Report to: General Committee                                                    Report Date: January 22, 2008

 

 

SUBJECT:                          Markham Accessibility Guidelines - Stakeholder Feedback

PREPARED BY:               Eardley Adams, Project Manager.  Extension 2710

 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT the report titled “Markham Accessibility Guidelines - Stakeholder Feedback” dated January 22, 2008, be received;

 

AND THAT Council thank the local stakeholders for their effort to review the guidelines and for providing their comments;

 

AND THAT Council endorse the Markham Accessibility Guidelines for overcoming barriers within the interior and exterior of Town owned facilities;

 

AND THAT Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Not applicable

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to update Council on feedback received from local stakeholders on their review of the Markham Accessibility Guidelines (the guidelines).  The purpose is also to have Council endorse the Markham Accessibility Guidelines for Town owned facilities.

 

BACKGROUND:

At its meeting of June 26, 2007, Council endorsed the Markham Accessibility Guidelines, in principle.  Council also requested staff to receive feedback from local community stakeholders on the guidelines and report back in September 2007.

 

In July 2007, copies of the Markham Accessibility Guidelines were distributed to Union Villa, Participation House, and the Markham Seniors Centre for their review.  All three organizations enthusiastically received the document and expressed eagerness to participate.  However, due to the summer holiday season, they were unable to complete their review and submit their comments until mid-October.  The comments have been reviewed by staff, the consultant and the Accessibility Committee.  The comments and responses are summarized below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPTIONS/ DISCUSSION:

 

The comments provided by stakeholders together with staff responses are summarized below.

Comment 1

“The binder needs to be available in large print, Braille and in audio formats.”

Response

 

Large print format is available.  However, Braille and audio format would require that the guidelines be translated into these formats.

 

The Canadian National Institute for the Blind – CNIB has provided the following cost estimates to complete the translation.

 

·              Converting the guidelines to Braille, approximately 500 pages $4,500 and $275.00 per copy

·              Conversion of the guidelines to audio $2,390

 

Staff discussed this matter with the Accessibility Committee.  It was agreed that as the guidelines provide professional designers with technical standards for designing buildings, the demand for the Braille and audio formats would be very limited.  On this basis and given the high cost of the translation, it is recommended that translation of the guidelines into Braille and audio cannot be justified at this time.

 

Comment 2

 “In Section B - Interior Environments pages B32 and B33, re: change tables - these would need to adjustable and capable of being lowered and raised for persons to be transferred to and from a wheelchair.”

Response

Currently, the Town provides change tables for infants in washrooms as a convenience for parents.  The change tables discussed in the guidelines are contemplated for use by severely-disabled children and adults.  This is a relatively new development that requires careful study and development.   As indicated in the above comment, for these tables to be functional they would require mechanisms to allow for transferring of the disabled person to and from their chair to the table.  They would also require a significant amount of space.  As a result, the installation of these tables will be expensive.  Furthermore, there is no regulatory requirement for these tables and the demand for them is unknown. On this basis, they would only be installed in locations with a demonstrated need for an adult changing table.

Although the guidelines establish the basic parameters for the changing tables, they do not specify the details for their design.  Each installation will be designed to incorporate site specific requirements and the most up to date design features.  Each design will be reviewed by the Accessibility Committee.  Once we have sufficient experience with the installation of these tables, a standard design will be finalized and incorporated into the guidelines.  It is not recommended to change the guidelines at this time.      

Comment 3

In Exterior Environments, it is mentioned that "an accessible pedestrian route is required leading from designated accessible parking spaces to the nearest accessible entrance", but what is not mentioned is that there should also be an unobstructed accessible pedestrian route along sidewalks to the nearest accessible entrance for those arriving on foot, thereby not approaching from the parking spaces.”

Response

The quote regarding providing an accessible pedestrian route form an accessible parking spot to the building entrance is included in the Section ‘A’ Exterior Environments, sub- section Parking.  Section ‘A’, Exterior Environments also has a sub-section entitled Accessible Routes and Approaches.   This sub-section states that “Continuous and level pedestrian routes that lead from the site boundary of a facility to its nearest entrance or other amenities must also be a priority”.  This statement will be amended to the following:

“Continuous and level pedestrian routes are required leading from the site boundary of a facility to its nearest entrance or other amenities”. 

Comment 4

 

“On page A5, the minimum vertical clearance for parking is stated as "2.75 m or 9 ft".  We have a problem because height clearance needed for our vans is at least 10 ft.”

 

Response       

 

The guidelines provide for a minimum vertical clearance of 2.75 m (9 feet).  It also allows for a vertical clearance of 3.55 m or (11’-8”) in locations that require access by special transit vehicles such as Mobility Transit Vehicles.

 

The guidelines will be amended to require that the minimum vertical clearance over passenger loading zones will be 3.55 m or (11’ – 8”).   

 

 

 

 

 

Comment 5

 

“Page A6, I couldn't find the definition of bollard at the back.”

 

Response

 

The following definition of a bollard will be added to the guidelines. “A bollard is one of a series of short posts used for preventing vehicles from entering an area”. 

 

Conclusion

 

The Markham Accessibility Guidelines establish the Town as a leader in providing accessible features within Town facilities.  Staff will continue working with the Accessibility Committee to regularly review and update the guidelines to ensure that they reflect the best practices, code requirements, and public expectations for the provision of accessible environments within Town facilities.

 

The comments provided by the various stakeholders have been very helpful in finalizing the updated Markham Accessibility Guidelines.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND TEMPLATE: (external link)

Not applicable

 

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:

Not applicable

 

ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:

The report has been reviewed by the Accessibility Committee. They concur with the recommendations.

 

ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:

Not applicable  

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

Not applicable  

 

RECOMMENDED

 

BY: ________________________                              ________________________

      Steve Andrews P. Eng.                                           Peter Loukes P. Eng.   

      Director of Asset Management                                Commission Lead

                                                                                    Operations and Asset Management

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Q:\Commission Share\Operations and Asset Management\Reports\2008\Asset Management\FACILITIES\Markham Accessibility Guidelines -  Stakeholder Feedback - Jan 22, 2008.doc