Report to: Development Services Committee Date:
March 2, 2010
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY: Lilli Duoba, Senior Project Coordinator
Environmental
RECOMMENDATION:
1) That the staff report entitled “
2) And that the report be forwarded to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Region of York for information;
3) And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Provincial Greenbelt Plan, created under the Greenbelt
Act, provides permanent protection for natural heritage and agricultural lands
in southern
Any Town initiated process seeking to expand the
A
It is the opinion of staff, in consultation with the
Province and the Region, that a decision on the Town’s preferred growth
alternative needs to be made in order to inform any
On
The Greenbelt Act, enacted by the Province in 2004 and followed by the release of the Greenbelt Plan in early 2005, identifies 1.8 million acres of environmentally sensitive and agricultural lands in the Greater Golden Horseshoe for protection from urbanization. Within the Region of York, the Greenbelt Plan and Oak Ridges Moraine Plan comprise 69% of the Regional municipality. The Province will be undertaking a mandatory review of the Greenbelt Plan in 2015.
In
The framework and draft
Council Direction and Context
As directed by Council, in
December 2009 Town staff met with representatives of the Ministry of Municipal
Affairs and Housing and the Region of York to discuss requirements and issues
related to possible expansion of the
Growing the Greenbelt Principles
and Criteria
The Province released the final ‘Growing the Greenbelt’ criteria in August 2008. The document was prepared to assist municipalities who have an interest in exploring local opportunities to grow the Greenbelt. To date, there have been no formal requests made by single tier or upper tier Regional municipalities as required by the Growing the Greenbelt initiative, to grow the Greenbelt.
The criteria and the process to consider requests to grow
the
The Ministry has identified six criteria outlined below, which must be met, to the Minister’s satisfaction before a request will be considered (see Appendix ‘A’). The following requirements would apply to any request initiated by Markham:
1. Municipal
Request. The formal request to ‘Grow
the Greenbelt’ must be from the Region of York supported by a Markham Council
resolution.
2. Additions
to the
3. Embraces
the
4. Connections
to
5. Complements
the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The proposed area for Greenbelt expansion
cannot impede the implementation of the Growth Plan.
6. Timing
and Relationship to Other Provincial Initiatives. The Town must demonstrate that the proposed
Technical Review and Public Consultation
Required in advance of any Formal Request to Region
The
This would require the Regional
staff to work with the Town throughout the review and consultation processes to
ensure that the Region’s requirements are met.
Once the Town has completed the review and consultation process and
prepared the necessary supporting documentation addressing all the Provincial
criteria, Markham Council would pass a resolution requesting the Region to pursue
a
What Lands Could Be Considered?
Lands that might be considered
in
A.
Rural Greenway
Lands outside of the current Greenbelt boundary,
outside of the current settlement boundary
B.
Urban Greenway
Lands inside the current settlement boundary
C.
Agricultural
Lands not required for Growth outside of
the current Greenbelt boundary, as determined through the Town’s endorsed
Growth Management Strategy and approved Official Plan
Town’s Proposed Greenway System
In November 2009, Council endorsed
a proposed Greenway System for the Town.
The Greenway System identifies lands that should not be available for
development. The identified Greenway
System includes all the lands in
Table 1 breaks down the
composition of the Town’s Greenway System by area. Table 2 identifies the number of properties which
would be affected by a potential
Considerations
for Option ‘A’ – Rural Greenway Lands (Figure 2).
Within the Town’s rural area,
the proposed Greenway System accounts for approximately 5,748 hectares of which
approximately 5191 hectares are already subject to the Greenbelt Plan. There are approximately 403 properties wholly
or partially inside the proposed Greenway System.
The lands comprising the rural portion
of the Greenway System outside of the
The rural Greenway lands generally
meet the Provincial criteria for connectivity to the existing Greenbelt. However, there is some question as to whether
these lands can be substantiated under the criteria requiring a ‘Provincial
scale’ system, and requires further technical review. Further review is also necessary to determine
if current uses on these lands would preclude consideration for Greenbelt
purposes (ie. golf courses, etc.).
Considerations for Option ‘B’ – Urban Greenway System
(Figure 3 and 4)
The Urban Greenway System is approximately
1,725 hectares and includes both public and private lands. The private lands are scattered throughout
the system with a significant amount in the Thornhill community, golf courses
and older urban areas of Markham. There are approximately 3,445 properties
wholly or partially inside the urban Greenway System. Figure
‘4’ identifies the private land ownership in the Greenway System of the urban
area.
The Greenbelt Plan is not
intended to address urban conditions and applying the Greenbelt Plan policies
into an urban context will present challenges.
However, Provincial staff indicated that they would not preclude
consideration of an expansion proposal in the urban area. The challenge of the Greenbelt Plan in the
urban area is the application of the performance standards and buffers is
likely not implementable given the already defined edges of the features
adjacent to development lands and the lack of undeveloped lands to accommodate
additional buffering. In addition, there
are uses already located on some of these lands that would not be consistent
with the policies in the Greenbelt Plan, including active parkland and
municipal infrastructure such as stormwater management facilities. Finally, the
need for a Greenbelt designation on these lands may not be justified given
their current protected status both by existing policy, and in many cases public
ownership.
Considerations for Option C – Agricultural Lands not
Required for Growth as per the staff Preferred Growth Management Option (Figure
5).
The staff preferred growth
alternative identifies approximately 900 hectares or 4% of the total area of
the Town for proposed new community lands to 2031. The total whitebelt lands comprise approximately
2,676 hectares (13% of the Town) which leaves approximately 1,776 hectares (9% of the Town)
remaining as agricultural lands outside the Greenway System, not required to
accommodate growth in the 2031 planning horizon.
Should Council wish to pursue
the expansion of the
The Province has identified that
they will not consider any changes to the policies contained within the
Greenbelt Plan. Any potential landowner expansions
would be subject to the restrictive policy regime of the Greenbelt Plan. Within the agricultural area, a
The Town’s agricultural area
including components of the Greenway System lands includes approximately 567
properties. A public consultation
program will also need to be developed to address and respond to potential
concerns raised by landowners and other stakeholders.
Public Consultation
The Province requires that the municipalities wishing to grow the
Greenbelt undertake a consultation program with landowners, agencies, public
and aboriginal communities. In terms of
consultation with the aboriginal communities, the Province has suggested that
consultation programs similar in scale to the consultations undertaken for the
Regional Official Plan be used, which includes consultation with the First
Nation and Metis communities.
The Town should also plan for enhanced consultations and communications
with landowners, since all
Should Council wish to proceed with this process, staff will report back
on an appropriate consultation process and budget (based on the option
pursued).
Work Plan Framework for a Potential
Council direction to pursue an
expansion of the
·
Determine appropriate
land option (Rural Greenway, Urban Greenway, Agriculture or combination) for study
and consultation (Council Direction)
·
Prepare budget to address
technical consulting services to prepare justification report, rationalization
and mapping, landowner facilitation and consultation program, aboriginal consultation
program, notifications and communications budget and staff resource
requirements
·
Undertake study
process including consultation program
·
Identify technical
advisory group comprising regional, TRCA and provincial staff and Consultation
Committee with Members of Council.
It is estimated that the overall
review and consultation could become a multi-year process and would require
potentially significant funding for technical review, facilitation, consultation
and related matters.
Staffing
Resources needed to support Greenbelt expansion process
‘Growing the
The option of requesting expansion of the
The following broad considerations should be examined in
advance of considering any
· Council must determine if additional Provincial control is warranted. Do the benefits of the Provincial Greenbelt Plan outweigh the controls that the Town has at its disposal to protect natural heritage and agricultural lands including the Provincial Policy Statement, Official Plan policies, TRCA regulations, zoning, conservation easements, public ownership and other municipal by-laws?
· Council must consider if giving up their decision-making authority to approve planning policy and changes in land use is in the public interest. Under the Provincial Greenbelt Plan, Council would no longer have the ability to approve amendments and/or rezonings for changes in land uses (places of worship, cemeteries, day camps, recreational facilities and other non agricultural uses which tend to locate in rural areas) or even minor boundary changes.
· Council must consider how best to manage extreme positive and negative reactions from environmental groups, landowners, ratepayers and the media. This initiative would generate significant public interest, and require considerable facilitation and consultation.
· Given the five year time frame for the mandated 2015 Provincial Greenbelt review, Council should consider the timing of a Town Greenbelt expansion review relative to completion of the Town’s Growth Management Study, Sustainability Plan and new Official Plan.
It is the opinion of staff, in consultation with the
Province and the Region, that a decision on the Town’s preferred growth
alternative first needs to be made by Council in order to inform any
In the absence of an approved Growth Management Strategy and
new Town Official Plan framework it is felt to be premature to initiate a
review of
However, should Council wish to pursue this process the following actions are necessary:
1. Identify which lands in the Town (Options A, B or C identified in this report, or other alternative) should be identified for further study.
2. Direct staff to bring back a further report identifying study budget, Terms of Reference for consulting services, public and aboriginal consultation process and budget, communications process and staff resource requirements
3. Advise the Province and Region of the Town’s
This report is not recommending a
This report is not recommending a
Strategic considerations relate to the Environment and Growth Management.
This report has been
reviewed by the Legal Department.
RECOMMENDED BY:
_______________________________ ________________________________
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P, R.P.P. Jim Baird, M.C.I.P, R.P.P
Director of
Figure ‘1’ Greenway and Greenbelt Boundaries in Markham
Figure ‘2’ Rural Greenway Lands
Figure ‘3’ Urban Greenway Lands
Figure ‘4’ Urban Greenway Lands – Private Ownership
Figure ‘5’ Agricultural
Lands not required for growth as determined through the Town’s endorsed Growth Management
Strategy.
Appendix ‘A’ Provincial
Growing the Greenbelt Criteria
Appendix ‘B’ Data
Tables
Filepath: Q:\Development\Planning\MISC\MI501 Provincial Greenbelt Plan\Growing the Greenbelt\DSC Information Report February 2010.doc