Report to: Development Services Committee Date of Meeting: March
24, 2009
SUBJECT: Toward
a
Outlining an Intensification Strategy
PREPARED BY: Policy and Research Division Staff,
Planning
and Urban Design Department
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report entitled “Toward a
Markham Growth Management Strategy: Outlining an Intensification Strategy”,
dated
And that the “Intensification Principles” and the
“Intensification Hierarchy”, as described in the report, be endorsed as a basis
and framework for finalizing a Markham Intensification Strategy addressing both
residential and employment intensification within the Town’s current settlement
area;
And that Staff report back to Development Services Committee with
a recommended Intensification Strategy following endorsation of the preferred
alternative for housing and employment growth as identified in the Markham
Growth Management Strategy;
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Intensification within the Town’s current settlement area is
a key component of the Town’s emerging Growth Management Strategy which focuses
on containing growth within the current settlement area. An Intensification Strategy is necessary to
guide
The strategy must provide overall direction on where both residential and employment intensification should occur, appropriate land uses and amount of development, and the anticipated phasing of new development. It must have regard for the Provincial and Regional emphasis on intensification as the means of encouraging the development of urban centres and corridors at transit supportive densities. The strategy details will be subsequently refined in Secondary Plan, or more locally focused area studies. Intensification must be planned for and guided by Town policies and requirements, and be directed to preferred locations at transit nodes and along transit corridors.
At this time, Staff is seeking
endorsement of “Intensification Principles” and an “Intensification Hierarchy” to
be used as a basis and
framework for finalizing a Markham Intensification Strategy addressing both
residential and employment intensification within the Town’s current settlement
area.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None at this time.
1. Purpose 2.
Background 3. Discussion 4.
Financial
5. Others (Environmental,
Accessibility, Engage 21st, Affected Units) 6. Attachment(s)
The purpose of this report is to
provide Development Services Committee with an update on the Residential and
Employment Intensification Analysis currently underway as a component of the
Town’s Growth Management Strategy Study and to secure endorsement of an
approach to finalizing a Town of
Provincial
Requirement for a Town of
Under the Provincial Growth Plan, all municipalities must “develop and implement through their official plans and other supporting documents, a strategy and policies to phase in and achieve intensification within their current settlement area.” For residential intensification, the Growth Plan has established a target requiring that “by the year 2015 and for each year thereafter, a minimum of 40% of all residential development occurring annually within each upper and single tier municipality will be within the built up area.” This target must be met across York Region as a whole with intensification in the local municipalities contributing to the overall target.
The Province has defined the built up area, in terms of the
“Built Boundary” in each local municipality in York Region, including
The Growth Plan intensification policies direct municipalities to identify the appropriate type and scale of development in intensification areas. To be effective in shifting new development toward a more intense compact development form, the Provincial intensifi-cation targets must be accompanied by a comprehensive package of supporting policies.
York Region has adopted the minimum 40% residential intensification target (Region wide) and the Urban Growth Centre density target as part of the Region’s 2031 Intensification Strategy which will be used as the basis to update the Regional Official Plan’s intensification policies.
The York Region 2031 Intensification Strategy, adopted by
Regional Council in February 2009 (See Appendix ‘A’), includes a set of
“Principles of Intensification” and Local Municipal Intensification Targets
required to achieve the 40% intensification target of the Provincial Growth
Plan. Most of the intensification units
identified in the Region’s Strategy are assigned to the municipalities in
southern York Region. The Strategy proposes targets for
The Strategy also includes a Regional Intensification Matrix Framework which has been formulated to help local municipalities in identifying potential intensification areas. The Matrix Framework allocates anticipated intensification in a hierarchical manner, with Regional Centres having the highest intensity of development compared with other identified locations or forms of intensification.
Regional Intensification Matrix Framework
Regional Centres |
Regional Corridors |
GO Stations |
Local Centres & Corridors |
Other Major Corridors |
Local Infill |
Secondary Suites |
A strategy is necessary to guide
The strategy must provide overall direction on where intensification should occur, the amount of development that is appropriate, and the anticipated phasing of new development, having regard for the emphasis the Province and Region have placed on intensification as the means of encouraging the development of urban centres and corridors at densities which can support transit. The strategy details will be subsequently refined in Secondary Plans or more locally focused area studies. Intensification must be planned for and guided by Town policies and requirements, and be directed to preferred locations at transit nodes and along transit corridors.
The scope of
Other Town studies and initiatives must reflect and build on the strategy, particularly in regard to community infrastructure to foster complete communities.
Work is underway on a Town of
Markham Intensification Analysis
Since the Spring of 2007, Staff has
been analyzing potential intensification opportunities within the Town’s
Current Settlement Area guided by senior government growth management and
transportation policy directions, the Town’s Official Plan and Council’s comment
and direction. In November of 2007, Council included the analysis as part of
the Growth Management Strategy to be prepared for
The intensification analysis is proceeding in the following 5 phases:
Phase 1 – Background Research and
Orientation to Height and Density Options
Phase 2 – Techniques and
Classification of Intensification Opportunities
Phase 3 - Identification and Modeling of
Intensification Potential
Phase 4 – Input to Growth Options
Phase 5 – Finalizing the Intensification Strategy and
Implementation Framework
Phase 1 – Background Research and Orientation to Height and Density Options
This phase set out the Provincial
and Regional context for intensification as well as the structural elements
that currently guide development within
In September 2007, Staff provided the Development Services Committee with an overview of background research completed on applying height and density in potential intensification areas within the Town’s Current Settlement Area. At the same time, Staff provided an outline of height and density options to assist the Committee in understanding the potential impact of increased height and density while focusing on the quality of design, function and livability of a more compact urban form. Particular attention was given to increasing lot coverage, especially in support of mid-rise buildings, while still achieving significant density, and on limiting floor plate size for taller buildings to support “point tower” forms.
To be successful and meet community expectations, increases in building height and density must be paired with good urban design. With this in mind, the following considerations for increases in development height and density were identified:
· Height and density are related but distinct, based on factors affecting:
- site organization and building placement, site and building design
- lot coverage (footprint)
- gross floor area (footprint x the number of storeys)
- on-site open space
- parking requirements and location (surface vs. structured vs. underground)
· Increasing lot coverage can reduce building height and still achieve density
· Built Form Principles:
- massing of “slab” building compared with “point tower” form
- limiting heights of slab buildings to mid-rise and reducing floor plate size of tall buildings to achieve point tower forms
- separation distance between buildings
- height of tower components (base/middle/top)
- relationship between building height and street (human scale, views, solar access, good relationship of building to street at 1:1 ratio and canyon effect of slabs at street level above 1:1 ratio) – pedestrian friendly
- transit supportive
- podium forms compared to sheer wall forms or with the use of terracing
- transition of height (gradation of density, replicating built form)
In June, 2007, Staff also provided the Committee with a
Density Study, highlighting examples of height and density of residential,
office, mixed-use, live-work within
Recognizing the importance of good urban design for new
intensification areas in
As part of the intensification analysis, the consultant retained to complete a Built Form, Massing and Height study will also “test” select locations identified for potential intensification. Among other things, this study will focus on pedestrian-friendly, transit oriented development and demonstrate how policies relating to transition and urban design can be introduced in the Town’s secondary plan or more localized studies to ensure that new development adjacent to existing neighbourhoods respects the character and scale of the neighbourhood. Intensification projects also often demand a flexible, site-specific response to implement principles of good building and site design and planning of streets. Therefore, the study will highlight any potential conflict with Region and Town standards, practices and by-laws that may need to be addressed.
The Built Form, Massing and Height Study complements work already underway on Secondary Plans, urban design guidelines, and open space/public realm master plans across the Town at various locations such as Markham Centre, Langstaff Gateway, Cornell Centre, the Yonge/Steeles Corridor and the Highway 7 Precinct Plan between Warden Avenue and the CNR(Uxbridge Subdivision) rail corridor.
Increasing population density in intensification areas must be coupled with public infrastructure that can accommodate the increased activities of additional residents and ensure sufficient amenity space is provided. A further study has been initiated to determine appropriate applications of the provisions of Section 37 of the Planning Act (bonusing for height and density) to secure a range of public benefits in return for increased height and/or density.
Phase 2 – Techniques and Classification of Intensification
Opportunities
In April 2008, Staff provided Development Services Committee with a presentation of assumptions and methods applied when considering intensification opportunities. These included several provisos relating to the consideration of intensification:
·
Consideration of locations for intensification
does not mean that intensification will be approved, or that an entire location
may be suitable for intensification;
·
The potential to accommodate intensification at
a given location does not mean that its realization is a priority for the Town,
or that it will be acted on in the market place;
·
If the overall potential to intensify exceeds
the need or the demand, priorities will need to be established to direct
intensification to preferred locations;
·
Intensification at locations that have reduced
impacts on infrastructure or which justify infrastructure investment are likely
to be preferred;
·
Intensification needs to be appropriate to the
context in which it occurs; the built form of development – its height and
density, the change and mix of uses involved, the relationship to surrounding
community design and function, etc.; and,
·
Intensification must positively impact the
Town’s economy and not result in losses in essential economic activity and a
reduced range of jobs.
The intensification analysis is focused on the Current Settlement Area and takes into account areas where intensification is unlikely to occur, or to be proposed by the Town, as well as locations where intensification may be proposed by policy or preference to meet Town planning objectives.
A key aspect of identifying intensification potential is the relationship to higher order rapid transit facilities. In this regard, the analysis takes account of the Region of York Intensification Matrix Framework which organizes intensification potential relative to specific policies in the Provincial Growth Plan and the Regional Official Plan. Elements of the Regional Hierarchy are included in the organization of intensification areas in the analysis. In addition to this hierarchy, the Town’s analysis considers:
· locations currently approved for intensification,
· locations that are being studied for intensification,
·
· development proposals incorporating intensification, and,
· business parks (employment intensification only) and strategic retail sites.
Concurrently, the analysis is confirming locations considered to have “No Potential” for intensification, including established residential areas and components of the Greenway System where intensification is not needed or required.
Using District specific area mapping, Staff completed a preliminary analysis of intensification areas highlighting Urban Growth Centres/Regional Centres, potential Key Development Areas along Avenue Seven, Yonge Street and the Warden Avenue Regional Transit Corridors, and other potential intensification areas in Local Centres and Corridors along Bayview Ave, Steeles Ave , Kennedy Rd, Markham Rd and other Major Corridors and at GO, Viva and subway stations.
This provided a preliminary Town-wide screening assessment of parcel size, coverage and Floor Space Index for existing urban residential, commercial and industrial lands within the urban area with potential intensification areas mapping superimposed on it.
Input was also obtained from Town planning Staff and Councillors on:
· appropriateness of identified intensification area;
· type of development best suited for the area;
· level of intensification, ie. tolerance of increased height and density;
· investigation of both residential and employment intensification opportunities;
· current development proposals; and
· possible timeframes for phasing in of intensification over time.
Phase 3 - Identification and
Modeling of Intensification Potential
Potential Benefits of Intensification
Intensification, or increasing the density of development within the Town’s current settlement area can occur in a number of ways:
· through redevelopment of under-utilized lands;
· infill of vacant lands or spaces between existing buildings;
· expansion or conversion of existing buildings; and
· development or redevelopment of large land areas within the Town’s current settlement area (eg. the Markham Centre and Langstaff Gateway lands).
Intensification has a number of potential benefits. More compact and intense development within the Town’s Current Settlement Area may:
· provide for higher density, mixed use and transit supportive development which improves land use efficiency and creates more sustainable communities;
· reduce reliance on the automobile by providing transit supportive densities which make it more feasible to provide efficient public transit;
· result in more efficient use of existing infrastructure and reduce expenditures on servicing of new infrastructure in undeveloped areas of the Town;
· provide for a variety of housing forms to help meet the needs of a growing and diversifying population and offer more affordable housing choices; and
· slow the rate at which land outside of the current settlement area is developed for residential use.
Analysis of Intensification Potential
Part of the work toward developing an intensification
strategy for
· community priorities outlined for the Town’s Growth Management Strategy;
· senior government initiatives for growth management and transit infrastructure;
· demographic trends such as an aging population and an increased diversity of households;
· economic trends and land prices that impact market choices; and
· typical constraints to intensification including community acceptance, urban design issues and infrastructure service issues.
Markham’s Intensification Principles
Staff recommend that the following principles be endorsed by
the Development Services Committee and be used to finalize a Town of
1. Redefine the Town’s urban structure to manage intensification within the current settlement area without significantly impacting the Town’s existing structure of residential neighbourhoods and business parks.
2. Intensify and improve the mix of development and direct it to designated centres and corridors which are well served and connected by rapid transit to improve land use efficiency and create more sustainable communities.
3. Intensification should coincide with the delivery of high order public transit as a reliable, sustainable travel alternative and result in the creation of mixed use, pedestrian friendly, liveable communities that are transit supportive and incorporate sustainable development practices.
4. Established residential areas and designated employment areas should be protected from residential intensification; preserve identified natural features from all intensification.
5. Focus intensification in areas that have a reduced impact on Town infrastructure, or which justify investment in new and sustainable infrastructure.
6. Intensify development within the Town’s Current Settlement Area and limit land for intensified uses outside of the Town’s Current Settlement Area.
7. Retain employment serving Town residents and businesses in new development and create live-work opportunities through mixed use development.
8. Intensification will need to be prioritized, directed and phased to preferred Intensification Areas.
9. Improve connectivity by providing a street network/public realm that is more conducive to transit, cycling and pedestrian use, to reduce reliance on the automobile as a preferred mode of transportation.
10. Intensification needs to be appropriate to the area context in which it occurs, the built form of development, its height and density, the appropriate mix of uses involved, and the relationship to the surrounding community form and function.
Markham’s Intensification Hierarchy
An Intensification Hierarchy will provide a framework to
guide development of a Town of
The intensification analysis takes into account the intensification hierarchy and strategy guide developed by the Region of York, in consultation with local municipalities. This is a policy regime that encourages allotting density in a hierarchical manner with Regional Centres having the highest intensity of development, followed by Regional Corridors, GO stations, Local Centres and Corridors and Local Infill.
In addition to this approach the Town’s analysis considers current Town policy areas and the potential for residential intensification in study locations and current development proposals. The intensification analysis does not consider intensification in established residential areas, identified natural features or residential intensification in designated office and industrial lands.
Where Residential Intensification can be Accommodated in
Current Settlement Area
Figure 1,
Figure 2,
Staff has recommended that the proportion should be in the order of 55% of the Town’s residential unit potential built during the period between 2015 and 2031 (in accordance with the Provincial Growth Plan intensification requirement). This proportion would exceed the proportion of 52% proposed for Markham by the Region of York, in order to meet the Region’s minimum 40% intensification requirement, set by the Provincial Growth Plan, and is consistent with the Council’s focus on containing growth within the current settlement area.
Current estimates suggest that a proportion of 55%, applied to a forecast of Town unit development in the period between 2015 and 2031 could represent approximately 23000 to 25000 units. If the potential prior to 2015 is included, the overall intensification potential could be in the order of 30000 units over the entire forecast period from 2006 to 2031. However, these estimates are subject to future economic circumstances, market preferences and development phasing that will affect actual unit production over the entire period to 2031. It is also important to recognize that some intensification areas currently under consideration, in particular the large capacity Urban Growth Centres, could, depending on their phasing, have the potential to continue to develop and contribute additional units, well beyond 2031.
Figure 2 compares the intensification potential of several components of the intensification hierarchy. Comparing the total intensification potential, it shows that the largest proportion of residential intensification units (44%) could be achieved in the two Regional Centres of Markham Centre and the Langstaff Gateway. These Urban Growth Centres are planned for the highest concentration and greatest mix of uses in the Region, a range of housing and employment opportunities, and to be a focus for strategic investment in transit. Both of these centres also contain interfaces for multiple rail and bus transit services, and have been identified as Mobility Hubs in the Metrolinx Regional Transportation Infrastructure Plan. In addition to accommodating a significant share of the Provincial residential intensification target requirements, current planning for these provincially designated Urban Growth Centres will exceed the minimum Provincial density target of 200 people and jobs per hectare by 2031.
The next largest proportion of potential residential
intensification units (33%) could be accommodated in the Key Development Areas (KDA’s)
along the Avenue Seven and Yonge Street Regional Transit Corridors. These KDA’s
include Cornell Centre, the Yonge/Steeles Corridor, Commerce Valley/Galleria,
Markville, Woodbine/404 and the Yonge North Corridor. These Regional Corridors are the main
arteries of the Regional structure and the preferred routes for higher order
rapid transit lines through
The balance of the potential residential intensification units (23%) could occur along the Major Corridors of Markham Road, Steeles Avenue and Kennedy Road, where the adjoining pattern of development can accommodate change, and in the Local Centres and Corridors of Fairtree East-Parkview Centre, Milliken Centre (Main Street), Thornhill Centre, Cathedraltown Centre and Cornell North Centre, Kennedy Corridor – Berczy, which contain a mix of activities like Regional Centres but on a smaller scale and serving the adjacent community. Both the Major Corridors and Local Centres and Corridors are served by local transit offering connections to higher order transit and in some cases contain GO stations.
Finally, there is the potential for appropriate local infill
and for second suites. Local infill in
Local infill might also include redevelopment of some older retail sites and isolated parcels of sufficient size. The most likely candidate sites will adjoin arterial and collector roads which have transit service. Intensification of such sites is likely to be more challenging in terms of finding development forms appropriate to their context, but their intensification may have less impact on infrastructure because of their small scale. It should also be an objective to retain retail and service uses where they currently exist, as a component of any redevelopment, to ensure these continue to serve the surrounding community, supporting complete communities. Again, the potential contribution from local infill is relatively small, but offers more localized opportunities at a more modest scale, to contribute to the evolution of the Town’s housing stock.
Infill, via second suites is encouraged in both Provincial
and Regional policy, and is recognized in the Town’s Official Plan. Many existing second suites in
Most
Where Employment Intensification can be Accommodated in
Current Settlement Area
The focus of employment intensification in the analysis is on established business park areas and strategic retail sites, especially where these relate to Regional Corridors and form part of Key Development Areas or Regional Centres. The analysis assesses the potential for both dispersed employment infill and intensification in Key Development Areas. The analysis does not consider residential intensification in established business parks.
Like residential intensification, employment intensification is market sensitive and driven by the economics of both land development and business operational priorities. Government policies and directions have less direct impact on employment intensification, than in the case of residential intensification. Employment intensification will only occur if it is consistent with the accommodation requirements of businesses, and depends on a decision by a property owner or business to alter current development and business arrangements.
Current estimates by the Region of York suggest that about
65000 additional jobs might be accommodated within
Phase 4 – Input to Growth Options (Staff are currently working on Phase
4)
The results of the analysis of potential residential
intensification opportunities indicate that it would be appropriate to direct a
share of the total additional residential units identified in the Regional
forecast for
Considering the entire planning period from 2006 to 2031, the analysis suggests that the Town could also meet or exceed 55% intensification throughout the whole 25 year period, if the market for higher density housing is sufficiently strong. However, the analysis also suggests that more of the potential residential intensification opportunities occur later in the forecast period to 2031, and beyond 2031, as the market interest in higher density housing forms is expected to strengthen, over the long term.
Staff is reviewing the
Phase 5 – Finalizing
the Intensification Strategy and Implementation Framework
Once Council has endorsed a Town
of
· Intensification Principles including Building Form, Height and Massing
· Intensification Hierarchy
· Intensification Targets for each identified Intensification Area
· Implementation Strategies or key actions that address planning policy and tools, financial policy and tools, infrastructure policy and investment programs.
The planning policy actions might include area studies and secondary plan reviews that would address, in detail, area specific land use intensification policies and built form, massing and height guidelines; revisions to parkland and parking standards; and the use of various Planning Act tools such as pre-zoning of Intensification Areas, Height and Density Bonusing, Community Improvement Plans, Development Permit Systems, etc.
The financial policy and tools might include the application of Tax Incentives and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and possible revisions to the Development Charges Act to better account for the cost of establishing a new urban structure and services. A review of current financial policy and tools could form part of the Finance Department’s financial impact analysis linked to the Town’s preferred Growth Management Strategy.
The infrastructure policy and investment programs might explore under which circumstances the Town would be prepared to support the cost of infrastructure front-ending, in which intensification areas it may be appropriate, and what it will take to make it happen. Review of current infrastructure policy and programs relative to intensification can form part of the Markham Strategic Transportation Plan, the Master Servicing Study, the Integrated Leisure Master Plan, Community Safety Plan and the Community Sustainability Plan (Green Print).
FINANCIAL TEMPLATE:
Not applicable.
ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
The Intensification Strategy is a component of the Growth Management Strategy which implements the Growth Management Priority, and addresses both the Transportation/Transit and Environment Priorities established in Building Markham’s Future Together.
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDED BY:
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of |
|
Jim
Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
Appendix A –
Figure
1 –
Figure
2 -
Q:\Development\Planning\MISC\MI
510 Growth Management 05-06\Reports\DSC GMS March 24 2009 Intensification
Strategy.doc