APPENDIX 2
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Local
Government
1b. OPERATING COSTSGovernance and
political support, and corporate management support |
|
Operating costs for governance and
political support, and corporate management and support x100 Total Municipal Operating Costs |
|
7.73% of total
municipal operating costs |
|
Efficiency Measure Governance
and corporate management as a percentage of total municipal operating costs. Objective Efficient municipal
management. |
|
This measure is reported if
a municipality uses the general government categories developed by the
Ontario Municipal CAO’s Benchmarking Initiative (OMBI) and approved by the
province: governance and political support, corporate management and support,
program support. If the OMBI FIR categories were used, general government
is defined as governance and political support, and corporate management and
support. This is shortened to the
phrase “governance and corporate management”. |
Fire Services
2. OPERATING COSTS
|
Operating costs for Fire Services
(Total assessment / 1,000) |
|
$0.83 per $1,000 of
assessment |
|
Efficiency Measure Operating
costs for fire services per $1,000 of assessment. Objective Efficient municipal
fire services. |
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Road Services
|
5. OPERATING COSTS FOR
PAVED ROADS |
6. OPERATING COSTS FOR UNPAVED ROADS |
Operating costs for paved roads
Total paved lane kilometres |
Operating costs for unpaved roads
Total unpaved lane kilometres |
|
$649.08 per paved lane
kilometre |
$4,972.00 per unpaved
lane kilometre |
|
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for paved (hard top) roads per lane
kilometre. Objective Efficient maintenance of paved roads. |
Efficiency
Measure Operating
costs for unpaved (loose top) roads per lane kilometre. Objective Efficient maintenance of unpaved roads. |
7. OPERATING COSTS FOR
WINTER
CONTROL
|
8. CONDITION OF ROADS
|
|
Operating
costs for winter control maintenance of roadways
Total lane kilometres maintained in
winter |
Number of paved lane kilometres rated as good to very good x100 Total number of paved
lane kilometres tested |
|
$1,798.56 per lane
kilometre |
88.57% of lane
kilometres |
|
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for winter control
maintenance of roadways per lane kilometre. Objective Efficient winter control operation. |
Effectiveness Measure Percentage
of paved lane kilometres where condition is rated as good to very good. Objective Provide a paved lane system that has a pavement condition
that meets municipal standards. |
9. WINTER EVENT RESPONSES
|
|
Number of winter event responses
that met or exceeded municipal road
maintenance standards x100
Total number of winter events |
|
98.25% of winter event
responses |
Effectiveness
Percentage
of winter event responses that met or exceeded municipal road maintenance
standards. Objective
Provide appropriate winter response. |
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Wastewater
12a. OPERATING COSTS FOR COLLECTION
|
12b.
OPERATING COSTS FOR
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL
|
|
Operating costs for
collection of wastewater Total kilometres of wastewater
main |
Operating costs for
treatment and disposal of wastewater Total megalitres of
wastewater treated |
|
$4,498.36 per kilometre
of main |
$386.50 per megalitre |
|
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for the
collection of wastewater per kilometre of wastewater main. Objective Efficient wastewater collection services. |
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for the treatment and disposal of
wastewater per megalitre. A megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or 1,000
cubic metres. Objective Efficient water treatment and disposal services. |
|
This measure is reported only if the municipality is responsible
for wastewater collection and wastewater treatment and disposal. Municipalities with integrated systems may also report the
individual measures for collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater. |
|
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Wastewater
|
12c. OPERATING
COSTS FOR COLLECTION TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL |
13. MAIN
BACKUPS BA |
|
Operating costs for
wastewater collection, treatment and disposal Total megalitres of
wastewater treated |
Total number of backed
up wastewater mains Total kilometres of
wastewater mains /100 |
|
$479.41 per megalitre |
1.69 per 100 kilometres
of main |
|
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for
collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater per megalitre. A megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or 1,000
cubic metres. Objective Efficient wastewater services. |
Effectiveness Measure Number of wastewater main backups per 100 kilometres of wastewater
main in a year. Objective Prevention of human and environmental health hazards. |
|
This measure is reported only if the municipality is responsible
for wastewater collection and wastewater treatment and disposal. Municipalities with
integrated systems may also report the individual measures for collection,
treatment and disposal of wastewater. |
|
14. TREATMENT BYPASS
|
|
Estimated megalitres of untreated wastewater x100 Total megalitres of wastewater,
including treated and untreated |
|
N/A |
|
Effectiveness
Measures Percentage
of wastewater estimated to have by-passed treatment. A
megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres or 1,000 cubic metres. Objective Effective wastewater and treatment and disposal services. |
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Water
Services
|
15a. OPERATING COSTS FOR TREATMENT |
15b. OPERATING COSTS
FOR DISTRIBUTION
|
15c. OPERATING COSTS FOR TREATMENT AND
DISTRIBUTION |
|
Operating costs for treatment of water Total megalitres treated |
Operating
costs for distribution of water
Total kilometres of distribution pipe |
Operating costs for treatment and distribution
of water Total megalitres treated |
|
$421.70 per megalitre |
$6,773.73 per
kilometre of distribution pipe |
$583.68 per megalitre |
|
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for the
treatment of water per megalitre. A megalitre equals
1,000,000 litres, or 1,000 cubic metres. Objective Efficient production of potable water. |
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for the
distribution of water per kilometre of water distribution pipe. Objective Efficient distribution of water. |
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for the treatment
and distribution of water per megalitre (Integrated System). A
megalitre equals 1,000,000 litres, or 1,000 cubic metres. Objective Efficient production and distribution of
water. |
|
This measure is reported if the
municipality is responsible for the treatment of water. This measure is optional
for municipalities with integrated water systems since the FIR does not
record the measure. |
This measure is reported if
the municipality is responsible for the distribution of water. This measure is optional
for municipalities with integrated water systems since the FIR does not
record the measure. |
This measure is reported
only if the municipality is responsible for both the treatment and
distribution of water. Municipalities with integrated systems may also
report the individual measures for treatment of water, and distribution of
water. |
|
16. BREAKS IN WATER MAINS |
17. BOIL WATER ADVISORIES
|
|
Number of breaks in water mains
Total kilometres of water main pipe / 100
|
Summation of: number of boil
water advisory days times the number of affected connections Total connections in service
area |
|
5.69 breaks per 100
kilometres of main |
0 days a year |
|
Effectiveness
Measure Number of breaks in water mains per
100 kilometres of water main pipe in a year. Objective Improve system
reliability and minimize water loss and operational costs. |
Effectiveness Measure Weighted number of days when a boil
water advisory issued by the Medical Officer of Health, applicable to a
municipal water supply, was in effect. ObjectiveWater is safe and meets local needs. |
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Solid Waste
|
18a. OPERATING COSTS FOR COLLECTION |
18b. OPERATING
COSTS
FOR DISPOSAL
|
|
Operating costs for solid waste collection
Total tonnes received from all property classes
OR
total households
|
Operating costs for solid waste disposal
Total tonnes disposed from all property classes OR
total households |
|
|
$62.32 per tonne |
$55.74 per tonne |
|
|
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for garbage
collection per tonne or per household. Objective Efficient collection services without adverse
affect on environment. |
Efficiency Measure Operating costs for garbage
disposal per tonne or per household.
Objective Efficient disposal of solid waste. |
|
|
This
measure is reported by municipalities which are responsible for garbage
collection. This
measure is optional for municipalities with integrated solid waste management
systems. A
municipality is required to report result in total tonnes. If tonnage figure is unavailable, the
household numbers may be used. |
This measure is reported by
municipalities which are responsible for solid waste disposal. This
measure is optional for municipalities with integrated solid waste management
systems. A municipality is required to report
result in total tonnes. If tonnage
figure is unavailable, the household numbers may be used. |
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Solid Waste
|
19. OPERATING COSTS FOR DIVERSION |
19A. OPERATING COSTS – NET OF REVENUES FOR
DIVERSION |
Operating costs for solid waste diversion
Total tonnes diverted OR
total households |
Operating costs for solid waste diversion
Total tonnes diverted OR
total households |
|
$216.21 per tonne |
N/A |
|
Efficiency Measure Operating
costs for solid waste diversion (recycling) per tonne or per household.
Objective Waste programs divert garbage from landfills and incinerators. |
Efficiency Measure Operating
costs for solid waste diversion (recycling) per tonne or per household.
Objective Waste programs divert garbage from landfills and incinerators. |
|
This measure is reported by
municipalities which are responsible for solid waste diversion. This
measure is optional for municipalities with integrated solid waste management
systems. A
municipality is required to report result in total tonnes. If tonnage figure is unavailable, the
household numbers may be used. |
This measure is reported by
municipalities which are responsible for solid waste diversion. This
measure is optional for municipalities with integrated solid waste management
systems. A
municipality is required to report result in total tonnes. If tonnage figure is unavailable, the
household numbers may be used. |
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Solid Waste
20. OPERATING
COSTS
FOR INTEGRATED SYSTEM
|
|
Operating costs for solid waste
management Total tonnes disposed of and total
tonnes diverted OR total households |
|
$152.20 per tonne |
|
Efficiency Measure Average
operating costs for solid waste management (collection, disposal and
diversion) per tonne or per household. Objective Efficient solid waste management programs. |
|
This measure is reported
only by those municipalities with integrated solid waste management
systems. These municipalities are
responsible for garbage collection, garbage disposal, and solid waste
diversion (recycling). Municipalities with integrated systems may, if
desired, report the individual measures for garbage collection, garbage
disposal, and solid waste diversion (recycling). A municipality is required to report
result in total tonnes. If tonnage
figure is unavailable, the household numbers may be used. |
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Solid
Waste
|
21a. FACILITY COMPLIANCE |
21b. NUMBER OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SITES |
22. COMPLAINTS
FOR SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION |
|
Total number of days per year MOE
compliance order was in effect |
Total number of waste management sites |
Number of Complaints
Total Households / 1,000 |
|
0 days |
4 sites |
28.67 complaints per
1,000 households |
|
Effectiveness
Measure Number of days per year
when a Ministry of Environment compliance order for remediation concerning an
air or groundwater standard was in effect for a solid waste management facility,
by site. Objective Municipal solid waste
services do not have an adverse affect on environment. |
Effectiveness Measure Total number of solid waste
management sites owned by municipality.
Objective Effective management
of solid waste. |
Effectiveness Measure Number of complaints
received in a year concerning the collection of solid waste and recycled
materials per 1,000 households.
Objective Effective waste management services. |
|
23a.
DIVERSION OF SOLID WASTE |
|
|
Total tonnes of residential waste diverted x100
Total tonnes of residential solid waste
disposed of and total tonnes diverted |
|
|
34.61% of solid waste |
|
|
Effectiveness Measure Percentage of residential
solid waste diverted.
Objective Municipal waste programs divert garbage from landfills and
incinerators. |
|
|
This measure is reported if the municipality records
tonnage for residential solid waste separately from ICI tonnage. |
|
Town of Markham • Year 2002 Report
Land Use Planning
24. GROWTH AND SETTLEMENT PATTERN
|
Number of new lots, blocks and / or units
with final
approval which are located within the settlement area x100
Total number of new lots,
blocks and / or units with final approval within
entire municipality |
|
100.00% of new development |
|
Effectiveness Measure Percentage of new development with final approval
which is located within settlement areas.
Objective New lot creation is occurring in settlement areas. |
|
25a. PRESERVATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND IN
REPORTING YEAR |
25b. CHANGE IN NUMBER OF
DESIGNATED HECTARES IN REPORTING YEAR |
Hectares of land designated for
agricultural purposes
in the
Official Plan as of December 31, 2001
X100
Hectares of land designated for
agricultural
purposes in the Official Plan as of January 1, 2001
|
Number of hectares of land originally
designated for agricultural purposes which was re-designated for other uses
during 2001.
|
|
100.00%
of agricultural land (reporting year) |
0 hectares |
|
Effectiveness Measure Percentage
of land designated for agricultural purposes which was preserved during 2001.
Objective Preserve agricultural land. |
Effectiveness Measure Number of hectares of land originally designated
for agricultural purposes which was re-designated for other uses during 2001.
Objective Preserve agricultural land. |
|
25c. AGRICULTURAL LAND RELATIVE TO BASE YEAR |
25d. REDESIGNATED AGRICULTURAL LAND |
Hectares of land designated for
agricultural purposes
in the Official Plan as
of December 31, 2001 X100
Hectares of land designated for
agricultural
purposes in the Official Plan as of January 1, 2000
|
Number of hectares of land originally
designated for agricultural purposes which was re-designated for other uses
relative to base year.
|
|
100.00%
of agricultural land (relative to base year) |
0
hectares |
|
Effectiveness Measure Percentage
of land designated for agricultural purposes which was preserved relative to
base year of 2000.
Objective Preserve agricultural land. |
Effectiveness Measure Number of hectares of land originally designated
for agricultural purposes which was re-designated for other uses since
January 1, 2000.
Objective Preserve agricultural land. |
q:\2003finadminctteereports\0359mpmp
esults2002appendix2_2002.doc