation and will be followed by public input. Staff from affected Town departments would be available to assist with responses to questions. Written responses received prior to, or at the public meeting would be incorporated in Staff report back to General Committee and Council.

 

Draft By-law

The proposed draft by-law is attached as Appendix 1 to this report and is modeled on the Toronto By-law, as directed by Council. This model has now been used in 6 of the 18 by-laws that have been passed in Ontario to date and elements of that by-law have been incorporated into others. This model has recently been adopted by the Town of Newmarket. The Toronto By-law No. 2003-05-23, was upheld in the Ontario Court of Appeal in 2005. The proposed version which is attached to the report is very similar to the Town of Newmarket By-law and primarily differs from the Toronto By-law No. 2003-05-23 in the following ways:

 

  • Exempted pesticides are set out in a Schedule rather than as part of the by-law to allow easy phase-in as new products become available;
  • Clearly states the land uses identified proposed to be exempted (i.e. golf courses, lawn bowling, hydro stations, hydro corridors) and the standards that golf courses, lawn bowling and the hydro utility must meet under IPM practice;
  • Sets out that farm practice carried out as part of an agricultural operation is not subject to the by-law.

 

For information, a copy of the Toronto By-law is attached as Appendix 4 to this report and the City of Toronto Pesticide by-law Questions and Answers publication is attached as Appendix 5.

 

Requests for Exemptions

Exemptions to the pesticide by-law have been requested for a number of land uses and. submissions have been received from representatives of:

o       Golf courses

o       A Lawn bowling Green

o       Hydro One 

Correspondence from Hydro one and the golf courses are attached as Appendices 2 and 3 to this report.

 

Golf Courses

There are numerous golf courses in the Town of Markham. Correspondence has been received and representations made from a number of golf course representatives including Remington Parkview, Angus Glen, Bushwood Golf Club and the Ontario Allied Golf Associations, which is a coalition of the Royal Canadian Golf Association (RCGA), the Canadian Golf Superintendents Association (CGSA), the Ontario Golf Superintendents Association (OGSA), the Golf Association of Ontario (GAO), National Golf Course Owners Association (NGCOA) – Ontario chapters and other affiliated organizations, associations and member clubs. The Ontario Allied Golf Associations are seeking an exemption from the by-law and have provided a detailed submission in this regard which is attached to this report (Appendix 2). Remington and Angus Glen have also requested an exemption for golf courses and state that they have always practiced Integrated Pest Management. Bushwood also requests an exemption and advises that they employ a qualified golf course superintendent who is educated in integrated pest management. The proposed draft By-law exempts golf courses provided integrated pest management techniques (IPM) are used under the direction of a qualified IPM accredited agent. (Correspondence from Remington, Angus Glen and Bushwood is also attached in Appendix 2)

 

Lawn Bowling Greens

Similar to golf courses, a lawn bowling requires a higher standard of maintenance. The Markham Lawn Bowling Club has also made representations and submitted comments requesting an exemption from any pesticide by-law stating that because they need their greens to be extremely trim, flat and smooth, they need protection from insects, weeds, etc. Lawn Bowling Greens are treated the same as golf courses in the draft proposed By-law.

 

Hydro One

A letter was received from Hydro One (Appendix 3) seeking a utility exemption. They use pesticides for two purposes: maintaining the height of vegetation in their hydro corridors and to keep hydro stations weed-free.

 

 

 

  • Height of Vegetation in Hydro Corridors

According to the correspondence received from Hydro One herbicides are essential for right-of-way vegetation control program to ensure that cut deciduous trees, such as ash, oak, poplar and maple do not resprout. An exception is provided in the proposed draft by-law in Section (2. b. (xiii)) that allows pesticide use to control growth within a hydro corridor under the direction of an I.P.M. Accredited Agent.

 

  • Infestation for stations

The Hydro One letter also states that herbicides are applied inside stations to control vegetation growth which can cause power disruptions and ground faults which can create a potentially hazardous situation for employees. They advise that herbicide application is the only practical method of controlling vegetation and ensuring stations are safe. The proposed draft by-law has accommodated this exemption request by including an exemption (2. b. (xiv)) that allows pesticide use by the Hydro utility to control growth within a hydro transmission station provided it is permitted only under the direction of an I.P.M. Accredited Agent.

 

Phase-In of the By-law

To permit a reasonable period of time for the lawn and garden care industry, as well as residents to adjust their programs and practices, and to provide time for staff to undertake an education program, the by-law is proposed not to come into effect until September 2008. This provides two growing seasons prior to beginning enforcement. While this timing will not match the City of Toronto, it will be the same as the Town of Newmarket. The Town of Georgina’s by-law is anticipated to be passed in May of this year and come into effect in 2008. A review of other by-laws regulating pesticides across the Province indicates there is often a one year phase-in period.

 

Enforcement

Successful implementation of the pesticide by-law will require a significant voluntary compliance by residents and businesses.  Education is the most efficient and effective way to achieve compliance in the community. Again, the draft by-law for Markham is proposed to come into effect September 1, 2008. During the interim period between the adoption of the by-law and it coming into effect there would be a community education period. In that period Bylaw Division staff would respond to complaints but only to educate people about the by-law. Full enforcement would begin after September 1, 2008. Based upon the level of compliance and projected workload that occurs during the interim period, additional resources may be required as part of the 2008 budget process.

 

Education Program

Similar to other by-laws that relate to environmental issues, such as an Idling Control By-law, or Tree Removal By-law, education is a key component to successfully changing public perception and behaviour. Reduction/elimination of pesticide use depends largely upon property owners’ co-operation and acceptance of new lawn care practises and standards of appearance. A comprehensive education program using a variety of existing and supplementary vehicles will be developed to reach the community.

 

Development and implementation of the 2007 portion of the public education program will be accommodated through existing 2007 budget. Additional resources will be required in 2008.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

A staff team, including representatives from the Legal, Operations, Communications and By-law and Enforcement staff has assisted in the development of this report and the attached by-law.

 

 

RECOMMENDED

BY:

 

________________________                                                ________________________

Mavis Urquhart                                                                        Jim Sales

Manager, Environmental Leadership                                          Commissioner, Community and Fire Services

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Appendix 1                Proposed Draft By-law

Appendix 2                Letters from Golf Courses requesting exemption from proposed pesticide regulations

Appendix 3                Letter from Hydro One requesting exemptions from proposed pesticide regulations

Appendix 4                City of Toronto By-law

Appendix 5                City of Toronto By-law Q&A

 

 

 

 

 

 

R:\Strategic Services\Shared Data\Environmental Leadership\Pesticides\Pesticides 2007\Reports\DraftBy-law Report Apr17071.doc