Report to: Development Services Committee                                  Report Date: June 16, 2009

 

 

SUBJECT:                          Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study
Final Report and Recommendations

PREPARED BY:               Lilli Duoba, Senior Project Coordinator

                                            Environmental Planning & Rouge Park

 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

That the staff report entitled Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study Final Report and Recommendations, dated June 16, 2009 be received;

And that the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Final Report and Policy Framework be endorsed in principle as the basis and framework for finalizing the Greenway System and policy directions to be included in the Town’s Growth Management Strategy for implementation through the Town’s new Official Plan Review; 

 

And that Staff continue to work with stakeholders to confirm natural heritage and hydrologic features through the Official Plan Review including potential site visits where warranted, subject to the costs for any necessary participation of the Town’s consultants for this level of detailed site specific review to be the responsibility of the landowner;

 

And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Town of Markham Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study was undertaken to develop new mapping products and a new framework for environmental and natural heritage policies for inclusion in the new Official Plan.  The framework identifies a Town-wide Greenway System and protection policies for natural heritage and hydrological features.  It also includes Greenbelt Plan conformity policies including Greenbelt agricultural policies, proposed Hamlet boundary adjustments and land use designations for defined Special Policy Areas.

 

Although the study was initiated in 2004, considerable time was needed to resolve the Provincial Greenbelt Plan planning process and negotiations needed for the settlement of Official Plan Amendment No. 140 (Rouge North Management Area).  The study team included a multi-disciplinary team of consultants led by Schollen & Company Inc.  A Technical Advisory Committee was established to provide feedback at key study milestones and the process included numerous public information meeting and issue-specific meetings and presentations.   There has been extensive public and landowner consultation to date, and public input will continue through the Growth Management Strategy and the Official Plan Review.

 

The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study is a key component of the Town’s Growth Management Strategy.  Once the Town has adopted a Growth Management Strategy, an Official Plan Review process will be initiated to prepare a new Official Plan for the Town and to implement the Growth Management Strategy recommendations.  The Greenway System and policy directions and framework will form part of the new Official Plan.

     

1. Purpose                     2. Background                      3. Discussion                        4. Financial        

 

5. Others (HR, Strategic, Affected Units)                                   6. Attachment(s)

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to present to Council for endorsation the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study recommendations and obtain Council approval in principle to continue to advance the study recommendations through the Town’s Growth Management Strategy and the future Official Plan review process. 

 

BACKGROUND:

In 2004, Council authorized the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study.  This study was designed to extend environmental policy protection to the Town’s rural area, but has evolved to become a comprehensive Town-wide Natural Heritage Strategy incorporating the Greenbelt Plan conformity requirements.  The amount of time undertaken to deliver the study recommendations is attributable to refinements in the study process to accommodate the Province’s completion of the Greenbelt Plan planning process and the negotiations needed for the settlement of Official Plan Amendment No. 140 (Rouge North Management Area). 

 

The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study supports the requirements of the Provincial Policy Statement, the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and the Greenbelt Plan.  The study consolidates the myriad existing policies that the Town has adopted through various official plan amendments and addresses the natural heritage planning policies and requirements of the TRCA and upper tier governments (Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Region of York).  

 

A copy of the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study Executive Summary is attached as Appendix ‘A’.   The entire consultants report is available through an electronic link to the Development Services Committee agenda and will be posted on the Town’s website. 

 

OPTIONS/ DISCUSSION:

 

Extensive Public Consultation Process Undertaken

The EPRC Study was designed to proceed in three phases with opportunities for Council commentary and public input at all key milestones of the study process.  Three public information meetings were held in June 2007, December 2008 and April 2009.  In addition, Technical Advisory meetings, agency meetings and Provincial ministry meetings were held through the study process.  In December 2008, and again April 2009, full day one-on-one focus group meetings were held with all interested stakeholders to identify site specific issues and provide the opportunity to engage in more detailed discussion regarding the mapping and draft policies.   Town staff and the study team, landowners and their consultants and the TRCA participated in field verification visits to address site specific issues in 2008 and 2009.   The site visits in 2008 were specifically targeted to address the settlement of the OPA No. 140 Ontario Municipal Board hearing and were related to the delineation of the Preliminary Rouge Park boundary.  The field verification visits in 2009 were to verify the status of significant existing natural heritage features that required further review.  Throughout the process, mapping adjustments were made and the policy framework modified to reflect public input where minor modifications were justified.  The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study mapping products were also available for review at the Town’s Growth Management Open Houses (see Figures 1 to 3). 

 

Additional public consultation opportunities will be made available to the public and stakeholders through the ongoing Growth Management Strategy and the future Official Plan Review process.

 

The summary of the public responses received to date is attached as Appendix ‘B’.

 

Region of York Official Plan

The Region of York is preparing a new draft Regional Official Plan containing regional scale Greenlands mapping and policies including Greenbelt conformity policies.  Town staff will continue to work with Regional staff to ensure the integration of regional and local Greenlands policies and mapping into the Town’s framework.   

 

Environmental Management Policies, Special Policy Area Land Use Designation and Hamlets to be Updated

The draft recommendations for a proposed policy and directions framework includes an organization model for general environmental management policies incorporating policies to address sustainability, soil conservation, urban forestry, air quality, waste management, noise and vibration.  Some of these policies would be new to the Official Plan and some would represent updates to existing policies.  These policies will be reviewed further with staff at the Official Plan process stage to obtain input and reflect current studies, programs and priorities. 

 

The Town’s Special Policy Area (SPA) policies are currently reflected as a separate land use designation on Schedule ‘A’ – LAND USE to the Official Plan.  This is the approach adopted by the Town in 1990 with the approval of Official Plan Amendment No. 100.    Most of the Special Policy Areas have now redeveloped and it is appropriate to reflect the existing land use designation on Schedule ‘A’ – LAND USE to the Official Plan together with an SPA overlay.  This is the approach used by most municipalities who have Special Policy Areas within their jurisdiction.  It provides clearer direction to staff and landowners on land use permissions while ensuring the requirements of the Special Policy Area are met.  The land use designation for the SPA lands will reflect the uses contained within the operative Secondary Plans (Unionville Core Area, South Unionville and Markham Centre), applicable Zoning By-laws and existing uses.  There are no changes proposed to the Special Policy Area boundaries (SPA boundaries were revised in 2006 by Official Plan Amendment No. 153) or policies at this time.   The proposed Special Policy Area designations are identified in Figure ‘6’.

 

The Greenbelt Plan provides municipalities with a single, one-time opportunity to adjust the boundaries of Hamlets located within the Greenbelt Plan area to rationalize these relative to the Greenbelt policies.  The affected Hamlets include Locust Hill, Cedar Grove, Almira and Dickson Hill.  In discussion with Development Services Committee, staff were asked to review a potential expansion of the Locust Hill Hamlet eastward as an opportunity to address Rouge Park uses and potential heritage building relocations.  This opportunity has been identified and staff will review this option in the context of the future Official Plan Review process.  Figure ‘2’ – Greenway Components reflects the proposed boundaries for the Hamlets.  All landowners within the existing and proposed Hamlet boundaries were given notice of the Phase 2 public information meeting held on April 29, 2009.  The Hamlet policies are not being reviewed under this process, but are anticipated to be reviewed through the Town’s future comprehensive Official Plan Review process.  

 

Town’s Greenway System Strategy Approach

Municipalities are empowered through Provincial legislation to develop natural heritage system policies and mapping to implement provincial, regional, agency and local policies and programs.  The Greenway System strategy for the Town of Markham was prepared to support a linked and connected system of natural heritage and hydrological features and the lands needed to support the function of these features.  The Greenway System protects the Town’s waterways, woodlands and wetlands, provides for a major east-west ecological corridor connecting natural features and subwatersheds, provides for enhanced biodiversity nodes to protect natural heritage and hydrological features and wildlife habitats and protects agricultural lands in the Greenbelt. 

 

The systems approach to natural heritage planning uses ecological planning principles and is a well recognized planning tool.  Natural Heritage Systems planning is used at all levels of government including local, regional and provincial scale planning, and was also used in the Town’s Natural Features Study undertaken in 1993.   Figure ‘4’ identifies the Regional Context and illustrates the how the natural heritage systems approach extends beyond the municipal boundaries.     

 

The Greenway System and the Components

The Town’s proposed Greenway System includes natural features, water features and additional lands necessary to support the long-term sustainability and function of these features.  Lands within the proposed Greenway System are not available for urban land development, but may support existing residential, rural and agricultural uses.  The system would also include all the lands identified by the Province within the Greenbelt Plan.  The proposed Greenway System is further identified in 3 distinct policy management areas:

·        Natural Heritage Network (NHN)

·        Natural Heritage Network Enhancement (NHNE)

·        Greenbelt Agriculture (GA)

The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan has already been implemented through Official Plan Amendment No. 117 and is recommended to be retained as a separate designation.   No changes in the ORM policies (now approved by the Province) are proposed.  Table 1 identifies the land areas within the Town.

 

Table 1

Land Statistics of the Proposed Greenway System

 

Area (hectares)

Percentage of the Town

Greenway System made up of:

6,830

32%

    Natural Heritage Network

   5,336

    25%

   Greenbelt Agriculture

   1,494

    7%

    Natural Heritage Network

    Enhancement (estimated)

134

.5%

Oak Ridges Moraine

601

3%

Total (Greenway, Enhancement  and ORM)

7,565

35.5%

 

The proposed Greenway System (see Figure ‘1’) was delineated at a Town-wide scale using government and agency data through a desk top and GIS process.  The Greenway System boundaries are subject to confirmation through future detailed site and secondary plan level studies.  The consulting team and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority have confirmed a few sites in the field at the request of the landowners where the mapped features were significant and warranted further review.  As the Town moves forward to implement the proposed Greenway System through the Official Plan, further minor mapping adjustments can be made where warranted and justified.   Vegetative Protection Zones and buffers have not been applied to the features contained in the Natural Heritage Network with the exception of the watercourses within the Rouge watershed which have been delineated using the Rouge Park boundary delineation criteria which includes the buffer areas.  The Vegetative Protective Zone requirements are identified in the draft policies and will reflect the buffer requirements of the Greenbelt Plan and recognized Provincial and Town buffer standards for woodlots, wetlands and non-Rouge tributaries.   

 

Natural Heritage Network (NHN)

The Natural Heritage Network (NHN) is the major component of the Greenway System.   The NHN is shown on Figure ‘2’, Greenway Components Map.  The Natural Heritage Network includes the following components:

         Flood plain lands, watercourse and stream corridors

         Wetlands meeting Provincial or TRCA criteria

         Woodlands meeting Provincial, Regional, TRCA and Town criteria including zoned woodlots 

         Meadows that are contiguous with a valley corridor or other listed feature

         Naturalized stormwater management ponds that are contiguous with a valley corridor or other listed feature

         Habitat for species of special concern, threatened and endangered species and species  ranked by the TRCA as L1 to L3 that is contiguous with a valley corridor or other listed feature

         Environmentally Significant Areas identified by the TRCA

         Locally Significant Areas identified by the Town

         Environmental Protection Areas identified by the Town  

         Rouge North Management Lands delineated in accordance with OPA No. 140

         Greenbelt lands along the Bruce, Berczy, Robinson, Mount Joy and Little Rouge Creeks

 

It is the long-term intent that lands contained within the Natural Heritage Network are to be protected for natural heritage and open space purposes.  However, it is recognized that some of the Natural Heritage Network lands contained in the Rouge North and Greenbelt Plan Area are used for existing residential and agricultural purposes.  These uses will be permitted, and are expected to continue unencumbered, until such time as adjacent land uses change.  In future, as lands adjacent to the Natural Heritage Network maybe approved for development, and continued agriculture in not feasible due to fragmentation, the Natural Heritage Network lands will be conveyed into public ownership, where possible and feasible, and managed as part of the Town’s natural and open space system.  Where it is not possible to acquire lands in public ownership, the lands will be protected for natural heritage purposes in private ownership and existing uses will be permitted to continue.  The Province has supported in principle the Greenbelt Plan area river corridors in the west and north area of the Town, being incorporated into the Natural Heritage Network, supporting the long-term vision for natural heritage lands subject to allowing the continuation of existing agricultural uses.     

 

Figure ‘3’, reflects the feature and policy layers that were used to build the Greenway System.  The features layers were derived from numerous sources and have differing levels of accuracy (e.g. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority data are presented at a jurisdiction scale and relies on field work to confirm boundaries).   Where the Town has been able to refine the natural heritage layers through previous decisions of Council and site visits, the refinements are reflected on the Figure ‘1’ Greenway System and Figure ‘2’ Greenway Components.  Staff have been asked by a number of stakeholders to undertake detailed review as possible corrections to the features mapping.  These features reflect the layers produced by supporting agencies and upper tier governments, and represent the data used to develop the NHN.  Figure ‘3’ does not need to be revised at this time, as it is not intended to form an operative component of the future Official Plan.  The basis for the Greenway System is duly reflected on Figures ‘1’ and ‘2’, and any future refinements or corrections to detailed mapping can be accommodated through the Official Plan Review and potentially also in any future Secondary Plans and development approvals. 

 

Natural Heritage Network – Enhancement Areas

The Natural Heritage Network Enhancement lands are shown conceptually on the Greenway Components Map (see Figure ‘2’).   Enhancement lands are lands that currently do not contain natural heritage or hydrological features, but which have been identified as providing further support to the Greenway System to address the Town’s biodiversity and linkage objectives.  Enhancement core lands are identified in areas adjacent to significant natural features.  The additional lands assist in creating larger natural areas necessary to retain the existing amount and diversity of flora and fauna, if and when lands uses become urbanized in the future.  Enhancement lands were identified by the consulting team using both ecological principles for biodiversity centres, as well as the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy mapping. 

 

The most northerly proposed ecological enhancement corridor area creates a 200 metre wide ecological corridor connecting the Little Rouge Creek to the Berczy Creek.  The location of the proposed corridor builds on an already robust base of existing natural heritage and hydrological features which minimizes the additional enhancement land requirements needed to achieve the corridor.  The ecological corridor connects into Richmond Hill, Whitchurch-Stouffville, Pickering and Toronto (see Figure ‘2’).  The second ecological corridor is proposed to connect the Little Rouge Creek corridor to the Provincially Significant Wetland located between McCowan Road and the Little Rouge Creek.  The study consultants have identified the need for an ecological corridor in this area to ensure the wetland does not become isolated should urban development occur at a future date.  The ecological connection at this location could easily be accommodated at the north end of the wetland providing the shortest distance or further south connecting to the Greenbelt Plan area ‘finger’ located west of Highway 48.  The enhancement connection is shown conceptually at the north end of the woodlot, but it is recognized that this connection will be subject to further review through a future Secondary Plan exercise and Environmental Management Study process.       

 

In Phase 2 of the study process, the Natural Heritage Network incorporated a multi-use activity linkage connecting the Little Rouge Creek to the Bruce Creek.  This connection is proposed to function as a pedestrian, open space corridor which could provide some ecological benefits.  After further review, it was determined that the principle of mid-block multi-use connections is already established in the Town’s urban design guidelines and that this should continue to be supported as a Town-wide urban design principle. 

 

Overall, the NHN provides a comprehensive solution to protecting the Town’s natural features in the long term within an ecologically-based natural heritage system.  It not only protects and connects natural features within the Town, but links them to the larger regional landscape through connections to the Rouge Park, Oak Ridges Moraine and Seaton Natural Heritage System.

 

Greenbelt Agriculture – Greenbelt Conformity

The Provincial Greenbelt Plan was released by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing in February 2005.  The accompanying Greenbelt Protection Act requires that local and regional municipalities implement the Greenbelt Plan within 5 years through their Official Plan review processes.  The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study incorporates the Greenbelt Plan requirements within the Greenway System framework.

The Greenbelt Plan designates all the lands within the Greenbelt Plan area as Protected Countryside, Oak Ridges Moraine and Niagara Escarpment.  In Markham, the lands are further identified as Natural Heritage System except for a cemetery on Steeles Avenue east of Reesor Road, and a property on Highway 7 (Locust Hill).   The Natural Heritage System is a Provincial overlay which supports natural heritage and hydrological features and functions.  The Province intends that the Natural Heritage System be an overlay of the Protected Countryside designation and that agricultural uses permitted by local Official Plans continue to be permitted subject to the constraints of the Natural Heritage System.  The Greenbelt Plan permits both agricultural uses and natural heritage protection and enhancement in the eastern Markham Greenbelt lands, but does not provide direction with respect to where these specific uses should be located.    

 

Because of the significant public ownership of lands in eastern Markham and the need for agricultural certainty to ensure long-term sustainability, the consulting team have recommended an approach to provide more certainty to natural heritage and agricultural lands and ensure Town policies support the Rouge Park Management Plans.  The strategy being recommended includes the delineation of the Natural Heritage Network on the eastern Greenbelt Plan Area lands providing primacy for natural heritage protection and park related uses, but also providing a clear policy context for the continuation of existing long-term agriculture uses within the Natural Heritage Network.  The remainder of the lands in the eastern Greenbelt area are proposed for a Greenbelt Agriculture designation which would identify the primacy of the lands for agricultural purposes, allowing natural heritage restoration as a secondary and complementary use.   This approach recognizes and supports agricultural uses through the entire Greenbelt Plan area, but provides greater certainty for long-term agriculture to continue on the lands identified as Greenbelt Agriculture.  This approach is also consistent with the Town’s current Agricultural designation in the Official Plan.  The policies of the Greenbelt Plan can be fully implemented within this framework. 

 

The Town has had several meetings with Provincial and Rouge Park representatives to discuss an appropriate policy approach for these lands.  The Greenbelt Plan states that minor rounding out of the Natural Heritage System is permitted, but the Province is concerned that the Town’s proposed approach is more extensive than the rounding out contemplated by the Province.  It should be noted that the Town has included all natural heritage and hydrological features, as well as vegetation protection zones captured through the Rouge Park boundary delineation criteria, in the Natural Heritage Network and the remaining lands are identified as agricultural lands.  The Town’s proposed approach simply distinguishes the land uses in a manner which provides for greater certainty and supports the overall intent of the Greenbelt Plan.   Agricultural land uses and natural heritage restoration are distinct uses which although complementary within an area and landscape context, can become conflicting uses at the site level.  The challenge with the approach being recommended by the Province for a Natural Heritage System overlay over the entire Greenbelt Plan area is that, despite the stated goal of protection of agriculture, there is no certainty for agricultural activity over the long term.  Under the policies of the Greenbelt Plan, there is no provision to direct how lands are to be used, as long as the uses are consistent with the Plan.  Consequently, the Town would have no policy context to support the use of ‘prime’ agricultural land for agriculture.  Town staff will continue to work with the Province and Rouge Park to provide a policy framework which provides certainty for natural heritage protection, reforestoration and long-term agricultural uses consistent with the intent of the Greenbelt Plan.   The proposed Greenbelt Agricultural area currently comprises approximately 1,494 hectares, roughly 7% of the total area of the Town. 

 

The Greenbelt Plan allows municipalities to refine their rural and prime agricultural designations.  All of the agricultural lands in Markham are identified as Class 1 and 2 which meets the Provincial Policy Statement classification for Prime lands.   The Region is undertaking a LEAR (Land Evaluation Area Review) classification study as an alternative classification system to further distinguish prime and rural lands at a more specific level.  Although the Regional LEAR has not been completed, preliminary findings indicate that all lands in Markham will be classified as ‘prime’.   The Greenbelt Plan is very restrictive with respect to non-agricultural uses on prime lands and this presents a challenge with respect to the implementation of the Rouge Park.  The Province has confirmed that Section 3.2.6 of the Greenbelt Plan, which acknowledges the Rouge North Management Plan, gives the Town the authority to prepare policies that support Rouge Park uses on prime lands, notwithstanding the classification as ‘prime’.

 

Land Securement

The proposed policy directions and framework identify a number of mechanisms to protect and secure the proposed Natural Heritage Network and Enhancement areas into public ownership.  These include the traditional and new planning tools provided through the Planning Act, using open space intensive uses such as parkland, schools and recreation centres and outright purchase.  The Town has adopted a Land Securement Strategy to be used to guide Council with environmental land purchases through the Markham Environmental Land Securement Fund.  Given the importance of the Natural Heritage Network Enhancement lands to the overall system it would be appropriate to identify these lands as a priority for securement, once the implementing Official Plan Amendment is approved.  The issue of a fair and equitable land securement strategy has been raised numerous times throughout the public consultation events.  The study identifies a number of tools and incentives available through the Planning Act to assist municipalities with protecting and acquiring natural heritage lands.

 

A Land Securement Strategy will be an important component for the implementation of the Greenway System.  The proposed Natural Heritage Network Enhancement lands are intended to be identified as a potential opportunity.  If the funding or necessary incentives are not available to secure the lands for protection as part of Natural Heritage Network, they may be considered for urban uses, if and when, urban expansion is contemplated for the adjacent lands. 

 

Monitoring

The EPRC included a monitoring protocol for the Greenway System for the purpose of gauging the success of the implementation process and to determine future restoration priorities. This monitoring would be based on a Geographic Information System (GIS) technology with the objective of integrating the monitored data with the Town’s Geomatic database.

 

It is proposed that the monitoring information would include the following:

  • Delineation of Baseline Conditions - to a great extent this has been completed through the current mapping exercise which was undertaken as a part of the EPRC process.
  • Review and Update (including aerial photography interpretation) – this would be undertaken whenever new aerial photographs became available to the municipality and would probably occur every two years. Importantly this proposed exercise would provide greater clarity as to the extent of natural cover (percentage) in Markham and any changes that may occur over time.
  • Tracking of Agency and Volunteer-based Restoration Projects – Since the advent of the Town’s Trees for Tomorrow program tracking of trees planted by both the Town and other volunteer-based restoration projects have been undertaken by the Operations Branch of the Town. This information includes the number of trees planted, species composition, location of restoration sites and the name of the agency or volunteer group undertaking the plantings. This information will need to be geo-referenced and added to the GIS database.

 

Matters Requiring Further Review

The endosation of the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation study does not in any way impact the ability of the staff to continue to review the Greenway System mapping and policy approaches as part of completing a new Official Plan where detailed information and comments are brought forward.  However, to provide some certainty to landowners who have identified a significant mapping issue, the specific areas listed below will be reviewed further as new information is brought forward.  These sites are identified on Figure ‘5’.  This list does not preclude the review of other lands where new information is provided. 

  

1.      Natural Heritage/ Agricultural designations on Greenbelt East Lands (Site 1)

The Rouge Park is currently undertaking the Markham East Rouge Park Management Study.  The Town will continue work with the Rouge Park, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Province to delineate natural heritage and agricultural lands in eastern Markham with an effort to align the boundaries to the extent possible and ensure greater clarity and certainty for all stakeholders as the Rouge Park plans are implemented.  

 

2.      Romandale Farms (Site 2)
The Romandale Farms property is located on Elgin Mills Road east of Warden Avenue and has been identified as a Regionally Significant Woodlands within the Region’s Significant Woodlands database.  Staff have met with the applicant and Toronto Region Conservation Authority on site and have supported and encouraged a review the Regional classification in advance of or concurrent with the Official Plan Review process.  Should the classification on the lands change, the mapping will be adjusted to reflect the revised delineation prior to the mapping being incorporated into the Regional Official Plan.   


 

3.      Remington  Lands (Site 3)

The Remington lands located at Ninth Line and Steeles Avenue (Remington Parkview Golf Course) have been further reviewed relative to the enhancement lands designation and TRCA woodlands layer.  The proposed Natural Heritage Network Enhancement symbol has been applied to a parcel currently used for the golf course and containing existing trees immediately north of the Rouge Park lands bounded by the rail line and Rouge River.  The site does not currently have road frontage.  The owner has requested that the enhancement layer be removed.  Because of the development constraints on the land and the connection to the Rouge Park lands, staff recommend that the land continue to be identified as Natural Heritage Network Enhancement lands.  The enhancement symbol is intended to evolve into either the Natural Heritage Network designation or an urban development designation once further detailed review is undertaken in the context of a Secondary Plan exercise and Environmental Management Study or development application and land securement options are explored.  Given the site constraints for development, it would be premature to remove the symbol at this time.   

 

The Remington lands also contain a Toronto and Region Conservation Authority woodlands layer on the golf course lands adjacent to the Ninth Line.  A portion of this woodland is located beneath the hydro corridor.  The woodlot feature is existing, but the health and sustainability of the feature may require further review to ascertain the appropriateness of long term protection.  The boundary of the Natural Heritage Network is subject to confirmation through a Environmental Management Study.  This feature can be assessed in more detail at the development stage.

 

4.      Angus Glen (Site 4)

The Natural Heritage Network encompasses lands identified as Regionally Significant Woodlands and a TRCA woodlands layer located north of the Angus Glen Community Centre.  The lands are wooded, but are primarily used for a tree plantation.   The boundary of the Natural Heritage Network is subject to confirmation through Environmental Management Study.  This feature can be assessed in more detail at the development stage.

 

5.      North Markham Landowners Group

The North Markham Landowners Group (NMLG) represent a landowners group in north Markham comprising 860 hectares of land.  The NMLG have participated in the Town’s process and have submitted a detailed letter addressing policy and technical issues.   Some of the issues raised have been addressed in this report (land securement, Angus Glen lands and enhancement corridors).  Many of the other comments raised are issues related to policy wording and will be fully considered and addressed in the next stage of this process when the preparation of a new Official Plan commences.  The Policies, Directions and Framework contained in the study report are policy directions intended to provide guidance and discussion.  The specific wording of the policies will be subject to further refinement and public comment and the comments received will be considered in the first draft of the Official Plan at the appropriate time.   Some of the policy directions are specific requirements in the Greenbelt Plan and cannot be altered (e.g. 30 metre vegetation protection zone requirement for features within the Greenbelt Plan area).   

         

Next Steps – Growth Management Strategy and New Official Plan Update

The EPRC Study provides a framework for a Town-wide Greenway System and a policy framework for implementation within the Growth Management Strategy and the Town’s Official Plan.  The study mapping and draft policy framework will replace the Town’s current environmental and natural heritage policies, consolidate the existing Oak Ridges Moraine, Special Policy Area and Rouge Park policies and introduce the Greenbelt conformity mapping and policies. 

 

The Greenbelt Act provides that municipalities must bring their official plans into conformity with the Greenbelt Plan within the context of Planning Act mandated five year official plan review.  Once the Town has completed and endorsed the Growth Management Strategy which includes the Greenway System, an Official Plan Review will be initiated.  The proposed Greenway System and associated policy directions and framework will provide the basis for new natural heritage polices in the new Official Plan.

 

Staff heard throughout the study process that notwithstanding using multiple means of study process notification (e-mails, website, newspaper notification), many landowners, predominantly in the rural area, felt the information was not being communicated to all Markham residents.  In order to address this issue, staff recommend that an enhanced communication program be considered at the initiation for the Official Plan Amendment process in consultation with the Town communications Department to ensure a wider circulation of information.   This could comprise an individual mailing or communication at the commencement of the Official Plan Review process.

 

Staff will continue to work with stakeholders to address specific issues related to existing natural heritage and hydrological features.   Where landowners request site visits to confirm natural heritage or hydrologic features be undertaken, in advance of the specific study requirements outlined in the draft policy framework, the cost of any necessary participation of the Town’s consultants for this level of detailed site specific review will be the responsibility of the landowner.   

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND TEMPLATE: (external link)

There are no direct financial implications as a result of this report. 

 

HUMAN RESOURCES CONSIDERATIONS

Not applicable.

 

ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

The proposed study is consistent with the Building Markham’s Future Together strategic priorities on the Environment and Growth Management and the Town’s goals for natural heritage protection. 


BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The EPRC study has consulted widely with external agencies and stakeholders, as well as staff in the Development, Corporate and Community Services Commissions.  Comments provided by internal staff regarding policy wording will be incorporated into the future draft official plan policies.    

 

CONCLUSION:

The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study reflects the direction provided by the Province for natural heritage planning through the Provincial Policy Statement, Growth Plan and Greenbelt Plan, reflects the current policies adopted by the Town and incorporates the requirements of the Region and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.  The study also reflects Markham’s priorities for natural heritage protection as identified through “Building Markham’s Future Together” and supports the recommendations of the Rouge, Don and Duffins watershed plans.   The Greenway system reflects an innovative, ambitious and scientifically defendable approach and one which provides greater assurance of protecting the Town’s natural resources from the impacts of future urbanization.    

 

The full Environmental Policy Review and Consolation Study Final Report will be available by electronic link and will be posted on the Town’s website.  The Executive Summary is included as Appendix ‘A’.

 

RECOMMENDED  BY:

 

 

 

________________________                              ________________________

Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P, R.P.P.                     Jim Baird, M.C.I.P, R.P.P

Director of Planning and Urban Design                    Commissioner of Development Services

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Figure 1:                     Greenway System

Figure 2:                     Greenway Components

Figure 3:                     Natural Heritage and Hydrological Features and Policy Layers

Figure 4:                     Regional Context

Figure 5:                     Matters Requiring Further Review

Figure 6:                     Proposed Land Use Designations for the Special Policy Area

                                 

Appendix ‘A’             EPRC Study Executive Summary           

Appendix ‘B’             Public Response Summary

Appendix ‘C’             Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study Final Report             (electronic link to agenda)

Q:\Development\Planning\MISC\MI494 EPRC Study (Natural Heritage\Reports\DSC Report June 2009.doc