M I N U T E S
SHOPS
ON STEELES WORKING GROUP
2010-04-12
Attendance
Members of Thornhill Sub-Committee: Councillor E. Shapero Deputy Mayor J. Heath Mayor F. Scarpitti Regional Councillor J. Jones Councillor Regrets Councillor V. Burke Staff: V. Shuttleworth, Director of R. Blake, Manager Development West B. Lee, Manager, Development Engineering T. Ku, Senior Transportation Engineer J. Kee, Committee Clerk MMM Group Limited Alan Mihalj Satbinder Dnesy |
Applicant
& Design Team James
Koutsovitis, Gatzios J. Mecklinger, Bayview Summit City of City of Pascoal
D’Souza, City of Residents Gary Kay Nafiseh Pourhassani Marsha Winton Bob James Eileen Liasi David Slotnick Brian Compson Patricia Hough Karen Cilevitz, Advisor D. James, Observer |
The Shops on Steeles Working Group meeting
convened at
1. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS
The Chair
welcomed everyone to the meeting and introductions were made around the table.
2. MINUTES
FROM MEETING OF
It was
noted that on Page 3, paragraph 3 should read: “Mr. James requested that the
residents’ submission ….” rather than “his submission”.
Moved by Bob
James
Seconded by Brian Compson
That the
minutes of the Shops on Steeles Working Group meeting held on February 25, 2010,
be adopted, as amended.
CARRIED
3. COMMENTS
FROM TOWN OF
Mr. B. Lee, Manager, Development Engineering, noted that some concerns have been raised regarding the proposed development’s potential impact on traffic and advised that MMM Group Limited was engaged to conduct a Traffic Impact Study and representatives were in attendance this date to provide an overview of the Study undertaken. Mr. Lee noted that some issues remain outstanding and require further discussion.
4. TRAFFIC
STUDY PRESENTATION – MMM GROUP LIMITED
Mr. Alan
Mihalj, Consultant, MMM Group Limited, distributed copies of the results of the
traffic analysis taken on
5. OPEN
DISCUSSION AND QUESTIONS
The
following matters were raised and discussed:
·
Traffic study only examined traffic on Friday and Saturday. Applicant agreed to revise the traffic study
to include mid-week traffic data
·
volumes in A.M. and P.M. peak hours are comparable
·
additional traffic counts will be undertaken;
·
work is intensive and requires large number of staff for one day;
·
concern expressed regarding current bottlenecks at Steeles and Highway
404, and Steeles and Leslie Street; suggestion that traffic counts be conducted
at these intersections; however applicant’s engineer indicated that traffic
impacts at Leslie and Steeles will be limited from this development due to
traffic dispersal
·
rationale for intersections chosen for traffic counts/scope of traffic
study queried
·
concern expressed that
·
concerns expressed about traffic infiltration into surrounding
neighbourhoods
·
license plate surveys have been done; some traffic cutting through
current development
·
discussion of service level categories and how they are determined;
definitions are related to “seconds of delay” - **The Consultant was requested
to email service level category definitions to all Members of Working Group**
·
quadrant is constrained due to restrictions of railway tracks and Highway
404; difficult for some residents wishing to travel east; they must go to
·
suggestion to include signalized intersection of Cliffwood Road and Don
Mills Road in study; Consultant advised that traffic studies are typically
conducted on major arterial intersections;
·
some traffic deviates via
·
clarification requested regarding the inclusion of buses in the traffic
count; buses are included, however, it was noted that some buses may be
included under “trucks”
·
feasibility of advance signals or signal priority for transit at Don
Mills and Steeles, allowing buses to move more effectively; impact on east/west
movement; VIVA buses will be equipped with this technology
·
discussion regarding which intersections are considered to be at
capacity; the extent to which signal timing changes will allow more vehicles
through intersections; refinement of signal timing may build more capacity into the system
·
staff and applicant confirmed that both background traffic and
anticipated traffic from proposed development considered in the traffic study
·
traffic accommodations for seniors and disabled was queried
·
current plaza has been successful and has generated considerable traffic
·
residents concerned about peak traffic capacity
Staff
advised that the Town of
·
reduction of parking spaces
·
encourage car-pooling
·
use of smart car rental
·
parking standards/by-law amendments, and
·
shared parking
Staff
reported that another new strategy is the introduction of “unbundling”, which
allows residents to choose how much parking to rent with building space, rather
than automatically including a set number of parking spaces. Residential condominiums may also attract
people who don’t have a car and prefer to use transit, or retirees with only
one car, unlike single family homes that normally generate two cars. There was discussion about the advantages and
disadvantages of parking reduction.
In
response to a query regarding the number of units proposed, Mr. Mihalj provided
a breakdown of the total retail and office square footage, and total
residential units proposed to 2019.
He
explained that the “trip generation comparisons” were based on formulas from
the ITE Trip Generation Manual used across
The Chair requested Members of the Working Group to forward any feedback and comments to Mr. Brian Lee, Manager, Development Engineering, at blee@markham.ca and this information will be reviewed and forwarded to the Consultant.
6. NEW
BUSINESS
A member
of the Working Group made reference to a statement in the Minutes of the
February 25th meeting regarding “the developers’ goals”. Mr.
7. NEXT
STEPS
The Manager of Development Engineering encouraged Members to provide additional
comments in writing within the next two (2) weeks so that they can be dealt
with in a coordinated manner. When the
additional information is received from Mr. P. D’Souza of the City of
Mr.
***A
member of the Working Group queried whether the upcoming meeting of the Working
Group, scheduled for April 28th, would go ahead, and the Chair suggested
that it should be cancelled, as the matter will be considered at the Statutory
Public Meeting scheduled for May 4th.
The Chair
thanked all for attending the meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The Shops
on Steeles Working Group meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
***NOTE:
Subsequent to the meeting, there was further discussion regarding the
need for a meeting the following week, and it was agreed that a meeting would
be held on:
Wednesday, April 28, 2010 at 7:00 pm