Report to: General Committee Report Date: May 3, 2007
SUBJECT: Places of Amusement – Pinball
and Video Games Rooms
By-law Amendments
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
That By-law 2002-289, “A By-law to provide for the Regulating and Licensing of Places of Amusement – Pinball and Video Games Rooms” be amended to:
·
Adjust hours of operation to
require
·
Require supervision of youths
under 16 years, during school hours and after
· Remove redundant sections, now regulated under other legislation (i.e. Fire Code);
· Create two classes of licenses, Class A for establishments with four or more machines and Class B for establishments with three or less;
· Provide requirements to prevent nuisances;
· Require a designated operator be on duty at all times at each establishment;
· Add a process for the refusal to issue and renew licences, and an appeal process; and
· All other necessary housekeeping amendments.
That By-law 2002-284, “A By-law to establish Licence Fees” be amended to establish new licence fees for Class A and Class B Places of Amusement;
That an application for an Order and a schedule of set fines pursuant to the Provincial Offences Act and the rules for the Ontario Court of Justice be made;
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Not applicable
Not applicable
To amend By-law 2002-289 to better address public nuisance and safety-related issues associated with Places of Amusement establishments.
The original Places of Amusement By-law was passed in 1982, largely as a result of public concerns relative to the proliferation of electronic amusement machines in business establishments (ex. variety stores) situated in close proximity to schools. The by-law contained a number of regulations, including restrictions designed to prohibit school age children from using the machines during school hours as well as separation distance from schools.
Today, there are new types of establishments that qualify as places of amusement under the by-law, and staff recommends they be included in the amending by-law. An example would be ‘internet cafes”, which generally fall into one of two categories:
1. Cafés specializing in the playing of computer games on a time basis; and
2. Cafés designed to allow individuals to access the internet and enjoy coffee, sandwiches, etc. at the same time.
Over the past two years, concerns with the By-law 2002-289 regulations and with activities occurring within or outside of Places of Amusement (including internet cafés) have been expressed by both the public and establishment owners. Business owners/equipment vendors have objected to the 11:00 PM restrictions on hours of operation and to the requirement that an establishment with one machine pay the same fee as an establishment with thirty machines (which is cost prohibitive for small establishments).
Creating two new classes of Places of Amusement will address the financial concerns of small businesses. The difference in the amount of the licence fee between Class A and Class B is justified because Class B establishments, having less than four machines, will require less enforcement than Class A establishments, where the primary purpose of the business is a place of amusement and are more susceptible to public nuisance and safety concerns.
The public has expressed public safety/nuisance-related concerns,
many of which have stemmed from actual incidents. For instance, there was a stabbing that took
place outside an internet café licensed by the Town as a Place of Amusement. At
the establishment involved, several contraventions of the By-law were noted,
the main one being that the business was open till
The extended hours of operation and the closing time of
The requirement to designate an operator who must be on the premises
at all times is intended to ensure that all the requirements of the by-law are
met.
Public Consultation
A public meeting on proposed changes to By-law 2002-289 was held on
During the by-law review, discussions and meetings were held with business owners and industry representatives. A workshop was held in December with York Regional Police, Building, Fire and Legal staff to complete a review of the current regulations and identify amendments.
Based on the
input received from the above consultation process, staff has developed the
following table for Committee’s consideration:
OPTIONS/
DISCUSSION:
ISSUES |
RECOMMENDATIONS |
Hours of Operation: |
|
Restrictive
hours of operation for locations with store front access; Operators of “Internet Cafes” have requested extended hours to attract non-school age clients. |
Extend hours of
operation, daily from Lack of
solutions from operators for public safety and nuisance issues in and around
businesses do not warrant longer hours past |
Locations in
enclosed malls governed by mall hours, some operate until |
Allow licensed establishments to operate machines during licenced hours of operation under Liquor Licence Act. |
Age Restrictions: |
|
Businesses in
store fronts cannot operate during school hours and youths under 16 years cannot
enter premises within enclosed malls before Unsupervised youths being in Places of Amusement late at night. Under the Child and Family Services Act, youths under 16 years of age are required to be supervised |
Age
restrictions applied consistently to all Places of Amusement regardless of
location, except those pursuant to the Liquor
License Act. Offence of
operator to permit persons under 16 years without supervision during school
hours, and after |
Class of Licences: |
|
Currently fees are $200 for all Places of Amusement regardless of the number of machines and type of business Alcohol should not be permitted to be sold in a premise where the principal business is a Place of Amusement. |
Create a Class B licence for businesses with three (3) or less machines with a fee of $100 and charge a $500 fee for Class A licence for four or more machines due to lower administration and enforcement costs of Class B establishments. Prohibit the sale of alcohol in a Class A establishments as minors are allowed in. An establishment holding a Liquor Licence by AGCO only be licensed as a Class B. |
Redundant Regulations: |
|
Other Acts now mandate standards originally only required via By-law 2002-288. |
Delete redundant references Planning, Building, and Fire regulations; however, maintain compliance with those regulations as a condition of licensing. |
Licensing Review and Administration |
|
No procedure or standards to refer an application to the Licensing Committee or for the applicant’s right of appeal. Operator not held responsible to ensure compliance with age restrictions |
Add standard licensing clauses providing review and appeal processes in by-law. Add requirement
for a designated operator to be on duty at all times and responsible for
by-law compliance. |
Addressed through Building Code and Site Plan Control regulations
Not Applicable
Legal Services
Building Services
Fire and Emergency Services
RECOMMENDED
BY:
________________________ ________________________
Sheila Birrell, Clerk Andy Taylor, Commissioner
Corporate Services