-

 

Report to: Development Services Committee                          Report Date:  December 2, 2008

 

 

SUBJECT:                          PRELIMINARY REPORT

                                            Cedarvale Markham Inc.

                                            Application for Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a mixed use development consisting of three apartment buildings and at-grade retail/commercial space.

                                            South east corner of Markham Road (Highway 48) and Anderson Avenue.

                                            File Number ZA 05-006325

PREPARED BY:               Doris Cheng, Senior Planner – East District, ext. 2331

 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

That the report dated December 2, 2008 entitled “Preliminary Report, Cedarvale Markham Inc., Application for Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a mixed use development consisting of three apartment buildings and at-grade retail/commercial space at the south east corner of Markham Road (Highway 48) and Anderson Avenue, File Number ZA  05-006325” be received;

 

That Staff be authorized to schedule a statutory Public Meeting to consider the proposed zoning by-law amendment application.

 

And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution. 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Not applicable

 

PURPOSE:


The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding an application for Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a mixed use development consisting of three apartment buildings and at-grade retail/commercial space. 

 

The report also seeks authorization to hold a statutory public meeting with respect to the proposed Zoning By-law amendment application.

 

BACKGROUND:


The revised zoning by-law amendment application by Cedarvale Markham Inc. was received on September 15, 2008 for the lands located at the southwest corner of Markham Road and Castlemore Avenue. 

 

The original application was received in 2005 when the owner at the time requested that the lands north and south of Anderson Avenue be rezoned from Select Industrial and Warehousing (M.I.) under By-law 88-76 to Major Commercial Area (MJC) under By-law 177-96.  The zoning amendment went forward in June 20, 2006 to Development Services Committee for the parcel north of Anderson Avenue to build a single tenant retail building for The Brick.  Since then, the applicant formally requested a revision to the Zoning By-law application for the parcel of land south of Anderson Avenue, in light of the Town initiated Official Plan Amendment for the Markham Road Corridor.  


 

OPTIONS/ DISCUSSION:


Property and Area Context

The subject property is approximately 2.06 hectares (5.10 acres) in area, located at the south east corner of Markham Road and Anderson Avenue (which has just been extended to the Greensborough community as the Castlemore Avenue extension, but not yet open).  Located north of Bur Oak Avenue and south of Major Mackenzie Drive, the subject lands are vacant, with storage piles of topsoil and fill from other construction sites.  There is little vegetation, except for a few trees scattered throughout the site.  The area context is as follows:

§         To the north of the subject lands is The Brick furniture store.  Further north are properties containing a single storey, multi-tenant industrial/commercial building, a recently built commercial plaza and the main Emerson Electric building

§         To the south are various one-storey multi-tenant buildings with access from Anderson Avenue, and further south, on the south side of Bur Oak Avenue is the Mount Joy GO Train station.    

§         To the west, across Markham Road are vacant lands and the recently built Home Depot and further west is the Wismer residential community

§         To the east are one-storey commercial/industrial buildings and further east, across the railway tracks is the Greensborough residential community

 

The Proposal is to add a mixed use development to the list of permitted uses

The proposed zoning by-law amendment is to permit a mixed use development consisting of three apartment buildings, which would transition in height from 12 storeys along the Markham Road frontage to 10 storeys towards Anderson Avenue.  The proposal contains a total of 624 residential units and 51,564 m˛ of retail/commercial space at grade. 

 

The applicant is proposing three access points, consisting of a right-in/right-out access on Markham Road, and two full-moves accesses onto Castlemore Avenue and Anderson Avenue.  The proposal includes a total of 924 underground parking spaces to serve the residents.  A total of 99 surface parking spaces are proposed to serve visitors and the commercial/retail uses. 

 

Also proposed is a 0.2 ha (0.5 ac) park block located at the northeast corner of the property which is proposed to be conveyed to the Town to satisfy a portion of the applicants’ parkland dedication requirements.  A site plan application in support of this proposal has not yet been submitted.

 

Highway 48: 16th Avenue to Major Mackenzie Drive Urban Design Study

The Highway 48 Urban Design Study for the Markham Road corridor between 16th Avenue and Major Mackenzie Drive was endorsed by Council in October 2005, and provides urban design and development guidelines to be used in the evaluation of development applications in the area. The vision for this corridor is to encourage a mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented district that incorporates new forms and trends in development that better support mixed retail and residential uses as well as provide a community focus. These guidelines are intended to be implemented progressively over many years as development and re-development proceeds.  Hence, the purpose of the guidelines is to steer development towards the vision of a high quality, mixed use and pedestrian friendly district and to prevent undesirable built form and developments that may preclude the long-term fulfillment of the Town’s vision for this corridor.

 

A portion of the subject land falls within the identified Avenue District (the street frontage of the Castlemore Avenue extension).  This area is identified as a key east-west linkage which joins the residential communities to the east and west of Highway 48.  Some key design principles for the Avenue District include:

§         Pedestrian and cyclist friendly, urban mixed-use streetscapes.

§         High quality design for all buildings and facades to create a strong street relationship with a minimum height of 2-4 storeys.

 

The remainder of the subject land falls within the Intensification and Future High Density Residential District.  The study recognizes this area is currently industrial in character and provides for long term redevelopment and intensification as a high density, residential node in close proximity to the GO station, and with active street-oriented uses.  Some of the key design principles for this district call for:

§         High density development within close proximity to the GO station with at least 2 leaseable floors within a mixed use buildings. 

§         Buildings are encouraged up to 8 – 12 storeys in height at key gateway locations.

§         Step backs of upper floors above the 4th storey to create an adequate transition to the street edge. 

§         Minimum FSI of 1.0 should be achieved.

 

Town has Initiated Official Plan/Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to implement the Highway 48 Urban Design Study

On October 17, 2006, Development Services Committee authorized staff to prepare Official Plan, Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law amendments to implement the approved land use and urban design vision for the Highway 48 corridor between 16th Avenue and Major Mackenzie Drive, as established in the Highway 48 Urban Design Study.  On February 19, 2008, a meeting was held with landowners in the Highway 48 corridor to discuss the implications of the proposed amendments on their properties and to receive their input.  A statutory public meeting was held on April 22, 2008. 

 

It was staff’s intention to bring forward a final recommendation report together with draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments in the fall of 2008.  However, as recently noted at a Part A session of Development Services Committee, a significant number of residential proposals have come forward in this corridor which involve requested density increases and changes to the built form.  To properly address these changes, comprehensive transportation and servicing studies are required for the entire corridor as well as the review of community services such as schools and parks.  These matters as well as developers group arrangements need to be addressed in the Official Plan and Secondary plan amendments for the area.  Staff will continue with the finalization of the process and necessary revisions to the draft Official Plan, Zoning By-law amendments and site plan control application.

 

Moreover, as noted below, the subject proposal involves an increase in density over and above what is identified in the Official Plan.  It is staff’s recommendation that comprehensive traffic and servicing studies should be completed in considering whether the proposed densities can be supported.  Staff has requested that the developers initiate comprehensive traffic and servicing studies for the area, however the time frame for completing these studies remains to be determined.

 

Site Plan Application has not been submitted

The applicant has not submitted a formal site plan application to be considered in conjunction with the zoning amendment application, but have provided a conceptual site plan for consideration (Figure 4).  The conceptual plan identifies a proposed park block at the north east corner of the site, and the proposed 12 and 10 storey buildings would be situated close to Highway 48/Markham Road and Anderson Avenue to provide a defined street wall. The parking to serve the residents is proposed underground, but some surface parking spaces are proposed to serve visitors and the retail/commercial stores at grade.   No conceptual elevations are available at this time.  Staff will request the conceptual elevations to be made available for the future statutory public meeting.

 

The Official Plan

The subject lands are designated “Major Commercial Area” in the Town of Markham Official Plan, as amended.  This designation provides opportunities for multi-use, multi-purpose centres offering a range of retail, service, community, institutional and recreation uses serving a major portion of the municipality and / or a broader regional market.  It is intended to serve as an identifiable destination for major shopping needs, recreation, entertainment and hospitality uses.  It is intended to accommodate office development and medium and high density housing at appropriate locations.

 

The applicant is proposing a total of 624 units on this 2.06 hectare (5.1 acre) site.  This results in a proposed density of 303 uph (122.4 upa) and the development would have a Floor Space Index (F.S.I) of 2.86.  The Town of Markham Official Plan currently permits a maximum net density 148 uph (60 upa) as identified in the High Density II provisions. 

 

The Town initiated Draft OPA for the Markham Road Corridor also provides that the subject lands shall be developed with higher density housing in accordance with the current Official Plan (Revised 1987) policies for high density residential development.  Further, the Draft OPA provides for a minimum building height of 4 storeys and a maximum of 8 storeys.  A minimum FSI of 1.0 is also provided for at the intersection of Castlemore Avenue and Markham Road, with maximum height of 12 storeys.  While no maximum FSI is proposed in the Draft OPA for the Markham Road Corridor at this time, the applicant is proposing an FSI of 2.86.  An appropriate density for the development will require further review. 

 

In addition, all buildings with frontage along Markham Road are required to provide ground floor related retail and commercial uses.  It should be noted that the Draft OP policies for the Markham Road Corridor are still evolving.

 

Applicable Zoning Bylaw

The site is zoned Select Industrial and Warehousing (MI) under By-law 88-76, as amended, and Commercial, retail and residential uses are currently not permitted on the lands.  A zoning by-law amendment is required to accommodate the proposal. 

 

The proposed zoning by-law amendment does not comply with the current Official Plan (Revised 1987) policies.  However, this proposal will bring the zoning by-law into conformity with the Draft Official Plan policies for the Markham Road Corridor once the Draft OP has been finalized.

 

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSAL:

§         Is generally in keeping with and furthers the vision of Urban Design Study for the area.

§         Provides high density residential development within close proximity to the Mount Joy GO Transit station.

§         Provides alternative housing options for the surrounding communities.

§         The applicant intends to comply with the Sustainable Development Through LEED Program.

 

CONCERNS / ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED


The following is a brief summary of concerns/issues raised to-date.  These matters, and any others identified through the circulation and detailed review of the proposal, will be addressed in a final staff report, if required, at a later date.

§         Assess the appropriate size and location of the proposed park block.

§         The proposed development has an F.S.I. of 2.86 and a density of 303 units per hectare (122.4 units per acre) which exceeds the High Density II provisions in the Official Plan. An appropriate density for the development remains to be determined.

§         Comprehensive traffic and servicing studies for the Markham Road corridor from 16th Avenue to Major Mackenzie Drive are to be undertaken;

§         Ensure conformity with the Highway 48 Urban Design Guidelines and the vision for the area.

§         The scale and massing of the buildings, streetscape design and open space require further review by the Urban Design division. 

§         Need to examine the integration of transit supportive opportunities with the residential and mixed commercial-retail development

§         A site plan application is required.

 

ALIGMENT WITH STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

The application needs to be considered in the context of the Town’s strategic priorities of Growth Management and Transportation and Transit.

 

 

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The application has been circulated to various Town departments and external agencies and is currently under review.  Requirements of the Town and external agencies will be reflected in the preparation of the final report, if required.

 

CONCLUSIONS:

Staff recommend that a statutory public meeting be held to consider the proposed Zoning By-law amendment once comprehensive traffic and servicing studies for the Markham Road corridor from 16th Avenue to Major Mackenzie Drive have been submitted to staff’s satisfaction.

 

RECOMMENDED BY:  

 

 

________________________________                    _____________________________

Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P, R.P.P                            Jim Baird, M.C.I.P, R.P.P

Director, Planning & Urban Design                               Commissioner, Development Services

 

ATTACHMENTS:


Figure 1 – Location Map

Figure 2 – Area Context and Zoning

Figure 3 – Air Photo 2007

Figure 4 – Site Plan

 


APPLICANT/AGENT:                      Rob Freeman

                                                            Freeman Planning Solutions Inc.

                                                            6424 Edenwood Drive

                                                            Mississauga, Ontario  L5N 3H3

                                                            Telephone: 905-824-4375

                                                            Fax: 905-824-9833

                                                            Mobile:  905-301-7290

                                                            planningsolutions@sympatico.ca

                                                           

FILE PATH:

Amanda\File 05 006325\Documents\Preliminary Report

 


Figure 1 – Location Map: