STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

John Livey, Chief Administrative Officer

Re: 

013-T-08 Supply and Delivery of Steel Catch basin and Maintenance Hole Frames and Grates

Date: 

March 13, 2008

Prepared by:

Jeff Johnston, Supervisor, Contract Administration, Operations

Amit Sobti, Senior Buyer, Purchasing

RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

Wamco Supply Inc. (Lowest Priced Supplier)

Original Budget and Account #

$ 241,600.00

050 6150 8602 005 – Asphalt Resurfacing-Other

Current Budget Available 

$   86,600.00

Budget allocated for this line item

Less cost of award

$   76,777.20

$   76,777.20

$   76,777.20

$ 230,331.60

June - December,2008, Inclusive of PST, Exclusive of GST

June - December,2009, Inclusive of PST, Exclusive of GST*

June - December,2010, Inclusive of PST, Exclusive of GST*

Total Cost of Award

Budget Remaining after this award

$     9,822.80

**

* Subject to council approval of the 2009 & 2010 budget.

**Remaining balance will be transferred to a contingency account for Asphalt Resurfacing and the 2008 Asphalt Program will be monitored to year-end to determine if required.

 

PURPOSE

To obtain approval to award the contract for Supply and Delivery of Steel Catch basin and Maintenance Hole Frames and Grates for a period of (3) three years (2008 – 2010).

 

BACKGROUND

The steel catchbasin and manhole frames and grates supplied under this contract will be used in roadways under the rehabilitation program. During the course of construction, deficient frames and grates are identified and replaced with new steel. The quantities of steel required have been estimated based on the number of units replaced during previous construction seasons.

 

BID INFORMATION

Advertised

Electronic Tendering Network

Bids closed on

January 23, 2008

Number picking up bid documents

4

Number of companies responding to bid

4

                                                                       

PRICE SUMMARY

Supplier

Price, Inclusive of PST and Exclusive of GST

Wamco Supply Inc.

$76,777.20 *

McCoy Construction Castings

$78,239.41

Yorkwest Plumbing Supplies

$81,466.56

Cedar Infrastructure Products

$83,795.04

* As compared to the previous contract, this contract represents an approximate 15% decrease in unit cost. Prices are firm, fixed and not subject to any escalation clauses for the three (3) year period (2008-2010).

                                                                                                               

 


 

                                            

                                      STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

John Livey, Chief Administrative Officer

Re: 

015-T-08 Routing, Cleaning and Sealing of Cracks in Asphalt at Various Locations

Date: 

March 25, 2008

Prepared by:

Morgan Jones, Supervisor, Contract Administration, Operations

Amit Sobti, Senior Buyer, Purchasing

 

RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

Road Savers 2000 Ltd. (Lowest Priced Supplier)

Original Budget and Account #

A $   80,000.00

050 6150 8311 005 – 2008 Route & Seal Replacement Program

Current Budget Available 

B $   80,000.00

Budget allocated for this line item

Less cost of award

$   80,000.00

$   80,000.00

$   80,000.00

 $ 240,000.00

June - December, 2008, Exclusive of GST

June - December, 2009, Exclusive of GST*

June - December, 2010, Exclusive of GST*

Total Cost of Award

Budget Remaining after this award

C                -

**

* Subject to council approval of the 2009 & 2010 budget.

** 2008 Budget after award is $0.00 (A – B = C).

 

PURPOSE

To obtain approval to award the contract for Routing, Cleaning and Sealing of Cracks in Asphalt at various locations for a period of (3) three years (2008 – 2010).

 

BACKGROUND

The original estimate was for approximately 54,000 lineal metres (l.m). Based on the bid submissions, the Town will limit the lineal metres to a maximum of 53,691 l.m (cost of $1.49/ l.m) to meet budget availability of $80,000. This will not have a measurable impact on service levels.

 

BID INFORMATION

Advertised

Electronic Tendering Network

Bids closed on

March 19, 2008

Number picking up bid documents

5

Number of companies responding to bid

3

                                                                       

PRICE SUMMARY*

Supplier

Price, Exclusive of GST

Road Savers 2000 Ltd.

$80,460.00

MultiSeal Inc.

$89,100.00

RoadMaster Road Construction & Sealing Ltd.

$93,420.00

* Prices are firm, fixed and not subject to any escalation clauses for the three (3) year period (2008-2010).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                 

 

 

 

 

 


 

                                          

                                                   STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

Peter Loukes, Commission Lead, Operations and Asset Management

Re: 

029-T-08 Irrigation system Start-Up, Winterization and Repair

Date: 

April 25, 2008

Prepared by:

Mark Ingwersen, District Manager (West), Operations

Amit Sobti, Senior Buyer, Purchasing

 

RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

Metro Lawn Sprinklers (Lowest Priced Supplier)

Original Budget

$ 274,406.00

730 732 5415 Sportsfield Maintenance – 2008

Budget Allocated to award

$   60,200.00

Budget allocated for this line item -2008 Period (Jun – Dec 2008)

Less cost of award

$   60,200.00

$   16,216.00

$   76,416.00

2008 estimate (Jun – Dec 2008)

2009 estimate (Jan – May 2009) *

Total Cost of Award

Budget Remaining after this award

$0.00

 

 *Subject to Council approval of 2009 operating budget

 

PURPOSE

To obtain approval to award the contract for the irrigation system start-up, winterization and repair.

 

BACKGROUND

The irrigation systems Townwide require initial spring startup, maintenance throughout the season including repair of broken pipes, damaged valves and sprinkler heads, and controller repairs to ensure safe and efficient operation.  Winterization is required to protect these assets from damage related to freezing of the systems.  Staff are recommending award for one year, with the option to renew for four additional years at the same 2008 rates, upon satisfactory performance of the low bid contractor in 2008.

 

BID INFORMATION

Advertised

 Electronic Tendering Network

Bids closed on

April 09, 2008

Number picking up bid documents

5

Number responding to bid

2

 

OPTIONS / DISCUSSION

The Tender was issued for a One (1) Year Contract Term with an option to renew for Four (4) additional years (June 01, 2009May 31, 2013) at the same 2008 prices. Upon the completion of the 1st year, staff will seek appropriate approval for the remaining four (4) years (dependant on performance).

 

PRICE SUMMARY (Inclusive of PST, Exclusive of GST)

Supplier

Cost per hr*

Estimated Annual (Hours)

Total Cost **

Metro Lawn Sprinklers

 $        63.68

1200

$                76,416.00

Enviro Turf

 $        72.00

1200

$                86,400.00

* Hourly rates are firm fixed for a period of five (5) years and successful bidder was also the incumbent.

** Based on the previous contract (2004-2007), this price represents a 15% increase. However, prices are fixed until 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

Allan Seabrooke, Commission Lead, Community and Fire Services

Re: 

034-Q-08 Supply and Delivery of Footwear for the Fire Department

Date: 

April 9, 2008

Prepared by:

Glenn Dick, Acting Deputy Fire Chief, Support Services

Betty Leung, Purchasing Assistant


 RECOMMENDATION:

Recommended Suppliers

Industrial Safety Equipment Company Ltd - ISECO (Lowest Priced Supplier)

Original Budget and Account #

$   121,748.00

420-599-4260 Uniforms *

Current Budget Available 

A $     95,563.31

 

Less cost of award

B $     17,688.84

$     26,533.26

$     26,533.26

 $       8,844.42

$     79,599.78

2008 (May 1 – Dec 31) Estimated Award

2009 (Jan 1 – Dec 31) Estimated Award **

2010 (Jan 1 – Dec 31) Estimated Award **

2011 (Jan 1 – Apr 30) Estimated Award **

Total Estimated Cost of Award, Excl. of GST

Estimated 2008 Budget remaining after award

C $     77,874.47

***

* $30,000.00 of the $121,748.00 approved budget is allocated towards annual  footwear.

** Subject to Council approval of the 2009, 2010 and 2011 operating budgets.

*** The estimated favourable balance of $77,874.47 (A-B=C) will be used towards uniforms and offsetting other operating costs as needed. Future years’ operating budgets may be adjusted upon review of Fire Services needs.

 

PURPOSE:

To obtain approval to award the contract for Supply and Delivery of Footwear for the Fire Department over a three (3) year period (2008 – 2011).

 

BACKGROUND:

Quotations were requested for the Supply and Delivery of ladies and men’s steel toe work boots and shoes, to meet the Town of Markham’s Fire Department’s minimum safety standards.

 

 BID INFORMATION:

Advertised

By Invitation

Bids closed on

March 19, 2008

Number invited to bid

3

Number responding to bid

2


  PRICE SUMMARY:

  Supplier

Highest Cost

Per Pair

234 Employees

Total Price

Inclusive of PST and exclusive of GST

Industrial Safety Equipment Company Ltd. (ISECO) *

$   113.39

$ 26,533.26

Mister Safety Shoes *

$   129.55

$ 30,314.70

* Shoe prices for Industrial Safety Equipment Company Ltd. range from $86.39 to $113.39 (excl. GST) per pair versus Mister Safety Shoes price ranges from $107.95 to $129.55 (excl. GST) per pair.

* Compared to the previous year’s contract, this contract mobilizes a shoe truck to supply and deliver footwear to various Fire hall locations - saving valuable time for Fire Department personnel. The previous contract had Fire Department Personal drive to certain store locations throughout the Town to receive their required footwear.

 

 

 

 

STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

Allan Seabrooke, Commissioner Lead

Re: 

066-Q-08 Markham Green Golf Course, Irrigation Well

Date: 

April 17, 2008

Prepared by:

Glen Taylor, Manager, Community Centre Operations

Tony Casale, Senior Buyer, Purchasing

 

 RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

Northern Well Drilling Limited (Lowest Priced Supplier)

Original Budget and Account #

$  66,000.00

070 5350 8305 005 Rouge Riv Golf Irrigation

Current Budget Available 

$  63,483.66

 

Less cost of award

   $  65,710.00

Inclusive of PST and exclusive of GST 

Budget Remaining after this award

($   2,226.34)

*

*   The shortfall of $2,226.34 will be funded by the Capital Contingency account # 044-7950-6395-000.

 

PURPOSE

To obtain approval to award the contract for the drilling of an exploratory well at the Markham Green Golf Course.

 

BACKGROUND

In 2002, Burnside Golf services reviewed the ‘Take Water Permit’ to MOE and recommended that a long term solution would be required to provide a well to ensure adequate irrigation of the Markham Green Golf Course.

 

BID INFORMATION

Advertised

Electronic Tendering Network

Bids closed on

April 11, 2008

Number invited to bid

6

Number responding to bid

5

 

PRICE SUMMARY

Supplier

Price, Inclusive of PST and exclusive of GST

Northern Well Drilling Limited

 $ 65,710.00

Ontario Drilling

$ 70,300.00

G. Hart & Sons Well Drilling Ltd.

$ 76,338.48

Fred Constable & Son Ltd.

$ 89,704.00

Wilson’s Water Wells Ltd.

$ 93,720.00

 


                  

                                                                 STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

John Livey, Chief Administrative Officer

Re: 

081-T-08 Supply and Delivery of Field Line Marking Paint

Date: 

May 9, 2008

Prepared by:

Doug Henderson, Supervisor, Operations

Tony Casale, Senior Buyer

 

 RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

Solignum Inc. (Lowest Priced Supplier)

Original Budget and Account #

$274,406.00

730-732-5415 Sports field Maintenance

Budget allocated for this item

$  23,781.00

Budget allocated for 1120 containers *

Less cost of award

$  22,702.40

$  50,675.00

$  50,675.00

$124,052.40

Inclusive of PST , exclusive of GST (2008-8 months)

2009 award, subject to budget approval

2010 award, subject to budget approval

Total

Budget Remaining after this award

       $    1,078.60

**

*The annual quantity required is 2500 containers.  Staff purchased 1380 containers from the previous blanket order that expired in April 2008, the outstanding requirement for 2008 is 1120 containers.

** Remaining balance will be used for various sports field expenses and material supplies for renovation of sports fields as budgeted for in account 730-732-5415

 

PURPOSE

To obtain approval to award the contract for the supply and delivery of field line marking paint.

 

BACKGROUND

The quotation was issued for the supply and delivery of field line marking paint for sportsfields.  The estimated annual quantity is based on 2,500 containers at 19 litres per container.

 

BID INFORMATION

Advertised

Electronic Tendering Network

Bids closed on

 May 9, 2008

Number picking up bid documents

6

Number responding to bid

4

 

PRICE SUMMARY (Inclusive of PST, Exclusive of GST)

Supplier

19 Litre Container

Est. Containers (Annual)

Total price

Solignum Inc.

$20.27 *

2500

$50,675.00 *

Sico  INC/AKZO Nobel

$20.47

2500

$51,175.00

ICI Canada Inc.

$21.44

2500

$53,600.00

BEHL Chemicals Inc.

$27.00

2500

$67,500.00

*   Prices are firmed fixed for the duration of this contract (2008-2010) with low bidder who was also the previous supplier.

** Based on the previous contract (2005-2007), this price represents a 5% decrease.

                             

        STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

Peter Loukes, Commissioner Lead, Operations and Asset Management

Re: 

082-T-08 Unionville Library Lighting Retrofit

Date: 

May 2, 2008

Prepared by:

Eardley Adams, Project Manager, Asset Management

Malcolm Hann, Senior Construction Buyer, Purchasing

 

RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

Electro Instal Corporation (Lowest Priced Supplier)

Original Budget and Account #

$  344,350.00

056-6150-8632-005 2008 Lib. Fac. Improvement (Unionville)

Current Budget Available 

$  213,303.15

056-6150-8632-005 Lighting Retrofit

Less cost of award

   $    68,850.00

   $    10,327.50

   $    79,177.50 

Unionville Library Lighting Retrofit Exclusive of GST

Construction Contingency (15%)

Total

Budget Remaining after this award

   $  134,125.65

*

* Upon payment all of invoices and completion of project, the remaining balance will be used for further Unionville Library upgrades.

 

PURPOSE

To obtain approval to award the contract for Unionville Library Lighting Retrofit.

 

BACKGROUND

The work involved in this project is a lighting retrofit brought about by the life cycle of the lighting system. This retrofit will improve known poor lighting levels of the facility. The system has been designed with energy conservation in mind.

 

 

BID INFORMATION

Advertised

  Electronic Tendering Network

Bids closed on

April 30, 2008

Number picking up bid documents

10

Number responding to bid

3

 

PRICE SUMMARY

Supplier

Price Exclusive of GST

Electro Instal Corporation

$68,850.00

Platinum Electrical Contractors

$96,818.00

Black & McDonald Ltd.

$166,889.00

 


                                                                STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

Jim Baird, Commissioner, Development Services

Re: 

041-Q-08 Employment Lands Strategy Update

Date: 

May 16, 2008

Prepared by:

Elisabeth Silva-Stewart, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Services

Malcolm Hann, Senior Construction Buyer

RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

UrbanMetrics Inc. (highest ranked / third lowest price).

Original Budget and Account #

$   75,000.00

080-5399-8127-005 Employment lands

Current Budget Available 

$   75,000.00

Budget allocated for this purchase

Less cost of award

$   72,500.00

Excluding GST

Budget Remaining after this award

$     2,500.00

*

* The remaining balance will be returned to the original funding source upon payment of the final invoice.

 

PURPOSE

To award the contract for the Employment Lands Strategy Update.

 

BACKGROUND

The Town of Markham solicited proposals from qualified consultants to assist in the preparation of a new Employment Lands Strategy to guide corporate decisions regarding the achievement of employment forecasts for Markham over the planning period to 2031, particularly as this is influenced by the demand for employment lands, and the supply, characteristics and performance potential of the Town’s employment lands.  The Employment Lands Strategy will examine the 25 year period to 2031 (2006-2031) and will culminate in an updated policy framework for the provision and development of employment lands.

 

BID INFORMATION

Advertised

Electronic Tendering Network

Bids closed on

March 26, 2008

Number picking up bid documents

6

Number responding to bid

4

 

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

The evaluation team was comprised of staff from the Engineering Department with purchasing staff acting as the facilitator. The evaluation was based on pre-established evaluation criteria as listed in the Request for Proposal:  30% qualification and experience of the firm, 30% quality of the proposal, 20% qualifications of the lead consultant and project team, 20% price, totaling 100%, with resulting scores as follows

 

Consultant

Score (out of 100)

Rank Results

UrbanMetrics Inc.

93.5*

1

Metropolitan International Knowledge

90.0*

2

Sorensen Gravely Lowes

81.0*

3

Hemson Consulting

80.6*

4

Note: The four (4) bid submissions prices ranged from to $ 72,439.00 to $84,744.00.  *The four (4) proponents participated in a teleconference to clarify details of their submission, after which the evaluation scoring was completed.

 

The highest ranked proponent, UrbanMetrics is partnering with Meridian and was 0.1% higher in price as compared to the lowest priced proponent. However, they are recommended for this project due to their direct and recent experience in Markham on related matters (eg. Competitiveness Strategy, Town Employment Zoning Bylaw). They demonstrated a thorough understanding of the study requirements, met the study requirements and targets and made provision for a high degree of consultation (stakeholder, staff and elected officials) and their bid is within budget.


STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 1

To:

Jim Baird, Commissioner, Development Services

Re: 

006-Q-08 Agricultural Assessment

Date: 

April 24,2008

Prepared by:

Lilli Duoba, Senior Project Co coordinator, Planning and Development Services

Malcolm Hann, Senior Construction Buyer

 

RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

Planscape (highest ranked / highest price)

Original Budget and Account #

$ 80,000.00

080-5399-7715-005 Agricultural Activity

Current Budget Available

$ 80,000.00 

Budget allocated for this purchase

Less cost of award

$ 71,375.00

Excluding GST

Budget Remaining after this award

$   8,635.00

*

* The remaining balance will be returned to the original funding source upon payment of the final invoice.

 

PURPOSE

To award the contract for the Agricultural Assessment study.

 

BACKGROUND

As part of the background studies for the Growth Management Strategy, the Town of Markham prepared Terms of Reference for an Agricultural Assessment. The Agricultural Assessment is required to address Provincial Policy requirements for agricultural in the context of the Growth Plan, prepare base line data, identify trends in agricultural, assess the feasibility of retaining a permanent agricultural presence in Markham and options for viable and sustainable agriculture in the Greenbelt.

 

BID INFORMATION

Advertised, place and date

Electronic Tendering Network

RFQ closed on

March 7, 2008

Number picking up bid documents

 8

Number responding to bid

 5

 

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

The evaluation team was comprised of staff from the Engineering Department with purchasing staff acting as the facilitator. The evaluation was based on pre-established evaluation criteria as listed in the Request for Proposal:  30% qualification and experience of the firm, 30% quality of the proposal, 20% qualifications of the lead consultant and project team, 20% price, totaling 100%, with resulting scores as follows:

 

Consultant

Score (out of 100)

Rank Results

Planscape

87.8*

1

Meridian Planning

84.4*

2

Harry Cummings & Associates

80.3*

3

Clark Consulting Services

74.2

4

AgPlan

56.6

5

Note: The five (5) bid submissions bids prices ranged from to $ 68,725.00 to $71,375.00.

*The three (3) highest ranked proponents were invited for interviews after the initial evaluation scoring had been completed. The interviews were not scored, however, they provided the top three (3) proponents a forum to present and clarify certain items within their proposal.

 

The highest ranked proponent, Planscape, was 3.8% higher in price as compared to the lowest priced proponent. However, they are recommended for this project due to their extensive experience in broad policy issues, municipal agricultural issues, focus of the firm in agriculture planning, work program, and their project team/lead identified within this proposal.


 

STAFF AWARD REPORT                                            Page 1 of 2

To:

John Livey, Chief Administrative Officer

Re: 

110-S-08 Building Markham’s Future Together Online Public Consultation

Date: 

May 12, 2008

Prepared by:

Vicky McGrath, Manager Executive Operations

 

RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Supplier

Delvinia Interactive Inc. (Preferred Supplier)

Original Budget and Account #

      $120,000.00

043-5399-8454-005 Sustainability Plan

Current Budget Available 

$113,924.00

 

Less cost of award

$  55,000.00

Inclusive of Disbursement, Exclusive of GST

Budget Remaining after this award

 $  58,924.00*

 

*The remaining balance in the amount of $58,924.00 will be applied to further sustainability plan projects as budgeted for in account 043-5399-8454-005

 

Staff further recommends:

THAT the tendering process be waived in accordance with Purchasing By-Law 2004-341, Part II, Section 7 (1) (a) which states “where it necessary or in the best interests of the Town to acquire non-standard items or Consulting and Professional Services from a preferred supplier or from a supplier who has a proven track record with the Town in terms of pricing, quality and service. “

 

PURPOSE

To obtain approval to award the contract for online consultation and public engagement for Building Markham’s Future Together.

 

BACKGROUND

In November 2007, Mayor Scarpitti and members of Council launched Click with Markham, a multi-media, online experience offering Town residents an opportunity to make their opinions count during Council’s strategic planning process. Through this process, more than 3,600 people who live or work in Markham responded during Click with Markham’s innovative on-line review and questionnaire.

 

Click with Markham was:

·         Largest interactive municipal survey done in Ontario

·         Innovative multi-media advanced interactive technology

·         In keeping with "Canada's High-Tech Capital"

 

The results of Click with Markham, in December 2007, indicated support for Council’s six strategic areas of focus - growth, transportation, environment, parks, recreation, culture, libraries and public safety, municipal services and diversity.

 

At its March 25, 2008, meeting, Council approved the six strategic areas of focus including the corresponding issue statements, action plans and phasing targets for each of the six strategic areas of focus. The issue statement, action plans and phasing targets for the environment will inform and guide the Green Print process, one of the action plans under the environment as a strategic priority.

 

DISCUSSION

For the Green Print, in addition to the “traditional” civic engagement process, a web-based sustainability forum will be created for youth and children that builds upon the Click with Markham platform.  Within this web based forum will be a wikiGreen Print, based on wikipedia, for review and editing by the community.  The consultant will be asked to identify other innovative communication and consultation tools to effectively provide information on the Green Print to the public and receive comments and feedback, consistent with the Town’s identification with being at the forefront of technology.  In order to optimize the use of the Click with Markham multi-media platform, staff recommend using Delvinia Interactive Inc., the company that created the Click with Markham platform, to build on the interactive, online experience for public consultation. Public consultation and civic engagement, both online and traditional community-based, will be ongoing through the Building Markham’s Future Together process. In order to capitalize on the development of the Click with Markham platform and continue with a consistent “look and feel” across all six strategic priorities, it is necessary to use Delvinia as the preferred supplier.

 

 

 

110-S-08                                                                                                                                                                               Page 2

Building Markham’s Future Together Online Public Consultation

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

As each strategic priority moves forward in their public engagement process, the lead may provide a preferred supplier report outlining the use of Delvinia’s Click with Markham platform. Delvinia may build further upon the experience developed through the Green Print online engagement process and incorporate the needs of each strategic priority.  This will allow Delvinia to efficiently build on each strategic priority and reduce costs overall.