Terms of Reference
Environmental Policy
Review and Consolidation Strategy (Revised)
Development Services
Commission
January 2007
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Town of
The Town of
Ø
Ø
recommendations of appropriate watershed policies;
and,
Ø
a habitat monitoring protocol to evaluate the
success of the Town’s Natural Heritage System enhancement policies.
In addition, to the delineation of the preliminary
The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Strategy should be completed
within approximately 10 months of the execution of the study contract. The award of this contract is subject to Markham
Council’s approval. The Town reserves
the right not to award this contract.
2.0 BACKGROUND
In 2004 the Town commenced the Environmental Policy Review and
Consolidation Study. The study was suspended due to the policy and
mapping implications of the pending Provincial Greenbelt initiative. The revised
Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation study generally combines the
study objectives of the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study,
delineation of the
The following studies and initiatives will inform the Natural Heritage
System Strategy.
2.1 Natural Features Study
In 1993, the Town of Markham Natural Features Study (NFS) was completed
and subsequently implemented in the urban area through Official Plan Amendment
No. 52. The NFS provided a Town-wide strategy for the protection,
enhancement and restoration of natural features based on target objectives to
increase natural vegetated areas and upland woodlots based on a connected
system of nodes and corridors. Since the NFS was completed, a number of
significant policy objectives have been adopted and supported by Council, which
modify the natural features footprint by increasing potential forest along the
2.2
OPA No. 52 (Natural Features Policies for the Urban Area)
In 1998, the Region of York approved Official Plan Amendment No. 52
(Policies to Protect, Restore and Enhance Natural Features in the Urban
Development Area) which implemented the Town’s Natural Features Study (1993)
for the Urban Development Area. OPA
No. 52 generally applies to lands in the Town of
2.3 OPA No. 140 (Rouge North Management Area)
In 2001, the Town of
2.4 OPA No. 117 (Oak Ridges Moraine)
In 2003, the Town of
2.5 TRCA Flood Plain Mapping
The
2.6 TRCA Terrestrial Natural
The TRCA has prepared a strategy designed to enhance biodiversity of terrestrial
habitats by increasing the amount of forest and wetland habitats to an overall
target within their jurisdiction of 30%. At the time of preparation of this
Terms of Reference the strategy had not been forwarded to the Town for formal
comments and/or endorsation. The TRCA strategy requires municipal
partnership and authority to implement the strategy. The Town of
Markham Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study should have regard
for the TNHSS strategy and provide a response to the TNHSS relative to other
Provincial, Regional and local objectives and obligations.
2.7
Watershed Plan for the Duffins Creek
In 2003, the Town of
2.8
Rouge Watershed Plan (draft)
The TRCA and Rouge Park Alliance have prepared a draft Watershed Plan for the
Rouge. At the time of preparation of this Terms of Reference the Watershed
Plan was still in draft form. The Town of
2.9
The Town is undertaking a Small Steam Study to provide protection and
management guidelines for the small streams and drainage features. The
study includes a policy review component. The Environmental Policy Review
and Consolidation Study shall have regard for the
2.10 Eastern
In 2003, the Town of
2.11
Groundwater Protection
The Region of
York, in partnership with the TRCA has undertaken significant research related
to the groundwater system. Sensitive groundwater discharge and recharge
areas have been identified through the Rouge Watershed Study. A
recommended approach to groundwater protection issues and requirements is
required as part of the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study.
2.12 Secondary Use Program for Hydro Corridors
In 2003, the
Province of Ontario, Ontario Reality Corporation, introduced the Secondary Use
Program for Hydro Corridors and has provided municipalities with the
opportunity to contribute provide input to guide appropriate secondary uses,
which may include greening and naturalization efforts that do not conflict with
the primary transmission use. The Environmental Policy Review and
Consolidation Study should review opportunities for enhanced naturalization of
these corridors.
2.13
The
Province approved the Greenbelt Plan in 2005 requiring municipalities to amend
their Official Plan to address Greenbelt Plan conformity within five years.
The Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study will recognize the
2.14
Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe Area
The
Province approved the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe Area in 2006
requiring municipalities to develop a growth management strategy to address
Provincial growth requirements regarding urban intensification and
2.15
Federal Green Space Lands
The
Natural Heritage System Strategy will have regard for the Federal Government
announcement in 2001 to protect a Green Space corridor along the western edge
of Transport
2.16 Region of
The
Natural Heritage System Strategy will have regard for and complement the Region
of York Greenlands System.
2.17
Other Senior Government Initiatives
The Natural Heritage System Strategy shall review and have regard for senior
government initiatives and responsibilities which delineate areas for natural
heritage protection including Provincially Significant Wetlands, Areas of
Natural and Scientific Interest and Environmentally Significant Areas.
3.0 STUDY AREA
The study area applies to the Town of
4.0
STUDY PURPOSE
The purpose of the study is to provide the
Town with mapping and related information for a Natural
5.0 STUDY
STRUCTURE
The study is presently seen as proceeding in four phases.
Phase I
Mapping and data
base of existing natural heritage features and preliminary natural heritage system.
Activities:
Ø Confirm and map the existing natural features in
the Natural Features Study data, Region of York woodlot coverage, Provincial
wetlands and woodlands coverage,
Ø Confirm and ground truth existing natural features
where appropriate.
Ø Identify land area attributed to existing natural
heritage features and policy areas and confirm baseline conditions and local
natural heritage system targets in a format comparable to Region of York and
TRCA data including acreages.
Ø Assess relationship to Natural Features Study
(1993) baseline conditions.
Ø Confirm/revise Town goal, objectives and targets
for Natural Heritage System relative to Natural Features Study (1993), Region
of York and TRCA’s TNHSS natural heritage targets.
Ø Identify and map upper-tier environmental policy
areas including Greenbelt Plan Area boundary, Oak Ridges Moraine boundary,
Federal Green Space boundary and
Ø Identify and map the preliminary Rouge North
boundary in accordance with the boundary delineation criteria identified in OPA
No. 140 and using the Rouge North Implementation Manual for guidance for the
Middles Reaches and Little Rouge Creek policy areas with supporting cursory
survey from adjacent roads.
Ø Identify and map preliminary small stream features
in the Town through a desk top mapping exercise and cursory survey from
adjacent roads (subject to Council endorsement of Study).
Ø Identify and map natural heritage features
enhancement requirements and bufffers, established in Provincial or Municipal
policy including valleyland and woodlot buffers, Oak Ridges Moraine features Vegetation
Protection Zones and Greenbelt Countryside and Natural Heritage System
requirements outside of the Rouge watershed.
Ø Review and consider additional mapping and policy
opportunities, where appropriate, for enhancing the Town’s Natural Heritage
System, identified in the Provincial Natural Heritage System (if available)
and TRCA’s Terrestrial Natural Heritage System Strategy. Where
enhancement lands within these policy areas are identified on lands outside of
the Greenbelt Plan area, evaluation criteria shall be prepared to assess
additional enhancement lands and securement and protection options.
Ø Identify sensitive groundwater features and systems
relative to groundwater seepage areas, aquifer vulnerability areas or discharge
areas using existing data in accordance with Growth Plan for the Greater Golden
Horseshoe area, Provincial Policy Statement, Source Water Protection
Ø
Review and assess
agricultural classification and existing Provincial LEAR assessment (subject to
availability) to determine long-term agricultural classifications and approach
for agricultural, rural and countryside designations within Greenbelt Plan area.
Phase 2 a)
Detailed Rouge North boundary on selected sites
(This is an optional phase subject to
landowner funding and property access.)
Activities:
Ø
Consultants, Town staff and
landowners to determine appropriate sites for further detailed boundary
delineation based on landowner participation and funding.
Ø
Delineate the detailed Rouge
North boundary for selected sites of a sufficient size (concession blocks)
using the boundary delineation criteria in the RNMP Implementation Manual.
Ø
A representative number of
site locations shall be selected within the watershed and shall include both
Ø
The detailed boundary
delineation shall be confirmed by a Review Committee comprising study
consultants, Town staff, TRCA staff, landowners and
Phase 2 b)
Preparation of
draft policies and approaches for new natural heritage system policies.
Activities:
Ø
Prepare draft Greenbelt
Plan conformity strategy and policy framework.
Ø
Review and identify
appropriate policy approach for groundwater resources.
Ø
Review and assess
appropriate
Ø
Review and assess
appropriate watershed and subwatershed implementation policies for Petticoat
and Duffins Creek, Rouge and Don Rivers watersheds and recommend a policy
framework.
Ø
Identify policy options and
incentives for the securement of lands into public ownership.
Ø
Review and recommend other
environmental policy areas which should be addressed as part of a future growth
management exercise (infrastructure, sustainability, transportation, air
quality etc).
Phase 3
Policy/Official Plan Framework for implementation
of Natural Heritage System incorporating existing, approved and adopted
policies (Rouge Park, Natural Features for the Urban area, Oak Ridges Moraine)
and additional policies (watershed policies, small streams policies, Greenbelt
Plan conformity policies, agricultural policies and groundwater
policies).
Activities:
Ø
Review and prepare an
organizational policy framework for Official Plan policies, designations and
mapping including any recommended changes to designation terms and mapping (
Ø
Prepare draft policy
framework.
Phase 4
Preparation of Habitat Monitoring Protocol
Ø
Prepare a draft habitat monitoring
protocol to monitor success in habitat and vegetation enhancement policies on a
yearly basis to be coordinated in conjunction with restoration programs
underway by Rouge Park Alliance, TRCA and other groups and organizations who
participate in natural area restoration programs in the Town.
The study consultants are encouraged to identify in their
proposal additional requirements to the study objectives list that they would
recommend be considered and highlight them accordingly.
Each
phase is to be completed to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Development
Services, and progress to the next phase or any further work will be subject to
authorization by the Commissioner of Development Services
6.0
STAFF, COUNCIL AND PUBLIC INPUT
The study process shall include a Technical Advisory Committee comprised
of Town staff, TRCA staff and staff from appropriate Provincial agencies to
ensure the study recommendations reflect current agency and Provincial policy
with respect to natural heritage identification and protection. The consultant lead and/or team will be
required to participate in NHSTAC meetings.
The consultant should also advise and recommend an appropriate public
and stakeholder consultation which could comprise a Stakeholder Advisory
Committee and/or public consultation events.
Should landowners in the watershed opt to participate in the detailed
boundary delineation process, a separate Committee shall be formed to confirm
the boundary comprised of landowners, Town staff, TRCA staff and Rouge Park
staff.
The study consultants will be required to present the study findings to
at least three Development Services Committee/Council meetings. These
should generally occur upon completion of the mapping exercise for the Town’s
Natural
7.0 STUDY DELIVERABLES AND BUDGET
The consultant team will confirm in their proposal the following set of
deliverables:
Phase 1 Maps, schedules and data base
Preliminary Natural Heritage System mapping including existing natural heritage
features and Natural Heritage System policy layers.
Phase
2a) Detailed Boundary Delineation
Map and Report
Detailed
Mapping product
for the
Phase 2b) - Interim Study Report
Interim Study Report including the mapping, data base and draft policy
framework for new policies (greenbelt conformity, groundwater, agricultural
approach, watershed plan implementation, small streams mapping and policies)
Phase 3 Final Study Report
Final study report to include mapping, data base and policy framework for
consolidation of existing and new policies within the context of an Official
Plan Amendment.
Phase 4 Habitat Monitoring Protocol
Guideline for an ongoing habitat monitoring protocol to assess the
success of the Town’s Natural
The budget shall
separate the following components:
1.
Research and mapping work already completed as part
of the Environmental Policy Review and Consolidation Study (2004).
2.
Additional budget required
to undertake the new scope of work identified in the Environmental Policy
Review and Consolidation Study (Revised) 2007.
3.
Small Stream Study mapping component.
4.
Phase 2a) Detailed Boundary Delineation mapping, delineation
report and Committee meetings.
The consultant shall provide a cost estimate based on a concession size
parcel. All work related to Phase 2
shall be confirmed once the study has commenced and shall be paid as a separate
contract. The Town retains the right to
select detailed evaluation sites. Review
of detailed boundary delineation sites shall be undertaken in partnership with
landowners, TRCA staff and
8.0 WORK
PLAN
The consultants shall
submit a revised work plan reflecting the additional scope of work and schedule
for completion of work.
9.0 STUDY DATA AND
INFORMATION
All study data, reports and presentation material are to be supplied to the
Town in a format compatible with:
Microsoft Office Suite 2000 (Word, Excel, Access and Powerpoint)
ESRI Shape Files, coverages or geodatabases (include projected and geographic
coordinate information)
Autocad Version 2000 and/or Microstation V8
The following reference materials are available for review at the Town of
Markham and will be provided to the consultants chosen to undertake the study:
·
Town of
·
Town of
·
Natural Features Official Plan Amendment for the
Urban Development Area No. 52
·
·
Oak Ridges Moraine Official Plan Amendment No. 117
·
Duffins Watershed Plan, TRCA, (2003)
·
·
·
Rouge North Management Plan (2001)
·
Town of Markham Small Streams Study (2002)
·
Federal Green Space Master Plan (2003)
·
Town of
·
Town of
·
Town of
·
·
Little Rouge Creek Corridor (public lands)
·
Rouge Watershed Plan (draft)
·
Region of
·
Region of
·
Region of
·
Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe Area
·
·
·
Available TRCA site specific fisheries and
terrestrial data
·
Other studies and documents appropriate to the
study review.
The following digital files are available at the Town of
·
Official Plan schedules
·
Natural Features Study mapping
·
·
April 1999 aerial photography (spatially corrected
for DCBM)/April 2001 (spatially incorrect).
In
addition, mapping of natural heritage features and groundwater discharge and
recharge has been undertaken by the
The
study consultants will identify in their study proposal their expectations of
Town staff participation in data collection and inventory work.
10.0 STUDY CONSULTANTS
Completion of the Natural
The
consultants should have a proven ability to facilitate public sessions
involving diverse interests. The consultants will be expected to appear,
in support of, or on behalf of, the Town, at any Ontario Municipal Board
hearings, meetings with public agencies, landowners or the general public.
Costs associated with any OMB hearings or required meetings following
completion of the study, would be determined separately from the study budget,
as required.
The
consultants should articulate the skills and expertise that each member of the
consultant team brings to the proposal. The consultants’ proposal should
provide a description of team participants’ directly relevant experience
expertise and identify how resources can be utilized in the most cost efficient
manner. The proposal should include statements to identify there is no
conflict of interest.
Q:\Development\Planning\MISC\MI4942004EnvironmentalPolicyReview&
Consultation\Reports\ToR 2006.doc