
Report
to: Development Services Committee Report Date:
March 23, 2010
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION
REPORT
Great Eldin Investments Ltd.
North of Edward Jeffreys
Avenue, west of Highway 48
Wismer Commons Community
Implementing
Zoning By-law amendments for Phase 2 of draft plan of subdivision 19TM-95081
File
Numbers ZA 08-106617 and SU 02-111460 002
PREPARED BY: Teema
Kanji, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
1)
That the report
entitled “Recommendation Report, Great Eldin
Investments Ltd. North of Edward Jeffreys Avenue,
west of Highway 48, Wismer Commons Community. Implementing Zoning By-law amendments for
Phase 2 of draft plan of subdivision 19TM-95081. File Numbers ZA 08-106617 and SU 02-111460
002” be received;
2)
That the
application ZA 08-106617 for amendments to Zoning By-laws 304-87, as amended
and 177-96, as amended, be approved;
3)
That the draft
amendments to Zoning By-laws 304-87 and 177-96, as amended, attached to this
report (Appendix ‘A’) be finalized and enacted without further notice;
4)
That conditional
2011 servicing allocation for 116 units (333 population) be granted to plan of
subdivision 19TM-95081 (Phase 2), from the total allocation for the Wismer Community, assigned in accordance with the February
12, 2008 report on servicing allocation;
5)
And that Staff be
authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this
resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Not
applicable.
The purpose of this report is to
provide background information regarding applications for draft plan of
subdivision approval and implementing zoning by-law amendments within the Wismer Commons Community, and to recommend that the
implementing zoning by-laws be enacted, and that conditional 2011 servicing
allocation be granted.
The subject lands (Phase 2) consist
of 3.99 ha (9.88 acres) located north of Edward Jeffreys Avenue, west of Highway
48 within the Wismer Commons community. The current plan is the final phase of a
larger draft plan of subdivision that has already been draft approved and zoned
(March 2007) and registered. Phase 1 consisted of 63 single detached lots and 8
single detached part lots (total 67 units) and a commercial block.
On January 16, 2007 a Public Meeting
was held to consider the proposed draft plan and implementing zoning by-laws
for the entire residential plan of subdivision (Phases 1 and 2). At the time, the applicant was proposing the
Phase 2 lands to be developed with 46 single detached units, 29 semi-detached
units and several part lots for a total of 121 units. The draft plan also included a 0.95 woodlot
block (Block 71) which would provide access to the adjacent woodlot to the
north and park/school to the west (Figure 2).
There were no concerns expressed by area residents or landowners at the
Public Meeting and no written submissions were received on these applications.
Draft Plan of Subdivision has been revised
The applicant has revised the draft
plan of subdivision and is now proposing to develop the lands with 78
semi-detached units and 16 single detached units. An additional 22 part lots will be combined
with part lots to the north and south to complete an additional 8 semi-detached
units and 14 single detached units, for an overall total of 116 units. Staff is agreeable to allowing this change in
unit mix given that Phase 1 lands to the east (Figure 2) consisted only of single
detached units. The additional
semi-detached units proposed will provide for a better housing mix.
There are 116 units (333 population) of conditional 2011 servicing allocation
available for this plan. The applicant is in the process of executing
an Indemnity Agreement with the Region of York.
OPTIONS/
DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends finalization and enactment of the by-laws
Staff have completed their review and
evaluation of the applications, and the proposal is considered acceptable to
staff. In accordance with the Public
Meeting resolution, the draft implementing zoning by-law amendments (Appendix
‘A’) may now be finalized for enactment. The amendment to By-law 177-96, as amended
includes a Hold provision (H) related to servicing allocation (2011). The conditions that need to be satisfied
prior to the removal of the Hold provision (H) are based on Regional servicing
allocation criteria.
Draft plan approval will be issued by
the Director of Planning & Urban Design or designate in accordance with
Delegation By-law 2002-202, as amended.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The proposed application aligns with
the Town’s strategic priorities of Growth Management and Municipal Services by
implementing the proposed development in coordination with available servicing
allocation.
The applications have been reviewed
by various Town departments and external agencies. Requirements of the Town and external
agencies will be reflected in the conditions of draft plan of subdivision
approval and the implementing zoning by-law amendments.
RECOMMENDED
BY:
____________________________ ____________________________
Biju Karumanchery, M.C.I.P,
R.P.P Jim Baird, M.C.I.P, R.P.P
Senior Development Manager Commissioner, Development Services
Figure 1 – Location Map
Figure 2 – Proposed Plan of Subdivision
Appendix ‘A’ - Draft amendment to By-law 304-87, as
amended
- Draft amendments to By-law
177-96, as amended
APPLICANT/AGENT:
Flato
Management Inc. Tel:
(905) 479-9292
c/o Shakir Rehmatullah Fax:
(905) 479-9165
3601 Highway
7 East
Markham, ON
L3R 0M3
FILE PATH: Amanda\File SU 02 111460 002\Documents\Recommendation Report