MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING
2007-05-29
All
Members of Council
Development
Services
Chair: Regional Councillor J. Jones
Vice-Chair: Councillor J. Webster
Attendance
Mayor
F. Scarpitti Deputy Mayor J. Jones Regional Councillor J. Heath Regional Councillor T. Wong Regional Councillor G. Landon Councillor V. Burke Councillor E. Shapero Councillor J. Virgilio Councillor C. Moretti Councillor D. Horchik Councillor L. Kanapathi |
V. Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design S. Bordone, Planner S. Heaslip, Senior Planner R. S. Muradali, Planner A. Tari, Committee Clerk |
The Development Services Public Meeting convened at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber with Deputy Mayor J. Jones in the Chair.
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST - None
The Chair advised the subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider a rezoning application to permit a two-storey mixed-use commercial plaza at 8241 Woodbine Avenue, north of Highway 407, east of Woodbine Avenue (ZA 06 134156), submitted by Woodjane Corporation.
The Committee Clerk advised that 24 notices were mailed on
Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposal, the location and surrounding uses. Outstanding issues to be addressed relative to the proposal are the preparation of a traffic impact study and a sanitary sewer capacity study is also required.
Representatives of the owners of Woodjane Corporation were in attendance to respond to questions.
There were no comments from the audience with respect to this application.
Moved
by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
Seconded
by: Councillor L. Kanapathi
That the Development Services Commission report dated April 17, 2007, entitled "Preliminary Report Woodjane Croporation. Rezoning application to permit a two-storey mixed-use commercial plaza at 8241 Woodbine Avenue, located north of Highway 407, east of Woodbine Avenue (ZA 06 134156)" be received;
And that the Record of the Public Meeting held on
And further that the application by Woodjane Corporation to amend By-law 2284-68 be referred back to staff for a report and recommendation.
CARRIED
The Chair advised the subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider a proposed draft plan of subdivision (19TM-02016 - Phase 3) and zoning by-law amendments (SU 02 118676 and ZA 07 108332) submitted by 1039954 Ontario Limited.
The Committee Clerk advised that 46 notices were mailed on
Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposal, the location, surrounding uses. There are no outstanding issues.
Representatives of the owners of 1039954 Ontario Limited were in attendance to respond to questions.
There were no comments from the audience with respect to this application.
Moved
by: Councillor C. Moretti
Seconded
by: Regional Councillor G. Landon
That the Record of the Public Meeting held on May 29, 2007 with respect to applications SU 02 118676 (19TM-02016 – Phase 3) and ZA 07 108332 submitted by 1039954 Ontario Limited for draft plan of subdivision approval and amendments to Zoning By-laws 304-87 and 177-96, be received;
And that draft plan of subdivision 19TM-02016, Phase 3 be referred back to staff for further review and approval under section 2 (b) (iv) of Delegation By-law 2002-202.
And that amendments to Zoning By-laws 304-87 and 177-96 to implement draft plan of subdivision 19TM-02016 – Phase 3 be finalized for enactment.
CARRIED
The Chair advised the subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider a zoning by-law amendment to permit an increase in the maximum number of storeys from 12 to 16, and increase in the maximum number of dwelling units from 400 to 532, and to rezone a portion of the property for a public park, submitted by Times Markham Centre (Majestic Court Condominium)
The Committee Clerk advised that 1347 notices were mailed on
Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposal, the location, surrounding uses. Outstanding issues to be addressed relative to this proposal include the building of a public park with sufficient public exposure and access, height policies of the Markham Centre Secondary Plan, and built form.
Mr. David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, representing Markham Suites Hotel
Limited, spoke
in opposition to the proposal for zoning by-law amendment to permit the
increase in the maximum number of storeys. His concerns related mainly to the proposed
height increase and felt it was not in keeping with the policy direction of
Markham Centre and that the increased height of the building may block the Hilton’s clock
tower. Mr. Bronskill also indicated the
“slab” type building could have adverse impact on existing uses in the area and
on future development.
Staff advised that another
option would be to not increase the height of the approved buildings but
instead add a third, smaller residential building in place of the proposed park
site. The Committee agreed the option of
a public park is a healthier choice for residents and surrounding employees as
opposed to a third concrete building. However,
Committee expressed concerns with respect to the public access and visibility
of the park location. Staff advised that
issues such as park access and public visibility can be dealt with through the
site plan approval process. Staff also
advised discussions with H & R Developments (owners of the lands abutting
the park site) are in progress to consider park entrance alternatives. Committee indicated that the park issues
should be addressed before the By-law is presented to Council for enactment.
The Committee questioned
whether an Official Plan Amendment to the Secondary Plan was required relative
to this application. Bob Crews, J.D.
Barnes Limited, representing Times Markham Centre advised that a Secondary Plan
amendment is not required. Mr. Crews
also advised that the Precinct Plan which was adopted in 2005 does not include
a park, but the Secondary Plan does contemplate a park in this area, and as a
result, they have amended their application accordingly.
The Architect representing
Times Markham Centre advised the Committee that the requested increased height is
marginal relative to the original suggested height and confirmed it will not
block the Hilton Suites’ clock tower.
Committee questioned whether the
proposed By-law would be ready for Council before the summer recess. Staff confirmed that it is not likely that
the park issues can be dealt with before the Council summer recess and the
By-law may not be ready for Council until the Fall.
Moved
by: Councillor E. Shapero
Seconded
by: Councillor C. Moretti
That the deputation by David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP regarding the
proposed zoning by-law amendment with respect to increase in permitted building
height and an increase in permitted number of dwelling units, be received;
That the staff report dated May 1, 2007, entitled “PRELIMINARY REPORT –
Times Markham Centre (Majestic Court Condominium) – North-west corner of South
Town Centre Boulevard and Clegg Road – Application for zoning by-law amendment
to permit an increase in the maximum number of storeys from 12 to 16, and
increase in the maximum number of dwelling units from 400 to 532, and to rezone
a portion of the property for a public park” be received;
And that the Record of the Public Meeting held on May 29, 2007 with
respect to the proposed amendment to By-law 2004-196, as amended, be received;
And that the application by Times Markham Centre to amend By-law
2004-196 as amended, be approved;
And further that the proposed amendment to By-law 2004-196, as amended,
be enacted without further notice, upon resolution of the identified park
issues.
CARRIED
The Chair advised the subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider a zoning by-law amendment to permit 3 residential apartment buildings with a total of 319 units, 34 Main Street Unionville (ZA 06-120486, submitted by Co-Operators Development Corporation.
The Committee Clerk advised that 1663 notices were mailed on
Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposal, the location,
surrounding uses and outstanding issues. Staff advised a Community Information Meeting
was held on
Mr. Vijay Sappani addressed Council on the proposed zoning By-law amendment stating the development of condominiums will take away the historical value of Unionville. Mr. Sappani also stated the increase in traffic will negatively impact the quality of life for the residents in Unionville.
Mr. Richard Talbot read a prepared text on behalf of Mr. Harry
Eaglesham. He is supportive of the
amendment to reduce the height of the buildings fronting on to Main Street
although is concerned with the impact the development will have on the Main
Street south beautification plan. He
also suggested the proposed roadway emptying on
Mr. Richard Talbot addressed Council on the proposed zoning By-law
amendment stating he has two areas of concern, namely, the increased traffic on
Mr. Pres Harrison addressed Council on the proposed zoning By-law
amendment stating he was concerned with the increased traffic on
Ms. Gail Leroux addressed Council on the proposed zoning By-law
amendment stating she is not supportive of the high density on
The Committee expressed a number of concerns including that the
proposed amendment should not set a precedent for other applications coming
forward in the Main Street Unionville area.
Other areas of concerns discussed were:
traffic levels on
Mr.
The Committee suggested the proposed development be reconfigured to
include a block of townhouses facing on
Moved
by: Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded
by: Councillor J. Virgilio
That the Development Services Commission report dated October 3, 2006 entitled "Co-operators Development Corp. Application for Zoning Amendment to permit 3 residential apartment buildings with a total of 319 units, 34 Main Street Unionville, Markham Centre, ZA. 06-120486" be received;
And that the record of the Public Meeting held on
And further that the application by Co-operators Development Corp. for Zoning By-law amendment be referred back to staff for a report and recommendation.
And further that the application be referred to the Unionville Sub-Committee.
CARRIED
ADJOURNMENT
The Development Services Public
Meeting adjourned at the hour of