Report to: Development Services Committee                           Report Date: December 9, 2008

 

 

 

SUBJECT:                          Update on OPA’s Local Generation RFP (Northern York Region)

PREPARED BY:                Jamie Bosomworth, Manager Strategy and Innovation, Development Services Commission

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Report titled “Update on OPA’s Local Generation RFP (Northern York Region)”, dated December 9, 2008, be received;

 

That Markham Council reiterates its support for the OPA’s “Integrated Solution” for power supply to Northern York Region comprised of: Demand Reduction; New Transformer Station capacity; and Local Generation as adopted by Council on September 27, 2005 and further endorsed by Council on April 24, 2007, November 27, 2007 and June 24, 2008;

 

That the Town of Markham remains strongly opposed to a transmission contingency solution for Northern York Region and requests the OPA to continue to expedite local generation supply options to Northern York Region;

 

That this report and resolution be forwarded to the Ontario Power Authority, the Ontario Energy Board, the Ministry of Energy & Infrastructure, the Ministry of the Environment, Hydro One, PowerStream, Region of York, and the Markham – Aurora Hydro One Task Force Members;

 

That the report and resolution also be forwarded to the Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Energy & Infrastructure, the Minister of the Environment, and Region of York based M.P.P.s,;

 

That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In 2005, the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) initiated a comprehensive review of alternative solutions to meet the power supply needs of Northern York Region.  As part of this review, the OPA in 2005 established a broadly based Working Group, including representation by citizens, municipalities, public agencies, industry, and energy interest groups.  The outcome from the OPA’s 2005 York Region Working Group process was an “Integrated Solution” for electricity supply to Northern York Region.   The “Integrated Solution” is comprised of: demand reduction; new transformer station capacity; and local generation.   Markham Council has consistently gone on record since 2005 as supporting the OPA’s integrated solution.

 

Since 2005, the OPA, Hydro One and other stakeholders have implemented demand reduction initiatives and new transformer station capacity in Northern York Region.  The OPA in June 2008 initiated a Request for Proposals (RFP)   for approximately 350 MW of local generation (peaking plant) to serve Northern York Region.

 

The OPA is currently reviewing six proposals for local generation, submitted by four proponents.  Three proposals are located in the Township of King, two in the Town of East Gwillimbury and one in the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury.   The criteria being applied by the OPA in evaluating the bids were outlined in detail in a June 24, 2008 Memorandum to Markham Council.  The RFP schedule calls for the OPA to announce the selected proponent and site in December 2008.

 

Each local municipality noted above as containing a candidate site has passed a resolution indicating they will not be a willing host of a generation facility. 

 

Energy & Infrastructure Minister George Smitherman has indicated to the Northern York Region and Bradford West Gwillimbury Mayors that the OPA will continue with their process and announce the selected proponent and site for a local generation facility in December.  The Minister has also committed to attending an OPA organized public Town Hall meeting in the municipality selected in early 2009.

1. Purpose       2. Background         3. Discussion        4. Financial      5. Others (Strategic, Affected Units)       6. Attachment(s)

 

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide an update to Markham Council on the Ontario Power Authority’s Request for Proposals (RFP) for a 350 megawatt natural gas-fired simple cycle peaking generating facility in Northern York Region.  

 

BACKGROUND:

Update on implementing “Integrated Solution”

The outcome of the OPA’s 2005 York Region Working Group process was an “Integrated Solution” for electricity supply to Northern York Region(NYR).   The “Integrated Solution” is comprised of: demand reduction; new transformer station capacity; and local generation.   The installation of upgraded transmission lines through Markham and Aurora to the Armitage Transformer Station in Newmarket was identified by the OPA as a possible contingency solution (not preferred or recommended), in the event that the preferred solution of local generation could not be achieved.

 

Since 2005, the OPA has been moving forward in implementing the short term (2006 – 2008) recommendations of the integrated solution including:

-         aggressive conservation and demand management in partnership with industry, local power distribution companies, municipalities, and consumers

-         upgrades to the Armitage Transformer Station in Newmarket

-         new transformer station (under construction) at Holland Junction in King.

 

The OPA’s longer term (2008 – 2015) recommendations are in process, through the current RFP for a local generation plant in Northern York Region.  Local generation (via a 350 megawatt natural gas-fired simple cycle peaking generating facility) has been identified by the OPA as the technically preferred solution to meet the need for supply diversity and reliability in NYR.  

 

June 24, 2008 Update to Markham Council

On June 24, 2008, Council adopted a memorandum and recommendation from the Commissioner of Development Services reiterating Markham’s support of the Ontario Power Authority’s (OPA) “Integrated Solution” for power supply to Northern York Region and opposition to a transmission contingency solution for Northern York Region.  

 

The criteria being applied by the OPA in evaluating the bids were outlined in detail this Memorandum to Markham Council. 

 

Markham Council requested in June that the OPA revise its draft Request for Proposals (RFP) to place a greater emphasis on environmental, municipal consultation and community outreach criteria in the scoring and evaluating proposals for determination of a final proponent.    

 

OPTIONS/ DISCUSSION:

OPA Process for Finalizing a Site

The OPA established a process that started with the Request for Qualifications for acceptance of potential private companies, to the Request for Proposals for specific sites to the final selection of a site.   The following chart outlines the key dates in the RFP process:

 

Release of draft RFP,

June 6, 2008

Release of Final RFP

July 31, 2008

Registration deadline for Qualified Applicants to become Registered Participants

August 21, 2008

Proposal Submission Deadline

October 30, 2008

Evaluation of Proposals

November 2008

Completion of Evaluation and announcement (target date)

December 2008

 

The draft RFP document outlines a four stage Evaluation process as follows:

 

Stage 1 – Proposal Completeness Requirements (pass or fail)

Stage 2 – Mandatory Requirements (pass or fail)

Stage 3 – Rated Criteria (scoring up to a maximum 100 points)

Stage 4 – Economic Bid Evaluation and Selection (cost/value rating)

 


Of greatest interest to municipalities will be “Stage 3 – Rated Criteria” as identified below:

Overview of Rated Criteria

Maximum Point Scores

Electrical Connection Point

20

Environmental Assessment

18

Municipal and Regional Approvals

18

Community Outreach

17

External Contractor Arrangements

8

Equipment Availability

5

Fuel supply

5

Water Use

4

Water Supply

3

Proposed Milestone Date for Commercial Operation

2

Total Maximum Point Score

Minimum Required Total Point Score

100

40

 

Although the OPA received the comments from Markham Council in June 2008 requesting a greater emphasis on environmental, municipal consultation and community outreach criteria in the scoring and evaluating of proposals, the OPA did not modify the above scoring criteria.

 

Original Request for Proposals Submitted to OPA

Since the June 24 report, five companies originally qualified as potential applicants for the installation of this facility.   Out of the five, eight potential sites had been identified over the course of the period between June 2008 and October 2008 (certain proponents having more than one candidate site).   These potential eight sites under discussion were located in the following municipalities:

  • One in Town of Georgina
  • Two in Town of East Gwillimbury
  • Three in Township of King
  • Two in Town of Aurora

 

(See page 5 of this report for reduced list of final proposals currently active)

 

Municipal Reaction to Potential Sites

Public and Municipal Council reaction to the peaking plant proposals has been controversial.  Each of the proposed host municipalities passed resolutions indicating their unwillingness in being a host municipality for a gas fired simple cycle peaking generating facility.  

 

Region of York Reports

Region of York staff prepared two information reports to Planning and Economic Development Committee, September 18 and November 20, 2008.  The following issues were reported on through these two reports:

·        OPA’s  process for RFP

·        Information on proposals received

·        Local Municipality reaction to being a host municipality

·        Addressing comments received from the public

·        Regional and Provincial planning policies to be addressed

·        Environmental and health risk factors associated with such facility

·        An overview of the Environmental Assessment process.

 

As part of the approval process, proponents have applied to the Region of York for an amendment to the Regional Official Plan for candidate site locations.   The Regional staff report on November 20 recommended staff not evaluate these applications until a specific site had been selected through the OPA process.   In addition some proponents have submitted their Environmental Study Report (ESR) for their specific sites as part of the Environmental Assessment process.   Normally there is a 30 day review period to comment on these reports.   However, it is anticipated that the selected proponent and site by the OPA will not be made until after the end of the 30 day review period.   The latest Regional report has requested the OPA extend the commenting period for the Environmental Assessments until after it has made its selection decision.     

 

Markham ZAP Newsletter

Due to community concerns coming from various sources regarding the status of the OPA process, the Chair of the Hydro One Task force issued a ZAP newsletter on November 3, 2008.   This issue provided an update on the solution for electricity supply to Northern York Region, identified the OPA milestones, commented on the “Big Picture” in electricity supply, let readers know that the citizens group “STOP” have remained vigilant in pursuing the recommendations of the OPA’s 2005 Integrated Solution, and let readers know how they can be informed and what they can do to be heard.   

 

Final Proposals being Evaluated by OPA

At this the final stage of the OPA RFP process, the OPA has received six proposals from four different proponents to design, build and operate a new 350 megawatt natural gas-fired simple cycle peaking generating facility for Northern York Region.   The following is a summary of these proposals:

 

Qualified Applicant

Proponent

Facility Name

Location

Northland Power Inc.

Northland Power Inc.

Northern York Region
Project – King 1-00

18156 Dufferin St.
Township of King

Northland Power Inc.

Northland Power Inc.

Northern York Region
Project – King 2-00

1170 Miller Road
Township of King

Northland Power Inc.

Northland Power Inc.

Northern York Region
Project – EG-00

1611 Holborn Road
East
Gwillimbury

Sithe Global Canadian
Power Services Ltd.

SG Northern York Power ULC

Sluse Road Peaking
Station

48 Sluse Road
East
Gwillimbury

TransCanada Energy Ltd.

TransCanada Energy Ltd.

Bradford West Gwillimbury
Generating Station

2214 Ninth Line
West Gwillimbury

Pristine Power Inc.

York Energy Centre LP

York Energy Centre

18781 Dufferin St.
Township of King

 

In summary there are now three proposals in the Township of King, two proposals in East Gwillimbury and one proposal in Bradford West Gwillimbury.   Each of the affected municipalities has passed a resolution indicating their reluctance in being a host municipality for this type of facility.

The OPA have indicated each proposal “will be evaluated by an independent panel and the process will be monitored by an external fairness advisor, with the final selection to be publicly announced by year-end. Following selection, the winning project must continue with the municipal and regional land-use approval processes, as well as complete the Provincial environmental assessment process.”

News Release from Northern York Region and Bradford West Gwillimbury Mayors

The Northern York Region and Bradford West Gwillimbury Mayors met with Energy Minister Smitherman on Friday November 21 to discuss the Mayors’ concerns related to the installation of a peaking facility in Northern York Region or Southern Simcoe County.  On Monday November 24, the Northern York Region and Bradford West Gwillimbury Mayors issued a joint media release (attached as Appendix ‘A’).

 

The November 24 media release states that  Minister Smitherman responded to the Mayors’ concerns by acknowledging the collective position that they are “unwilling hosts,” but assuring them that the need for power is real and that the procurement process is continuing with an expected mid to late December announcement of the selected proponent and site. The Minister outlined to the Mayors why the facility is the best solution for Northern York Region’s/Bradford West Gwillimbury’s growing energy needs, as well as explaining how this solution is part of the Province’s overall commitment to reduce dependability on coal-fired generation. Smitherman also stated that the Province will continue to promote conservation and the use of renewable energy where possible.

 

Minister Smitherman committed to attending an OPA organized public Town Hall meeting in the municipality of the selected site in early 2009”.

 

Next Steps

After the OPA has made a decision on the selected proponent and site by the end of December, the successful proponent will continue pursing necessary approvals prior to construction.   It is anticipated that this will involve any applicable municipal approvals under the Planning Act, as well as EA approvals under the Environmental Assessment Act.  Interested parties will have an opportunity to comment on the submitted Environmental Study Report submitted by the winning proponent.   The terms of the RFP provide that the facility be in place and operating by 2011.  

 


FINANCIAL TEMPLATE

There are no direct financial implications to the Town of Markham stemming from this report

 

DEPARTMENTS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

Not applicable at this time.

 

 

RECOMMENDED

                            BY:    ________________________         

                                      Jim Baird, MCIP,RPP

                                      Commissioner, Development Services            

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:

 

Appendix ‘A’   -   Joint Media Release, Monday, November 24, 2008