|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Sheila Birrell, Town Clerk |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
same as above |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2004-05-25 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Municipal Elections |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Council of the Town of
Markham petition the Province of Ontario for:
·
An improved municipal election voters’ list;
·
Amendments to The Municipal Elections
Act that would require residents to provide proof of identification and
qualification;
And that the
Town Clerk participate on the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and
Treasurers of Ontario Election Team and the subcommittee established to review
the issues surrounding the problems with the voters’ list;
That, in the event of an improved voters’
list, staff investigate internet voting and vote by mail as alternative methods
of voting;
And that staff be directed to proceed with a public
meeting to receive input on the Election Sign By-Law and the proposed revisions
outlined in Schedule “C”.
PURPOSE:
To report on election issues as
requested by the Finance & Administrative Committee on February 16, 2004.
BACKGROUND:
At the Finance & Administrative Committee meeting on February 16, 2004, the following resolution was passed:
“That the report
dated February 16, 2004 from the Town Clerk be referred back to staff for
consideration of issues raised this date;
And that a Council
Work Session be scheduled to review these issues in greater detail.”
BACKGROUND: (cont’d.)
In deferring the
matter, the Committee requested that staff provide information on the following
issues:
·
Voters’ list
·
Proof of identification; security measures
·
Internet voting and other alternative methods of
voting
·
Election cost comparisons with other municipalities
·
Campaign rebate program
·
Sign placement and removal; deposit, infractions and
enforcement;
·
Materials provided to candidates
·
Performance of staff at polling stations; training
·
Performance of scrutineers
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:
The 2003 Municipal
Election Staff in Markham took the Town of Markham from a manual count system
of ballot processing to a three-way integrated electronic process that included
internet voting, touch screen, and poll counting equipment. 17% of the more than 42,000 votes cast were
cast over the internet. There were no
requests for recounts or applications to the court for controverted
elections. The timely presentation of
the results was well received by the public.
Voters’ List
Participation by the Town Clerk on the Association of
Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers Association Elections Team and the
Sub-committee on the issues surrounding the voters’ list is recommended. Confirmation of the
appointment to the Municipal Election Act Project Team for the 2004-2007 term
has been received. The appointment to
the Team was confirmed by the A.M.C.T.O. Legislative Committee at their meeting
held on Thursday, May 13th, 2004. The
team will commence meeting the second week in June.
Proof of identification;
security measures
In the absence of revisions to The Municipal Elections Act, staff are recommending proof of
identification from voters who are on the list and who are not on the
list. They will be required to provide
two pieces of identity, i.e. a photo ID/Health card/Driver’s licence with an address
and a utility or credit card bill or one other piece of identification showing
residence. The Communications Plan will
include prior notification of same to all residents.
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION: (cont’d.)
Alternative Methods of
Voting
Staff are recommending that, in the
absence of an improved voters’ list, the use of alternative methods of
voting—with the exception of optic scan equipment—not be undertaken. Schedule “A” comprises information on various
alternative methods of voting.
Election cost comparisons
with other municipalities
The cost per resident for the
election process varies from municipality to municipality. Those municipalities owning their own optic
scan equipment experience lower costs after the first three elections. Leasing equipment represents significant
costs. However, some municipalities have
leased equipment from municipalities in other provinces for less. Outright purchase usually has a three election
payback. Schedule “B” is a compilation
of comparables.
Campaign Rebate Program
The costs to date for the 2003
Election Campaign Contribution Rebate Program are $123,150., versus Ajax at
$17,500 in 2003, Oakville at $19,000 in 2003 and Toronto at $1,250,000. in
2000.
Election Signs
Staff are recommending that a
public meeting be held to gather input on the proposed revisions to the
Election Sign By-Law outlined in Schedule “C”.
Some comparables have been gathered and tabulated in Schedule “D”.
Materials
Schedule “E” lists most of the
materials provided to candidates. (See Schedule
“E”) Staff have taken previous comments
respecting the maps into account and will endeavour to improve them for the
2006 election.
Polling Staff
Each election it becomes
increasingly difficult to secure sufficient polling staff. That fact is instrumental in recommendations
for alternative methods of voting.
Alternative methods of voting results in less polling staff. Staff have taken into account previous
comments and are currently working on improved methods for training.
Scrutineers
Candidates are provided with
information on the role and responsibility of scrutineers. It is solely the responsibility of the
candidate to instruct and oversee scrutineers.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
Accessibility considerations will be considered
in determining the method of alternative voting and in the establishment of
poll locations.
ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
None
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED
AND AFFECTED:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule “A”
Information on Alternative Methods of Voting
Schedule “B” -
Election Cost Comparisons
Schedule “C” – Proposed Election Sign By-Law
Revisions
Schedule “D” -
Comparable Election Sign Regulations
Schedule “D” -
List of Election Materials
|
|
|
Sheila Birrell, Town Clerk. |
|
Andy Taylor, Commissioner of Corporate Services |