Report to: Development Services Committee                                  Report Date: April 20, 2010

 

 

SUBJECT:                          PRELIMINARY REPORT

                                            Town-initiated Sign By-law Amendment to Address Heritage Concerns

PREPARED BY:               Peter Wokral, Heritage Planner ext. 7955

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

1)                  That the report entitled “Town-initiated Sign By-Law Amendment to Address Heritage Concerns” be received;

2)                  That a Public Meeting be held to consider a Town-initiated By-law amendment to the Sign By-law regarding roof signs and signage located on properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

1. Purpose                     2. Background                      3. Discussion                        4. Financial        

 

5. Others (HR, Strategic, Affected Units)                                   6. Attachment(s)

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide information regarding a Town-initiated amendment to the Sign By-law to address heritage concerns, and to recommend that Committee authorize the scheduling of a Public Meeting.

 

BACKGROUND:

The Sign By-law was enacted in 2002

The Town’s Sign By-law (2002-94) was enacted in 2002 and regulates the size, placement, lighting, materials and types of signs in the Town.  Section 10.0 (Special Sign Districts) of the Sign By-law regulates the types of signs that can be erected in the Town’s three heritage conservation districts, and the Buttonville heritage study area.  The provisions of Section 10.0 encourage signs that are complementary to the unique heritage character of these areas.  However, these provisions do not apply to heritage properties in commercial use outside of the Special Sign Districts.

 

The Town’s Sign By-law specifically prohibits Roof Signs

Along with several other forms of signage, roof signs are specifically prohibited in all areas of the Town by the Sign By-law.  The Sign By-law defines a roof sign as any sign that is supported entirely or partly by the roof of a building or structure, and which the sign projects above the roof and parapet.  However, the use of roof signs may be appropriate in some limited heritage situations, as they are a form of signage that was historically used in the Township of Markham.   Most commonly, roof signs were found on veranda roofs of buildings in commercial use, and sometimes on the ridges or parapets of a commercial building’s main roof.  (See Figure 1 for examples of historic Markham roof signs)

 

 

 

 

OPTIONS/ DISCUSSION:

Roof Signs should be permitted in certain heritage circumstances

In an effort to enhance and preserve the heritage character of the Town’s heritage conservation districts and study areas, the provisions of Section 10.0 (Special Sign Districts) are more restrictive in terms of the types, size, illumination, materials, and location of signs.  For some building owners, these provisions can be limiting in their ability to erect effective signage.  In the case of the heritage building located at 2977 16th Avenue, the prohibition of roof signage has resulted in a sign that meets the provisions of Section 10.0 but is both unsatisfactory functionally and inappropriate from a heritage perspective because it blocks significant views to the front door. (See Figure 2)

 

Roof signs could be permitted in cases where there is archival photographic evidence of a building once having roof signs, and in cases where the opportunities for other forms of signage, such as wall signs is limited by the architecture of the building.  The size and placement of roof signs could be based on the provisions contained in Section 10.0 (Special Sign Districts) regarding wall signs.  Figure 3 illustrates an appropriate roof sign for the heritage building located at 2977 16th Avenue based on the provisions for wall signs. 

 

As well as increasing the signage opportunities for heritage properties, permitting roof signs would also improve the authenticity of the Town’s commercial heritage properties.  By only permitting roof signs through Section 10.0 of the Sign By-law, roof signs could only be used in a heritage context and they would still be prohibited on all other properties in the Town.  The support for using roof signs would be contingent upon the sign’s compatibility with the building and the heritage context.

 

Special Sign Districts policies should be extended to individually designated properties

The provisions of Section 10.0 (Special Sign Districts) only apply to properties within the Town’s three heritage conservation districts and the Buttonville heritage study area.  For commercial heritage properties located outside of these areas, the regular policies of the Sign By-law apply.  Having different provisions for the signage associated with individual heritage properties and properties located in the Town’s heritage districts is inconsistent, and can lead to signage that detracts from the heritage character of the building.  For example, backlit, internally illuminated signage is permitted on designated properties outside of heritage districts.  Several property owners have voluntarily adopted the provisions of Section 10.0 for individually designated heritage properties, but these provisions are not mandatory.   Amending the Town’s Sign By-law so that Section 10.0 would also apply to individual heritage properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act is recommended.  This would help ensure that the character of individually designated buildings will be protected as it relates to signage. 

 

By amending Section 10.0 to permit roof signs in certain circumstances, roof signs would also become an option for some individually designated heritage properties located outside of the Town’s heritage districts and study areas.

 

Heritage Markham supports the proposed amendments to the Sign By-law

At their January 13th meeting, Heritage Markham supported the proposed amendments to the Sign By-law recommended by Heritage Section Staff (See Appendix ‘A’)

 

A Public Meeting is required

To amend the Sign By-law, the Town must hold a public meeting.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND TEMPLATE: (external link)

“Not Applicable”

 

HUMAN RESOURCES CONSIDERATIONS

“Not Applicable”

 

ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

Heritage conservation and the integration of heritage resources into new development is part of the Town’s Growth management Plan.  Improving the authenticity and quality of signage associated with heritage buildings and structures strengthens and enriches Town heritage initiatives.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The Zoning Section has provided input into the proposed By-law amendment and has reviewed this report.

 

RECOMMENDED BY:

 

 

 

________________________________            ________________________________

Valerie Shuttleworth, MCIP, RPP                        Jim Baird, MCIP, RPP

Director of Planning & Urban Design       Commissioner of Development Services

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:

 

Figure 1                                    Archival Photographs of Roof Signs in Markham Township

Figure 2                                    Photograph of 2977 16th Avenue

Figure 3                                    Illustration of an appropriate Roof Sign.

Appendix ‘A’                           January 13, 2010 Heritage Markham Extract