Report to: General Committee – Finance & Admin. Date of Meeting: May 17, 2010
SUBJECT: March 2010 Year-To-Date Review of Operations
PREPARED BY: Veronica
Siu, Acting Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the
report dated May 17, 2010 entitled “March 2010 Year-To-Date Review of Operations” be received.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Town
At the end of March
2010, the operating budget results (excluding Planning & Design,
Engineering, Building Services and Waterworks) reflect a favourable variance of
$1.834M. The $1.834M favourable variance
is comprised of favourable variances in Expenditures of $1.237M, and in Revenues
$0.597M, as shown below:
Planning & Design
Planning & Design ended March with a year-to-date unfavourable variance of ($0.030M). This was due to unfavourable variance of ($0.031M) in revenues.
Engineering
Engineering ended March with a year-to-date favourable variance of $1.091M. This was due to a favourable variance of $1.047M in revenues, and a total favourable variance of $0.044M in personnel and non-personnel costs.
Building Services
Building Services ended March year-to-date favourable by $0.395M. This was due to a favourable variance of $0.302M in revenues, and total favourable variance of $0.093 in personnel and non-personnel costs.
Waterworks
Waterworks ended March with a year-to-date unfavourable variance of ($0.082M). This variance was due to an unfavourable variance of ($0.534M) in the net water sales and purchases, offset by total favourable variances of $0.305M in personnel costs and non-personnel costs, and favourable variance of $0.147M in other revenues.
To provide an
overview of the year-to-date financial results at the end of March 2010.
BACKGROUND
There are 5 operating budgets that
are monitored on a monthly basis. The Town’s
primary operating budget (excluding Planning & Design, Engineering,
Building Services and Waterworks) is to support the Town’s day-to-day operations.
The remaining 4 budgets include Planning
& Design, Engineering, Building Services and Waterworks Operating Budgets,
and they are shown separate from the Town’s Operating Budget as they are
primarily user fee funded (e.g. planning and engineering fees, building permit revenue
and revenues based on water consumption, respectively) and separate reserves
have been established for each.
Departments provide details of
significant financial variances (actual to budget) in their areas. The variances are reviewed, substantiated and
summarized by the
YEAR-TO-DATE OPERATING BUDGET VARIANCES:
Town
At the end of three months, the 2010 operating budget (excluding Planning & Design, Engineering, Building Services and Waterworks) results reflected an overall $1.834M favourable variance.
The $1.834M favourable variance was comprised of variances in three main areas of the Town’s operating budget:
$1.260M favourable variance in Non-Personnel Expenditures
$0.597M favourable variance in Revenues
($0.023M) unfavourable variance in Personnel Expenditures
$1.834M
In summary, the $1.834M favourable variance is driven by Winter Maintenance $0.824M, higher than budgeted Tax Interest and Penalties $0.381M and Investment Income $0.196 and timing of various non-personnel expenses $0.408M.
The
remainder of the report provides more details of the variances above, and details
of the Planning & Design, Engineering, Building and Waterworks year-to-date
variances.
At the end of March, Non-Salary expenditures were $1.260M favourable.
Non-Salary Items |
Fav. /
(Unfav.) |
Materials & Supplies |
$0.442 M |
Purchased Services |
$0.776 M |
Other Expenditures |
$0.042 M |
Total Non-Salary Favourable Variance |
$1.260 M |
Materials & Supplies
The favourable variance of $0.442M in Materials and Supplies was due to the following accounts:
Purchased Services
The favourable variance of $0.776M in Purchased Services was due to the following accounts:
REVENUES
At the end of March 2010, revenues were
favourable by $0.597M due to the followings:
Revenue Items |
Fav./(Unfav.) |
General Revenues |
$0.570 M |
User Fees and Service Charges |
$0.058 M |
Grant & Subsidy Revenues |
$0.030 M |
Other Income |
($0.061) M |
Net Favourable Variance |
$0.597 M
|
General
Revenues
The favourable variance of $0.570M was due to tax interest and penalties $0.381M; investment income of $0.196M of which $0.302M was due to the interest rate, offset by unfavourable variance of ($0.106M) due to portfolio balance.
User
Fees and Service Charges
The favourable variance of $0.058M
was primarily due to favourable Recreation revenue of $0.110M (primarily from
fitness revenues), offset by timing of theatre ticket sales in the professional
entertainment series of ($0.068M).
PERSONNEL
EXPENDITURES
The March year-to-date personnel expenditure variance was ($0.023M) unfavourable:
Salary Expenditures Items |
Fav./(Unfav.) |
|
Full Time Salaries net of vacancy backfills |
$0.546 |
M |
Overtime |
($0.047) |
M |
Other Personnel Costs |
($0.067) |
M |
Favourable Variance before Salary Gapping |
$0.432 |
M |
Salary Gapping |
($0.455) |
M |
Salaries & Benefits Favourable Variance |
($0.023) |
M |
The $0.546M favourable variance in full time salaries net of vacancy backfills was the result of 33 net vacant positions. The unfavourable variance of ($0.047M) in overtime was due to the Fire Department, however when compared to the first quarter of 2009, there was a $0.225M improvement in the variance driven by the filling of 15 firefighter vacancies.
Further, the 2010 budget included $0.455M of annual salary gapping savings which has been fully allocated to the individual business units.
Further details on the Town’s
Operating results are provided in Appendix 1.
Planning & Design reported a year-to-date unfavourable variance of ($0.030M) at the end of March (see Appendix 2) due to lower user fees than budget.
This is in comparison to a prior year Planning March year-to-date unfavourable variance of ($0.433M).
Engineering reported a year-to-date favourable variance of $1.091M (see Appendix 3). The favourable revenue variance of $1.047M is due to higher user fees resulting from higher development application activity, and favourable variance of $0.044M in personnel and non-personnel expenditures.
This is in comparison to a prior year Engineering March year-to-date unfavourable variance of ($0.229M).
Building Services reported a favorable variance of $0.395M at the end of three months (refer to Appendix 4). The favourable revenue variance of $0.302M is mainly due to higher building permit revenues, and favourable variance of $0.093M in personnel and non-personnel costs.
This is in comparison to a prior year Building Services March year-to-date unfavourable variance of ($0.1239M).
Waterworks reported a year-to-date unfavourable variance of ($0.082M) at the end of March (see Appendix 5).
The unfavourable variance was due to the net water sales and purchases unfavourable by ($0.534M), as a result of lower water sales and higher than budget unmetered water usage; offset by favourable variances in non-personnel cost of $0.231M, user fees and other charges $0.147M, and personnel costs of $0.074M as a result of 3 average vacancies.
ECONOMIC KEY INDICATORS
In 2009, Staff identified 15 key economic key indicators monitor the Town operations due to the economic downturn. These indicators continue to be monitored in 2010.
Development Related Revenues
The development related revenues include planning, engineering and building fees. These revenues have shown significant growth in the first quarter in 2010 compared to the first quarter in 2009, due to increased development activities resulting from the economic recovery. This is evident in the chart below which outlines the declining trends in the years 2006-2009, followed by a rebound in first quarter of 2010.
YTD March Actual
Development Related Revenues
Development Charges (DC) Revenues
The DC Revenues
in first quarter of 2010 are higher compared to the first quarter in 2009 due
to an increase in new subdivision agreements.
DC Revenues peaked in 2007 as a result of increased development activity
prior to the Region of York’s development charges by-law update, which also
contributed to lower 2008 DC revenues.
In addition, the economic downtown had negatively impacted development
activity and DC revenues in 2008 and 2009.
YTD March Actual DC Revenues
Expenditures
Staff also continued to monitor the spending on winter maintenance. The winter maintenance costs were lower in the first quarter of 2010 compared to that in 2009 due to the milder winter. The winter maintenance expenses peaked at 2009 due to the severe winter conditions.
YTD March Expenditures
The other key economic indicators that are being monitored include financial services administration and legal fees, Recreation and Culture revenues and streetlight maintenance, which have been trending consistent to prior year first quarter actuals.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Staff will provide
a June 2010 year-to-date review of operations and year-end projection in the
Fall of 2010.
RECOMMENDED
BY: ________________________ ________________________
Joel Lustig, Treasure Andy Taylor, Commissioner
Corporate Services
Appendix 1 – Operating Budget - Financial Results for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
Appendix
2 – Operating Budget for Planning & Design - Financial Results for the Three
Months Ended March 31, 2010
Appendix
3 – Operating Budget for Engineering - Financial Results for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2010
Appendix
4 – Operating Budget for Building Services - Financial Results for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2010
Appendix
5 – Operating Budget for Waterworks - Financial Results for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2010