|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of
Development Services Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of
Planning & Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Geoffrey Singer, Planner, East
District |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
July 7, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Cornell Rouge Development
Corporation (Madison Homes / Forest Hill
Homes) 19TM-030006 (Phase 1) Cornell Planning District SU.03-109544 & ZA.03-109541 |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That
the record of the Public Meeting held on May 20, 2003 with respect to the
applications by Cornell Rouge Development Corporation
for draft plan of subdivision approval and
implementing zoning be received;
That the first phase (432 units) of plan of subdivision 19TM-03006 (Cornell Rouge Development Corporation) be draft approved subject to the conditions outlined in Appendix ‘A’, and the payment of the required 30% subdivision processing fee in accordance with the Town’s Tariff of Fees By-law; and the following red line revisions:
· The distribution of dwelling types (singles, semis, townhouses) and lot sizes to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Development Services based on the “Phase 1 Concept Plan” drawing prepared by KLM Planning Partners Inc., dated June 24, 2003 and attached as Figure 5 to the Planning staff report dated July 7, 2003.
· Reduce the number of units from 433 to 432.
· Delete Block 349 and include its areas in the adjacent lot fabric.
· Buffer Blocks adjoining 16th Avenue and the future Markham By-pass to be finalized to the satisfaction of the Town of Markham and the Region of York.
That the application to amend Zoning By-laws 304-87
and 177-96 for the first phase be approved, and the implementing amendments be
enacted;
That
water supply allocation for 432 units be granted, such allocation to be from
the total allocation available for the Cornell Secondary Plan area;
That
the Town reserves the right to revoke or reallocate the water supply allocation
should the development not proceed in a timely manner;
-and
further-
That
staff report on the appropriateness of the inclusion of 9 metre wide, 25 metre
deep lots in future phases of Cornell once 50% of the buildings on such lots in
the first phase subdivision have been occupied for a minimum of 6 months and
the associated tree planting and fencing has been completed.
PURPOSE:
The
purpose of this report is to recommend conditions of approval and approval of
implementing zoning for the first phase (432 units) of a draft plan of
subdivision in Cornell.
BACKGROUND:
Property and Area Context
The subject lands are 27.703 hectares (68.45 acres) in area and are located within the Cornell Community with frontage on the south side of 16th Avenue and also on the east side of the existing Markham By-pass and the west side of the future Markham By-pass (see Figure 1). The lands are currently vacant and in agricultural use.
To the north, across 16th Avenue, are lands that are currently in agricultural production as well as additional lands within the Cornell Community that have been draft-approved for development to the northwest. To the south are additional lands owned by the applicant that extend to Highway 7, between the existing Markham By-Pass and the future Markham By-pass. To the east, beyond the future Markham By-pass are lands within the Rouge Park North. To the west, across the existing Markham By-pass, are lands that are currently in agricultural production and are also the subject of applications for draft approval and rezoning (Mattamy) (see Figures 2 & 4).
The applicant is seeking draft plan approval for a 433 unit first phase of a 487 unit draft plan of subdivision (Figure 3). A concept plan, attached as Figure 5, further illustrates the proposed lotting. The first phase of the plan consists of the following:
· 433 grade-related dwellings, all served by a rear lane, as follows:
Unit Type |
Residential
Units
|
Lot Dimensions |
|
|
|
Single Detached |
80 95 111 |
12.0
m x 25 m (39.4 ft. x 82 ft.) 11.0
m x 25 m (36.1 ft. x 82 ft.) 9.0
m x 25 m (29.5 ft. x 82 ft.) |
Semi-Detached |
66 |
7
m x 25 m (22.9 ft. x 82 ft.) |
Townhouses |
81 |
4.5 m x 31 m (14.8 ft. x 101.7 ft.) |
· A mixed-use building containing a café or small store on the ground floor, and apartment above, which will act as a neighbourhood centre, on the north side of the extension of White’s Hill Avenue east of Street “1”. This building will face onto a small parkette (urban open space).
· An elementary school block 2.46 hectares (6.1 acres) in area abutting the east side of the existing Markham By-pass. (Block 345)
· Two parks. The first park is centred around the existing woodlot and is 2.84 hectares (7 acres) in area (Block 346). The second park is on the east side of Street “11” and is 0.49 hectares (1.2 acres) in area (Block 347).
· An urban open space located in the neighbourhood centre at the northeast corner of the intersection of the extension of White’s Hill Avenue and Street “1” and is 0.07 hectares (0.2 acres) in area (Block 348).
· Linear open spaces (landscape buffers) along the existing Markham By-pass (future 16th Avenue). The landscape buffers link a series of parkettes which connect the buffers to the internal street network. The buffers and parkettes total 0.31 hectares (0.8 acres) in area.
The Official Plan designates the majority of the lands as Urban Residential and a portion around the woodlot as Environmental Protection Area. The Cornell Secondary Plan designates the lands a combination of Neighbourhood General, Neighbourhood Centre, Neighbourhood Park, Open Space, Open Space – Environmentally Significant Area, and Elementary School. The proposed draft plan is fully lane-based as required by the Secondary Plan and includes higher density uses in the area designated as Neighbourhood Centre (at the intersection of the extension of White’s Hill Avenue and Street “1”, a new north-south minor collector road) in accordance with the policies of the Secondary Plan. By-law 304-87 currently zones the lands Agricultural One (A1) and Open Space Two (O2).
Proposed plan is consistent with principles of New Urbanism and Cornell Secondary Plan
The proposed draft plan of subdivision is consistent with the principles of New Urbanism and provides the basis for a fully lane-based community that is compact, pedestrian-oriented and transit-supportive. Approval of the draft plan and rezoning would continue the implementation of the Cornell Secondary Plan, extending the pattern of development east from the existing Markham By-Pass to the ultimate Markham By-Pass.
The
plan is well structured and includes a number of attractive features, most
notably:
On May 20, 2003, a public meeting
was held to consider the proposed draft plan of subdivision and zoning by-law
amendment. Gary Atkins, representing
the Cornell Ratepayers Association, advised Committee that the ratepayers
association is generally satisfied with the applicant’s plans. Mr. Atkins suggested that the fences
proposed by the applicant to close the rear yards off from the lanes should be
low and “see through” in order that residents can see into the lanes. He also expressed concern that future phases
of Cornell need to include more retail/commercial uses. Committee requested that the applicant speak
to Mr. Atkins about these concerns.
Committee discussed the height of the fences at the lanes and generally
concurred with Mr. Atkin’s position that these fences should be kept low.
(There was some discussion to the effect that the lane fence heights should be
limited to 40 inches or 1 metre).
Reduced Lot Depth Pilot Project
In the existing Cornell community, lots are generally a minimum of 31 metres (102 feet) in depth. This depth allows the garage to be a separate building at the rear of the lot and the outdoor amenity area (back yard) to be located between the house and the garage.
The applicant is proposing that the majority of the lots on the proposed plan of subdivision be 25 metres (82 feet) in depth. The homes proposed on these lots include garages attached to the rear of the home, with the outdoor amenity area beside the garage and driveway.
On lots having a frontage of 11 metres or greater, there is sufficient area to accommodate a rear attached double car garage and a spacious well proportioned outdoor amenity area. However, on smaller frontage lots such as the 9 metre single detached and 7 metre semi-detached lots proposed by the applicant, staff have concerns with respect to the potential impact of the rear attached single car garages; specifically:
· The area beside the garage and driveway (the outdoor amenity area) is less than 4 metres (13 feet) wide for the 7 metre semi-detached units and 5.2 metres (17 feet) for the 9 metre single detached units.
· The outdoor amenity area is highly exposed to the lane and the driveway.
· There is sufficient width to accommodate only a single car garage. The garage therefore needs set back from the lane in order that the second required parking space can be accommodated on the driveway leading to the garage and the lane. This could result in the lanes appearing to be inordinately wide.
· Some residents may attempt to widen their driveways in the future to create independently accessible parking spaces. This could effectively eliminate any meaningful outdoor amenity area.
To address these concerns, the applicant agreed to the following plan revisions and measures:
· Mixing lots - with generally no more than three - 9 metre lots in a row separated by not less than three - 11 or 12 metre lots. (This reduced the total number of 9 metre lots from 42% of total units on the original submission to 25% of total units on the current plan.)
· All flankage lots to be 11 or 12 metre lots. These homes will have double car garages located at the lane which will reduce the visibility into the lane from the adjoining street.
· The semi-detached homes facing 16th Avenue are to incorporate a useable outdoor amenity area either in the form of a wrap around porch or a second storey deck
· Fencing to close the rear yards off from the lanes. Staff are concerned that the 1 metre height for these fences as discussed at the Public Meeting may not provide sufficient separation between the yards and the lanes and recommend a modest increase to 1.2 metres.
· Planting one tree in the rear yard of each dwelling adjoining the lane.
Staff are prepared to recommend the applicant’s proposed lotting as a pilot project, subject to the following conditions, which are included in the recommended conditions of draft approval (Appendix ‘A’), and would be secured in the subdivision agreement:
1. An acknowledgement by the applicant as follows (Condition 6.1):
2. The special designs for the semi-detached homes facing 16th Avenue and the rear yard fencing and tree planting as outlined above (Conditions 6.2 and 6.3).
In 2002 a draft revised Open Space Master Plan was prepared for the Cornell community with the assistance of George Dark of Urban Strategies Inc., one of the consultants involved in the preparation of the original master plan in 1994. This plan, which was focused primarily on the quantity and distribution of parkspace, was prepared through a series of workshops involving landowners, residents, public agencies. The draft revised Open Space Master Plan shows an open space system consisting of one large (35 – 40 acre) central park and many small parkettes, whereas the original plan shows of a system of dispersed neighbourhood parks, often campussed with schools.
Duany Plater Zyberk and Company was subsequently retained by the Town with the financial assistance of the applicant and Mattamy Homes to review and update the housing product for Cornell, with the emphasis on exploring opportunities to provide a greater diversity of housing product in future phases; and to refine the street, block and open space layout shown of the draft Open Space Master Plan. Andres Duany presented the outcome of this exercise to the Town on June 12/13. Staff are currently finalizing the new master plan for Cornell in consultation with the agencies, landowners and residents and will be preparing an updated secondary plan to correspond to the new master plan.
The applicant has participated actively in this process and the proposed draft plan is consistent with the evolving direction of the new Master Plan. A number of significant revisions were made to the structure of this plan, at the suggestion of Andres Duany. Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company has reviewed the latest proposed plan of subdivision and is satisfied that it is consistent with the principles of New Urbanism, and can be supported.
Cornell has a remaining approved water allocation of 2178 units. The members of the developers group have negotiated a division of the water allocation providing the subject lands with 432 units (Appendix “B”). The applicant is requesting approval of a first phase (Figure 3) that corresponds with the approved water allocation. (One additional unit beyond the allocation is shown on the proposed concept plan and is recommended to be removed by red-line revision.)
Recommended conditions of draft approval are attached as Appendix “A”. In addition to the standard conditions and those outlined above, the following special conditions should be noted:
·
The
Owner is required to enter into a Developers Group Agreement to ensure
provision of community and common facilities such as school sites, municipal
services, parks and public roads in the Cornell Secondary Plan area, including
provisions requiring the Group to assume the obligations contained in the
School Site Agreement between Law Development Group and the Town. These
obligations include the conveyance of parkland at a rate of 5 acres per 1000
population as well as the conveyance of woodlots, urban open space areas and
landscape buffers to the Town at no cost.
·
The
area of parkland to be dedicated to the Town within the proposed draft plan is
based on the neighbourhood park component of the overall required
dedication. The community park
component (1 acre per 1000 people) will be attributed to a larger community
park to be located south of 16th Avenue and which will serve the
entire Cornell community.
·
The
Developers Group is required to prepare an update to the Development Phasing
Plan for the Cornell Community and enter into a legal agreement documenting the
Group’s commitment to a number of items including the schedule for the
completion of Bur Oak Avenue through the Cornell community and the provision of
road connections to the existing Markham By-pass.
Implementing
zoning
The
implementing zoning by-laws for the first phase development are attached as
Appendix “C”. The by-laws include a specific
exception to permit the proposed attached garage product on lots having less
than 11 metres frontage.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
No
financial implications are to be considered in this report.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The
proposed draft plan is being reviewed by Town Departments and external
agencies. Department/agency
requirements will be incorporated in the plan, conditions of draft approval and
implementing zoning by-law as required.
ATTACHMENTS:
Figure
1 - Applicant/Agent & Location Map
Figure
2 - Area Context/Zoning
Figure
3 – Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision
Figure
4 – Aerial Photo
Figure
5 – Phase 1 Concept Plan
Appendix
‘A’ -
Recommended conditions of draft approval
Appendix
‘B’ -
Letter regarding water allocation
Appendix
‘C’ -
Draft by-law amendments
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
DOCUMENT: q:\development\planning\appl\subdiv\03109544
cornell rouge development corp\final report.doc
LOCATION MAP: