Report to: General Committee Report
Date:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
1) THAT the report titled “East Markham Community Centre & Library – Design Development” be received; and,
2) THAT the presentation by Shore Tilbe Irwin & Partners highlighting the result of the Design Development phase of the project be received; and,
3) THAT Council authorizes staff to proceed with the detailed design drawings, technical specifications and contract documents phase of the project; and,
4) THAT Council directs
staff to report back in September 2009 with an update of project cost; and,
5) FURTHER THAT staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
The purpose of this
report is to seek Council’s authorization to proceed with the preparation of detailed
design drawings, technical specifications and contract document for the East
Markham Community Centre & Library (EMCC&L) and the associated parking
garage structure. The intent is to
complete this phase of the project by the end of this year.
Staff, together with Shore Tilbe Irwin and
Partners (STIP), presented a schematic design to Council at their Development
Services Committee meeting on
STIP were directed to explore alternatives
at that meeting. A revised schematic
design was presented to, and adopted by, General Committee at their meeting on
Since the beginning of this year, STIP had conducted numerous micro-planning sessions with various internal staff stakeholders, Markham Stouffville Hospital (MSH) expansion project team members, as well as staff from Markham District Energy Inc. (MDEI). The purpose of these meetings is to solicit more detailed design requirements for the Design Development phase of the project.
OPTIONS/ DISCUSSION:
The numerous micro-planning sessions with staff and other stakeholders during the Design Development phase resulted in valuable comments and suggestions. The present floor layouts reflect the incorporation of a significant number of the suggestions.
STIP presented various options of exterior material palettes/packages to the Council Sub-committee in February, 2009. The Sub-committee adopted one of the options and had visited an existing building in April, 2009 where the selected brick was used.
Please refer to STIP’s presentation for the floor layouts and the Council sub-committee adopted exterior material palette (Attachment A).
A construction cost estimate was performed in mid-May, 2009 by STIP’s cost sub-consultant at the conclusion of the Design Development phase of the project. The estimate included the cost associated with the various suggestions derived from the micro-planning sessions, which STIP incorporated into the Design Development layouts.
Staff Report dated
“Due to the size and
complexity of this project, an external Project Management Consultant will also
be retained to provide additional project management services, primarily during
the construction phase of the project.
This consultant will assist with the assembly and issuance of the
construction tender document, and pre-qualification and screening of potential
contractors. In addition, the consultant
will provide on-site activities management during the construction phase of the
project, including schedule and cost control as well as change order
management.”
Council authorized staff to proceed with the strategy. Staff is presently in the process of issuing an RFP for the external consultant. Staff will report back on the recommended award.
COST
ESTIMATE:
The inclusion of various suggestions presented at the micro-planning staff stakeholder meetings results in the increase in programming floor area and associated construction cost. STIP’s cost consultant estimated the all-inclusive construction cost to be $54.999 m. This represents $1.9 m more than what staff had previously projected and reported to Council ($53.1 m).
Staff reviewed the cost
consultant’s report and directed STIP to effect reduction measures to bring the
construction cost within the $53.1 m target.
STIP proposed a “Value Engineering List” which was discussed and debated
at length at the mid-May, 2009 Council Sub-Committee meeting. Members of the Council Sub-Committee embraced
STIP’s initial recommendations which resulted in a saving of $1.07 m. See
Attachment B for the breakdown of these items.
STIP was further directed by staff to propose additional cost reduction measures. See attachment C for the additional proposed items. If adopted, the estimated construction cost will achieve the original $53.1 m target. The primary cost reducing items include:
· Deletion of stakeholder’s request for a dedicated swim officials room
· Simplification of and adjustments to parking garage cladding system
· Revisions to library structure at 2nd floor and roof
· Modification to lobby skylight and supporting structure
· Revisions to skylights at gym and pool
During the next few months while developing the detailed design drawings and the technical specifications, staff and STIP will review with the Council Sub-Committee the additional cost reduction measures and undertake a more detailed costing and report back to Council in September regarding the projected construction cost.
The estimated internal cost will be increased by $300,000 to account for additional project management cost for the external consultant, as described earlier in the “Discussion” section of this report. The amount is offset through reduced land cost as a result of updated information.
The estimated cost for furniture, equipment and IT remains at $7.4m.
Town of |
||||||||
EMCC&L Cost Analysis Comparison |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST ESTIMATE |
General Committee Presentation |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
$6,300,000 |
|
|
$4,600,000 |
|
|
|
$4,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction (including parking
structure and construction contingency) |
$51,400,000 |
|
|
$53,100,000 |
Note 1 |
|
|
$53,100,000 |
Note 1:
Includes reallocated land cost of $1.7 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to parking structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal cost at 10% of
Construction Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STIP
(Architectural/Engineering Consulting Services) |
$2,127,600 |
|
|
$2,127,600 |
|
|
|
$2,127,600 |
STIP
(project scope changes, including parking structure) |
|
|
|
$591,480 |
|
|
|
$591,480 |
Other
internal costs (including internal and external |
$3,172,400 |
|
|
2,580,920 |
|
|
|
2,880,920 |
Project and Construction
Management cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FF&E / IT cost |
$7,400,000 |
|
|
$7,400,000 |
|
|
|
$7,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost Estimate |
$70,400,000 |
|
|
$70,400,000 |
|
|
|
$70,400,000 |
BUDGET
STATUS:
Total approved funding for the East Markham
Community Centre project is $70.4 million.
PROPOSED
FUNDING SOURCES:
Historically, Recreation/Library facilities excluding Recreation IT costs have been funded from 90% Development Charges and 10% non-growth source. It is anticipated that this approach will be used for this project as well as a contribution from MSH for costs related to hospital initiatives and possible Gas Tax funding.
A refined cost estimate with corresponding funding sources will be provided to Council prior to construction tendering.
The East Markham Community Centre and Library will incorporate an environmentally friendly building design, energy consumption and product procurement in the development of the facility. It is targeted to achieve at least the Council-mandated LEED Silver certification level, with an aim to achieve the next higher level of certification, i.e. LEED Gold, if practicable.
The facility will be designed in accordance with all requirements of the Ontario Building Code as well as the current (2007) Accessibilities Guidelines of the Town.
The project
aligns with the following Town of
Recreation Services
Planning & Urban Design
Financial Services
Real Property
Strategic Initiatives
RECOMMENDED
__________________ _____________________ _____________________
Glen
Taylor Catherine
Biss
Acting Director, Chief Executive Officer Director,
Recreation
Services
________________________
Brenda Librecz
Commissioner
Community and Fire Services
Attachment A:
Attachment B: Initial Value Engineering List
Attachment C: Revised Value Engineering List
Q:\commission
Attachment B
Attachment C