
Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: June 16, 2009
SUBJECT: Environmental
Policy Review and Consolidation Study
Final Report and Recommendations
PREPARED BY: Lilli
Duoba, Senior Project Coordinator
Environmental Planning
& Rouge Park
RECOMMENDATION:
That the staff report entitled
Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study Final Report and
Recommendations, dated June 16, 2009 be received;
And that the Environmental Policy
Review and Consolidation Final Report and Policy Framework be endorsed in
principle as the basis and framework for finalizing the Greenway System and
policy directions to be included in the Town’s Growth Management Strategy for
implementation through the Town’s new Official Plan Review;
And that Staff continue to work
with stakeholders to confirm natural heritage and hydrologic features through
the Official Plan Review including potential site visits where warranted,
subject to the costs for any necessary participation of the Town’s consultants
for this level of detailed site specific review to be the responsibility of the
landowner;
And that Staff be authorized and
directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Town of Markham Environmental
Policy Review and Consolidation Study was undertaken
to develop new mapping products and a new framework for environmental and
natural heritage policies for inclusion in the new Official Plan. The framework identifies a Town-wide Greenway
System and protection policies for natural heritage and hydrological features. It also includes Greenbelt Plan conformity
policies including Greenbelt
agricultural policies, proposed Hamlet boundary adjustments and land use
designations for defined Special Policy Areas.
Although the study was initiated in 2004, considerable time was
needed to resolve the Provincial Greenbelt Plan planning process and
negotiations needed for the settlement of Official Plan Amendment No. 140
(Rouge North Management Area). The study
team included a multi-disciplinary team of consultants led by Schollen
& Company Inc. A
Technical Advisory Committee was established to provide feedback at key study
milestones and the process included numerous public information meeting and
issue-specific meetings and presentations.
There has been extensive public
and landowner consultation to date, and public input will continue through the
Growth Management Strategy and the Official Plan Review.
The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study is a
key component of the Town’s Growth Management Strategy. Once the Town has adopted a Growth Management
Strategy, an Official Plan Review process will be initiated to prepare a new
Official Plan for the Town and to implement the Growth Management Strategy
recommendations. The Greenway System and
policy directions and framework will form part of the new Official Plan.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to present
to Council for endorsation the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation
Study recommendations and obtain Council approval in principle to continue to
advance the study recommendations through the Town’s Growth Management Strategy
and the future Official Plan review process.
BACKGROUND:
In 2004, Council
authorized the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study. This study was designed to extend
environmental policy protection to the Town’s rural area, but has evolved to
become a comprehensive Town-wide Natural Heritage Strategy incorporating the
Greenbelt Plan conformity requirements.
The amount of time undertaken to deliver the study recommendations is
attributable to refinements in the study process to accommodate the Province’s
completion of the Greenbelt Plan planning process and the negotiations needed
for the settlement of Official Plan Amendment No. 140 (Rouge North Management
Area).
The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study supports
the requirements of the Provincial Policy Statement, the Provincial Growth Plan
for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and the Greenbelt Plan. The study consolidates the myriad existing
policies that the Town has adopted through various official plan amendments and
addresses the natural heritage planning policies and requirements of the TRCA
and upper tier governments (Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority and the Region of York).
A copy of the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation
Study Executive Summary is attached as Appendix ‘A’. The entire consultants report is available
through an electronic link to the Development Services Committee agenda and
will be posted on the Town’s website.
OPTIONS/ DISCUSSION:
Extensive Public Consultation
Process Undertaken
The EPRC Study was
designed to proceed in three phases with opportunities for Council commentary
and public input at all key milestones of the study process. Three public information meetings were held
in June 2007, December 2008 and April 2009.
In addition, Technical Advisory meetings, agency meetings and Provincial
ministry meetings were held through the study process. In December 2008, and again April 2009, full
day one-on-one focus group meetings were held with all interested stakeholders
to identify site specific issues and provide the opportunity to engage in more
detailed discussion regarding the mapping and draft policies. Town staff and the study team, landowners
and their consultants and the TRCA participated in field verification visits to
address site specific issues in 2008 and 2009.
The site visits in 2008 were
specifically targeted to address the settlement of the OPA No. 140 Ontario
Municipal Board hearing and were related to the delineation of the Preliminary Rouge Park boundary.
The field verification visits in 2009 were to verify the status of significant
existing natural heritage features that required further review. Throughout the process, mapping adjustments
were made and the policy framework modified to reflect public input where minor
modifications were justified. The
Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study mapping products were also
available for review at the Town’s Growth Management Open Houses (see Figures 1
to 3).
Additional public consultation
opportunities will be made available to the public and stakeholders through the
ongoing Growth Management Strategy and the future Official Plan Review process.
The summary of the public
responses received to date is attached as Appendix ‘B’.
Region of York
Official Plan
The Region of York is preparing a
new draft Regional Official Plan containing regional scale Greenlands mapping
and policies including Greenbelt
conformity policies. Town staff will
continue to work with Regional staff to ensure the integration of regional and
local Greenlands policies and mapping into the Town’s framework.
Environmental Management
Policies, Special Policy Area Land Use Designation
and Hamlets to be Updated
The draft recommendations for a
proposed policy and directions framework includes an organization model for
general environmental management policies incorporating policies to address
sustainability, soil conservation, urban forestry, air quality, waste
management, noise and vibration. Some of
these policies would be new to the Official Plan and some would represent
updates to existing policies. These
policies will be reviewed further with staff at the Official Plan process stage
to obtain input and reflect current studies, programs and priorities.
The Town’s Special Policy Area (SPA)
policies are currently reflected as a separate land use designation on Schedule
‘A’ – LAND USE to the Official Plan.
This is the approach adopted by the Town in 1990 with the approval of Official
Plan Amendment No. 100. Most of the Special Policy Areas have now
redeveloped and it is appropriate to reflect the existing land use designation
on Schedule ‘A’ – LAND USE to the Official Plan together with an SPA
overlay. This is the approach used by
most municipalities who have Special Policy Areas within their
jurisdiction. It provides clearer direction
to staff and landowners on land use permissions while ensuring the requirements
of the Special Policy Area are met. The
land use designation for the SPA lands will reflect the uses contained within
the operative Secondary Plans (Unionville Core Area, South
Unionville and Markham Centre), applicable Zoning By-laws and
existing uses. There are no changes
proposed to the Special Policy Area boundaries (SPA boundaries were revised in
2006 by Official Plan Amendment No. 153) or policies at this time. The proposed Special Policy Area
designations are identified in Figure ‘6’.
The Greenbelt Plan provides
municipalities with a single, one-time opportunity to adjust the boundaries of Hamlets
located within the Greenbelt Plan area to rationalize these relative to the Greenbelt
policies. The affected Hamlets include
Locust Hill, Cedar Grove, Almira and Dickson Hill. In discussion with Development Services
Committee, staff were asked to review a potential expansion of the Locust Hill
Hamlet eastward as an opportunity to address Rouge
Park uses and potential heritage
building relocations. This opportunity
has been identified and staff will review this option in the context of the
future Official Plan Review process. Figure
‘2’ – Greenway Components reflects the proposed boundaries for the
Hamlets. All landowners within the
existing and proposed Hamlet boundaries were given notice of the Phase 2 public
information meeting held on April 29,
2009. The Hamlet policies
are not being reviewed under this process, but are anticipated to be reviewed
through the Town’s future comprehensive Official Plan Review process.
Town’s Greenway System Strategy
Approach
Municipalities are empowered
through Provincial legislation to develop natural heritage system policies and
mapping to implement provincial, regional, agency and local policies and
programs. The Greenway System strategy
for the Town of Markham was
prepared to support a linked and connected system of natural heritage and
hydrological features and the lands needed to support the function of these
features. The Greenway System protects
the Town’s waterways, woodlands and wetlands, provides for a major east-west
ecological corridor connecting natural features and subwatersheds, provides for
enhanced biodiversity nodes to protect natural heritage and hydrological
features and wildlife habitats and protects agricultural lands in the Greenbelt.
The systems approach to natural
heritage planning uses ecological planning principles and is a well recognized
planning tool. Natural Heritage Systems
planning is used at all levels of government including local, regional and
provincial scale planning, and was also used in the Town’s Natural Features
Study undertaken in 1993. Figure ‘4’
identifies the Regional Context and illustrates the how the natural heritage systems
approach extends beyond the municipal boundaries.
The Greenway System and the
Components
The Town’s proposed Greenway System includes natural
features, water features and additional lands necessary to support the
long-term sustainability and function of these features. Lands within the proposed Greenway System are
not available for urban land development, but may support existing residential,
rural and agricultural uses. The system would
also include all the lands identified by the Province within the Greenbelt
Plan. The proposed Greenway System is
further identified in 3 distinct policy management areas:
·
Natural Heritage Network (NHN)
·
Natural Heritage Network Enhancement (NHNE)
·
Greenbelt Agriculture
(GA)
The Oak Ridges Moraine
Conservation Plan has already been implemented through Official Plan Amendment
No. 117 and is recommended to be retained as a separate designation. No
changes in the ORM policies (now approved by the Province) are proposed. Table 1 identifies the land areas within the
Town.
Table 1
Land Statistics of the Proposed Greenway
System
|
Area (hectares)
|
Percentage of the Town
|
Greenway System made up of:
|
6,830
|
32%
|
Natural Heritage
Network
|
5,336
|
25%
|
Greenbelt
Agriculture
|
1,494
|
7%
|
Natural Heritage
Network
Enhancement (estimated)
|
134
|
.5%
|
Oak Ridges Moraine
|
601
|
3%
|
Total (Greenway, Enhancement and ORM)
|
7,565
|
35.5%
|
The proposed Greenway System (see
Figure ‘1’) was delineated at a Town-wide scale using government and agency
data through a desk top and GIS process.
The Greenway System boundaries are subject to confirmation through
future detailed site and secondary plan level studies. The consulting team and the Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority have confirmed a few sites in the field at
the request of the landowners where the mapped features were significant and warranted
further review. As the Town moves
forward to implement the proposed Greenway System through the Official Plan, further
minor mapping adjustments can be made where warranted and justified. Vegetative Protection Zones and buffers have
not been applied to the features contained in the Natural Heritage
Network with the exception of the watercourses within the Rouge watershed which
have been delineated using the Rouge Park
boundary delineation criteria which includes the buffer areas. The Vegetative Protective Zone requirements are
identified in the draft policies and will reflect the buffer requirements of
the Greenbelt Plan and recognized Provincial and Town buffer standards for
woodlots, wetlands and non-Rouge tributaries.
Natural Heritage Network (NHN)
The Natural Heritage Network (NHN)
is the major component of the Greenway System.
The NHN is shown on Figure ‘2’, Greenway
Components Map. The Natural Heritage Network
includes the following components:
•
Flood plain lands, watercourse and stream corridors
•
Wetlands meeting Provincial or TRCA criteria
•
Woodlands meeting Provincial, Regional, TRCA and
Town criteria including zoned woodlots
•
Meadows that are contiguous with a valley corridor
or other listed feature
•
Naturalized stormwater management ponds that are
contiguous with a valley corridor or other listed feature
•
Habitat for species of special concern, threatened
and endangered species and species ranked by the TRCA as L1 to L3 that is
contiguous with a valley corridor or other listed feature
•
Environmentally Significant Areas identified by the
TRCA
•
Locally Significant Areas identified by the Town
•
Environmental Protection Areas identified by the
Town
•
Rouge North Management Lands delineated in
accordance with OPA No. 140
•
Greenbelt lands along
the Bruce, Berczy, Robinson, Mount Joy and
Little Rouge Creeks
It is the long-term intent that
lands contained within the Natural Heritage
Network are to be protected for natural heritage and open space purposes. However, it is recognized that some of the
Natural Heritage Network lands contained in
the Rouge North and Greenbelt Plan Area are used for existing residential and
agricultural purposes. These uses will
be permitted, and are expected to continue unencumbered, until such time as
adjacent land uses change. In future, as
lands adjacent to the Natural Heritage Network
maybe approved for development, and continued agriculture in not feasible due
to fragmentation, the Natural Heritage Network
lands will be conveyed into public ownership, where possible and feasible, and
managed as part of the Town’s natural and open space system. Where it is not possible to acquire lands in
public ownership, the lands will be protected for natural heritage purposes in
private ownership and existing uses will be permitted to continue. The Province has supported in principle the
Greenbelt Plan area river corridors in the west and north area of the Town, being
incorporated into the Natural Heritage Network,
supporting the long-term vision for natural heritage lands subject to allowing
the continuation of existing agricultural uses.
Figure ‘3’, reflects the feature
and policy layers that were used to build the Greenway System. The features layers were derived from
numerous sources and have differing levels of accuracy (e.g. Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority data are presented at a jurisdiction scale
and relies on field work to confirm boundaries). Where the Town has been able to refine the
natural heritage layers through previous decisions of Council and site visits,
the refinements are reflected on the Figure ‘1’ Greenway System and Figure ‘2’
Greenway Components. Staff have been
asked by a number of stakeholders to undertake detailed review as possible
corrections to the features mapping.
These features reflect the layers produced by supporting agencies and
upper tier governments, and represent the data used to develop the NHN. Figure ‘3’ does not need to be revised at
this time, as it is not intended to form an operative component of the future
Official Plan. The basis for the
Greenway System is duly reflected on Figures ‘1’ and ‘2’, and any future
refinements or corrections to detailed mapping can be accommodated through the
Official Plan Review and potentially also in any future Secondary Plans and
development approvals.
Natural Heritage Network –
Enhancement Areas
The Natural Heritage Network
Enhancement lands are shown conceptually on the Greenway Components Map (see
Figure ‘2’). Enhancement lands are lands that currently do
not contain natural heritage or hydrological features, but which have been
identified as providing further support to the Greenway System to address the
Town’s biodiversity and linkage objectives.
Enhancement core lands are identified in areas adjacent to significant
natural features. The additional lands
assist in creating larger natural areas necessary to retain the existing amount
and diversity of flora and fauna, if and when lands uses become urbanized in
the future. Enhancement lands were
identified by the consulting team using both ecological principles for
biodiversity centres, as well as the Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy
mapping.
The most northerly proposed
ecological enhancement corridor area creates a 200 metre wide ecological
corridor connecting the Little Rouge Creek to the Berczy Creek. The location of the proposed corridor builds on
an already robust base of existing natural heritage and hydrological features which
minimizes the additional enhancement land requirements needed to achieve the
corridor. The ecological corridor connects
into Richmond Hill, Whitchurch-Stouffville,
Pickering and Toronto
(see Figure ‘2’). The second ecological
corridor is proposed to connect the Little Rouge Creek corridor to the
Provincially Significant Wetland located between McCowan
Road and the Little Rouge Creek. The study consultants have identified the
need for an ecological corridor in this area to ensure the wetland does not
become isolated should urban development occur at a future date. The ecological connection at this location
could easily be accommodated at the north end of the wetland providing the
shortest distance or further south connecting to the Greenbelt Plan area ‘finger’
located west of Highway 48. The enhancement
connection is shown conceptually at the north end of the woodlot, but it is
recognized that this connection will be subject to further review through a
future Secondary Plan exercise and Environmental Management Study process.
In Phase 2 of the study process,
the Natural Heritage Network incorporated a multi-use activity linkage
connecting the Little Rouge Creek to the Bruce
Creek. This connection is proposed to function as a
pedestrian, open space corridor which could provide some ecological
benefits. After further review, it was
determined that the principle of mid-block multi-use connections is already
established in the Town’s urban design guidelines and that this should continue
to be supported as a Town-wide urban design principle.
Overall, the NHN provides a
comprehensive solution to protecting the Town’s natural features in the long term
within an ecologically-based natural heritage system. It not only protects and connects natural
features within the Town, but links them to the larger regional landscape
through connections to the Rouge Park,
Oak Ridges Moraine and Seaton Natural Heritage System.
Greenbelt Agriculture
– Greenbelt
Conformity
The Provincial Greenbelt Plan was
released by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing in February
2005. The accompanying Greenbelt
Protection Act requires that local and regional municipalities implement the
Greenbelt Plan within 5 years through their Official Plan review
processes. The Environmental Policy
Review and Consolidation Study incorporates the Greenbelt Plan requirements
within the Greenway System framework.
The Greenbelt Plan designates all
the lands within the Greenbelt Plan area as Protected Countryside, Oak Ridges
Moraine and Niagara Escarpment. In Markham,
the lands are further identified as Natural Heritage
System except for a cemetery on Steeles Avenue east
of Reesor Road, and a
property on Highway 7 (Locust Hill).
The Natural Heritage System is a
Provincial overlay which supports natural heritage and hydrological features
and functions. The Province intends that
the Natural Heritage System be an overlay of
the Protected Countryside designation and that agricultural uses permitted by
local Official Plans continue to be permitted subject to the constraints of the
Natural Heritage System. The Greenbelt Plan permits both agricultural
uses and natural heritage protection and enhancement in the eastern Markham
Greenbelt lands, but does not provide direction with respect to where these
specific uses should be located.
Because of the significant public
ownership of lands in eastern Markham
and the need for agricultural certainty to ensure long-term sustainability, the
consulting team have recommended an approach to provide more certainty to
natural heritage and agricultural lands and ensure Town policies support the
Rouge Park Management Plans. The
strategy being recommended includes the delineation of the Natural Heritage
Network on the eastern Greenbelt Plan Area lands providing primacy for natural
heritage protection and park related uses, but also providing a clear policy
context for the continuation of existing long-term agriculture uses within the
Natural Heritage Network. The remainder
of the lands in the eastern Greenbelt
area are proposed for a Greenbelt Agriculture designation which would identify
the primacy of the lands for agricultural purposes, allowing natural heritage
restoration as a secondary and complementary use. This approach recognizes and supports
agricultural uses through the entire Greenbelt Plan area, but provides greater
certainty for long-term agriculture to continue on the lands identified as Greenbelt
Agriculture. This approach is also
consistent with the Town’s current Agricultural designation in the Official
Plan. The policies of the Greenbelt Plan
can be fully implemented within this framework.
The Town has had several meetings
with Provincial and Rouge Park
representatives to discuss an appropriate policy approach for these lands. The Greenbelt Plan states that minor rounding
out of the Natural Heritage System is permitted, but the Province is concerned
that the Town’s proposed approach is more extensive than the rounding out
contemplated by the Province. It should
be noted that the Town has included all natural heritage and hydrological
features, as well as vegetation protection zones captured through the Rouge
Park boundary delineation criteria,
in the Natural Heritage Network and the remaining lands are identified as agricultural
lands. The Town’s proposed approach
simply distinguishes the land uses in a manner which provides for greater
certainty and supports the overall intent of the Greenbelt Plan. Agricultural land uses and natural heritage
restoration are distinct uses which although complementary within an area and
landscape context, can become conflicting uses at the site level. The challenge with the approach being recommended
by the Province for a Natural Heritage System overlay over the entire Greenbelt
Plan area is that, despite the stated goal of protection of agriculture, there
is no certainty for agricultural activity over the long term. Under the policies of the Greenbelt Plan,
there is no provision to direct how lands are to be used, as long as the uses
are consistent with the Plan.
Consequently, the Town would have no policy context to support the use
of ‘prime’ agricultural land for agriculture.
Town staff will continue to work with the Province and Rouge
Park to provide a policy framework
which provides certainty for natural heritage protection, reforestoration and
long-term agricultural uses consistent with the intent of the Greenbelt Plan. The proposed Greenbelt Agricultural area
currently comprises approximately 1,494 hectares, roughly 7% of the total area
of the Town.
The Greenbelt Plan allows
municipalities to refine their rural and prime agricultural designations. All of the agricultural lands in Markham
are identified as Class 1 and 2 which meets the Provincial Policy Statement classification
for Prime lands. The Region is undertaking a LEAR (Land
Evaluation Area Review) classification study as an alternative classification
system to further distinguish prime and rural lands at a more specific level. Although the Regional LEAR has not been
completed, preliminary findings indicate that all lands in Markham
will be classified as ‘prime’. The
Greenbelt Plan is very restrictive with respect to non-agricultural uses on
prime lands and this presents a challenge with respect to the implementation of
the Rouge Park. The Province has confirmed that Section 3.2.6
of the Greenbelt Plan, which acknowledges the Rouge North Management Plan,
gives the Town the authority to prepare policies that support Rouge Park uses
on prime lands, notwithstanding the classification as ‘prime’.
Land Securement
The proposed policy directions and
framework identify a number of mechanisms to protect and secure the proposed
Natural Heritage Network and Enhancement areas into public ownership. These include the traditional and new planning
tools provided through the Planning Act, using
open space intensive uses such as parkland, schools and recreation centres and
outright purchase. The Town has adopted
a Land Securement Strategy to be used to guide Council with environmental land
purchases through the Markham Environmental Land Securement Fund. Given the importance of the Natural Heritage
Network Enhancement lands to the overall system it would be appropriate to identify
these lands as a priority for securement, once the implementing Official Plan
Amendment is approved. The issue of a
fair and equitable land securement strategy has been raised numerous times
throughout the public consultation events. The study identifies a number of tools and
incentives available through the Planning Act
to assist municipalities with protecting and acquiring natural heritage lands.
A Land Securement Strategy will be
an important component for the implementation of the Greenway System. The proposed Natural Heritage Network
Enhancement lands are intended to be identified as a potential
opportunity. If the funding or necessary
incentives are not available to secure the lands for protection as part of
Natural Heritage Network, they may be considered for urban uses, if and when,
urban expansion is contemplated for the adjacent lands.
Monitoring
The EPRC
included a monitoring protocol for the Greenway System for the purpose of
gauging the success of the implementation process and to determine future
restoration priorities. This monitoring would be based on a Geographic Information System (GIS) technology with
the objective of integrating the monitored data with the Town’s Geomatic
database.
It is
proposed that the monitoring information would include the following:
- Delineation of Baseline
Conditions - to a great extent this has been completed through the current
mapping exercise which was undertaken as a part of the EPRC process.
- Review and Update (including
aerial photography interpretation) – this would be undertaken whenever new
aerial photographs became available to the municipality and would probably
occur every two years. Importantly this proposed exercise would provide
greater clarity as to the extent of natural cover (percentage) in Markham and any changes that may occur
over time.
- Tracking of Agency and
Volunteer-based Restoration Projects – Since the advent of the Town’s
Trees for Tomorrow program tracking of trees planted by both the Town and
other volunteer-based restoration projects have been undertaken by the
Operations Branch of the Town. This information includes the number of
trees planted, species composition, location of restoration sites and the
name of the agency or volunteer group undertaking the plantings. This
information will need to be geo-referenced and added to the GIS database.
Matters Requiring Further Review
The endosation of the Environmental
Policy Review and Consolidation study does not in any way impact the ability of
the staff to continue to review the Greenway System mapping and policy
approaches as part of completing a new Official Plan where detailed information
and comments are brought forward.
However, to provide some certainty to landowners who have identified a
significant mapping issue, the specific areas listed below will be reviewed further
as new information is brought forward. These
sites are identified on Figure ‘5’. This
list does not preclude the review of other lands where new information is provided.
1. Natural Heritage/ Agricultural
designations on Greenbelt East Lands (Site 1)
The Rouge
Park is currently undertaking the
Markham East Rouge Park Management Study.
The Town will continue work with the Rouge
Park, Toronto
and Region Conservation Authority and the Province to delineate natural
heritage and agricultural lands in eastern Markham
with an effort to align the boundaries to the extent possible and ensure
greater clarity and certainty for all stakeholders as the Rouge
Park plans are implemented.
2. Romandale Farms (Site 2)
The Romandale Farms property is located on Elgin
Mills Road east of Warden
Avenue and has been identified as a Regionally
Significant Woodlands within the Region’s Significant Woodlands database. Staff have met with the applicant and Toronto
Region Conservation Authority on site and have supported and encouraged a review
the Regional classification in advance of or concurrent with the Official Plan Review
process. Should the classification on
the lands change, the mapping will be adjusted to reflect the revised
delineation prior to the mapping being incorporated into the Regional Official
Plan.
3. Remington Lands (Site 3)
The Remington lands located at
Ninth Line and Steeles Avenue
(Remington Parkview Golf Course) have been further reviewed relative to the
enhancement lands designation and TRCA woodlands layer. The proposed Natural Heritage
Network Enhancement symbol has been applied to a parcel currently used for the
golf course and containing existing trees immediately north of the Rouge Park
lands bounded by the rail line and Rouge River.
The site does not currently have road frontage. The owner has requested that the enhancement
layer be removed. Because of the
development constraints on the land and the connection to the Rouge
Park lands, staff recommend that
the land continue to be identified as Natural Heritage
Network Enhancement lands. The enhancement
symbol is intended to evolve into either the Natural Heritage
Network designation or an urban development designation once further detailed
review is undertaken in the context of a Secondary Plan exercise and Environmental
Management Study or development application and land securement options are
explored. Given the site constraints for
development, it would be premature to remove the symbol at this time.
The Remington lands also contain a
Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority woodlands layer on the golf course lands adjacent to the Ninth
Line. A portion of this woodland is
located beneath the hydro corridor. The
woodlot feature is existing, but the health and sustainability of the feature
may require further review to ascertain the appropriateness of long term
protection. The boundary of the Natural
Heritage Network is subject to confirmation through a Environmental Management Study. This feature can be assessed in more detail
at the development stage.
4. Angus Glen (Site 4)
The Natural Heritage Network
encompasses lands identified as Regionally Significant Woodlands and a TRCA
woodlands layer located north of the Angus Glen Community Centre. The lands are wooded, but are primarily used
for a tree plantation. The boundary of the Natural Heritage Network
is subject to confirmation through Environmental Management Study. This feature can be assessed in more detail at
the development stage.
5. North Markham Landowners
Group
The North Markham
Landowners Group (NMLG) represent a landowners group in north Markham
comprising 860 hectares of land. The NMLG
have participated in the Town’s process and have submitted a detailed letter
addressing policy and technical issues.
Some of the issues raised have been addressed in this report (land
securement, Angus Glen lands and enhancement corridors). Many of the other comments raised are issues
related to policy wording and will be fully considered and addressed in the
next stage of this process when the preparation of a new Official Plan
commences. The Policies, Directions and
Framework contained in the study report are policy directions intended to
provide guidance and discussion. The
specific wording of the policies will be subject to further refinement and
public comment and the comments received will be considered in the first draft
of the Official Plan at the appropriate time.
Some of the policy directions are specific requirements in the Greenbelt
Plan and cannot be altered (e.g. 30 metre vegetation protection zone
requirement for features within the Greenbelt Plan area).
Next Steps – Growth Management
Strategy and New Official Plan Update
The EPRC Study provides a
framework for a Town-wide Greenway System and a policy framework for
implementation within the Growth Management Strategy and the Town’s Official
Plan. The study mapping and draft policy
framework will replace the Town’s current environmental and natural heritage
policies, consolidate the existing Oak Ridges Moraine, Special Policy Area and Rouge
Park policies and introduce the Greenbelt
conformity mapping and policies.
The Greenbelt Act
provides that municipalities must bring their official plans into conformity
with the Greenbelt Plan within the context of Planning Act mandated five year
official plan review. Once the Town has
completed and endorsed the Growth Management Strategy which includes the
Greenway System, an Official Plan Review will be initiated. The proposed Greenway System and associated
policy directions and framework will provide the basis for new natural heritage
polices in the new Official Plan.
Staff heard throughout the study
process that notwithstanding using multiple means of study process notification
(e-mails, website, newspaper notification), many landowners, predominantly in
the rural area, felt the information was not being communicated to all Markham
residents. In order to address this
issue, staff recommend that an enhanced communication program be considered at
the initiation for the Official Plan Amendment process in consultation with the
Town communications Department to ensure a wider circulation of information. This
could comprise an individual mailing or communication at the commencement of
the Official Plan Review process.
Staff will continue to work with
stakeholders to address specific issues related to existing natural heritage
and hydrological features. Where landowners
request site visits to confirm natural heritage or hydrologic features be
undertaken, in advance of the specific study requirements outlined in the draft
policy framework, the cost of any necessary participation of the Town’s
consultants for this level of detailed site specific review will be the
responsibility of the landowner.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
AND TEMPLATE: (external link)
There are no direct financial
implications as a result of this report.
HUMAN
RESOURCES CONSIDERATIONS
Not applicable.
ALIGNMENT
WITH STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
The proposed study is consistent
with the Building Markham’s Future Together
strategic priorities on the Environment and Growth Management and the Town’s
goals for natural heritage protection.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The EPRC study has consulted
widely with external agencies and stakeholders, as well as staff in the
Development, Corporate and Community Services Commissions. Comments provided by internal staff regarding
policy wording will be incorporated into the future draft official plan
policies.
CONCLUSION:
The Environmental Policy
Review and Consolidation Study reflects the direction provided by the Province
for natural heritage planning through the Provincial Policy Statement, Growth
Plan and Greenbelt Plan, reflects the current policies adopted by the Town and
incorporates the requirements of the Region and Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority. The study also reflects Markham’s
priorities for natural heritage protection as identified through “Building
Markham’s Future Together” and supports the recommendations of the Rouge, Don
and Duffins watershed plans. The
Greenway system reflects an innovative, ambitious and scientifically defendable
approach and one which provides greater assurance of protecting the Town’s
natural resources from the impacts of future urbanization.
The full Environmental
Policy Review and Consolation Study Final Report will be available by
electronic link and will be posted on the Town’s website. The Executive Summary is included as Appendix
‘A’.
RECOMMENDED BY:
________________________ ________________________
Valerie Shuttleworth,
M.C.I.P, R.P.P. Jim
Baird, M.C.I.P, R.P.P
Director of Planning
and Urban Design Commissioner of Development Services
ATTACHMENTS:
Figure 1: Greenway System
Figure 2: Greenway Components
Figure 3: Natural Heritage and Hydrological Features and
Policy Layers
Figure 4: Regional Context
Figure 5: Matters Requiring Further Review
Figure 6: Proposed Land Use Designations
for the Special Policy Area
Appendix ‘A’ EPRC Study Executive Summary
Appendix ‘B’ Public Response Summary
Appendix ‘C’ Environmental
Policy Review and Consolidation Study Final Report (electronic link to agenda)
Q:\Development\Planning\MISC\MI494 EPRC Study (Natural
Heritage\Reports\DSC Report June 2009.doc