MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COMMITTEE
2007-09-18
All
Members of Council
Development Services Economic
Development
Chair: Regional
Councillor J. Jones Chair: Regional Councillor T. Wong
Vice-Chair: Councillor
J. Webster Transportation Issues
Chair: Regional Councillor G. Landon
PART B
Report Agenda
Attendance
Mayor F. Scarpitti Deputy Mayor J. Jones Regional Councillor J. Heath Regional Councillor G. Landon Councillor V. Burke Councillor E. Shapero Councillor J. Virgilio Councillor C. Moretti Councillor J. Webster Councillor D. Horchik Councillor L. Kanapathi Councillor A. Chiu |
J. Livey, Chief Administrative Officer J. Baird, Commissioner of Development Services A. Taylor, Commissioner of Corporate Services S. Bordone, Planner C. Conrad, Town Solicitor G. Duncan, Heritage Planner R. Hutcheson, Manager, Heritage Planning R. V. Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design A. Tari, Committee Clerk |
The
Development Services Committee convened at the hour of
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
None disclosed.
Hugh Allison, Firefighter, Fire & Emergency Services – 20 years
Donato Capozzi, Labourer/Driver, Operations – 20 years
Leo Panzarella, Waterworks Operator II, Operations – 20 years
Andy Taylor, Commissioner, Corporate Services – 15 years
Garry Hale, Building Inspector II, Building Standards – 10 years
Alexander Chan, Provincial Offences Officer II, By-laws & Licensing Division – 5 years
Steve Dahan, Truck Driver, Operations – 5 years
Raj Raman, Manager, Accounting and Expenditure Control, Financial Services – 5 years
Alex Spasewski, Provincial Offences Officer II, By-laws & Licensing Division – 5 years
Sabrina Bordone, Planner II, Planning & Urban Design – 3 years
Frank Caswell, Truck Driver, Operations – 3 years
Trevor Frizzle, Facility Operator I, Recreation Services, Crosby C.C. – 3 years
Laura Gold, Assistant to Council/Committee – Clerk’s – 3 years
Scott Greer, Facility Operator II, Recreation Services, Milliken Mills C.C. – 3 years
Dan Jones, Facility Operator I, Recreation Services, Angus Glen C.C. – 3 years
Ken Karges, Lead, Service Management, Information Technology Services – 3 years
Ryan O’Reilly, Gardener, Operations – 3 years
Paul Willis, Sign Maintenance, Operations – 3 years
Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That the minutes of the Development Services Committee meeting, Part B, held September 4, 2007, be confirmed.
CARRIED
Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That the minutes of
the Development Services Public Meeting, held
CARRIED
Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That Committee receive the report
entitled “Report on Incoming
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That Council be advised that in
accordance with Delegation By-law 2002-202, and additional site specific
delegations authorized by the Development Services Committee, the Commissioner
of Development Services or the Director of
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That pursuant to the Conservation
Review Board recommendation dated June 6, 2007, Council enact a by-law
designating the Abraham Reesor House at 7265 Highway 7, under Part IV of the Ontario
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That the Development Services
Committee Report titled, “Status Report: Yonge Steeles Corridor Study”, dated
And that the study proceed as outlined in this report.
CARRIED
Mr. Barry Nelson,
Mr. George Jenkyn,
The applicant, Mr. Carmen Naccarato, addressed the Committee
with respect to the demolition permit application for
The Committee asked if a second building could be added to the property without applying for a severance. Staff advised the current zoning allows for only one dwelling per lot and therefore, an application for a zoning amendment or minor variance would have to be submitted.
Mr. Bill Wylie,
Ms. Evelin Ellison,
Ms. Marion Matthias,
The Committee questioned whether there was an opportunity for other actions by the applicant if Council denies the demolition permit application. Staff advised the applicant has the opportunity to appeal the decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. Staff also advised that the demolition application is deemed approved if Council does not make a decision within 90 days.
The Committee asked about what would happen if Mr. Naccarato withdrew his current application for a demolition permit and submitted an application for zoning amendment. Specifically, they questioned whether or not Mr. Naccarato would be allowed to re-submit a demolition permit in the event he was not satisfied with Council’s decision on his zoning amendment application. Staff indicated they were not certain if the Act would permit Mr. Naccarato to take such actions.
The Committee asked Mr. Naccarato if he would considering appealing Council’s decision to deny the approval of the demolition permit application. Mr. Naccarato advised that he will not appeal the decision if he is allowed the opportunity to build a second dwelling on the property.
Moved by: Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded by: Councillor C. Moretti
That the minutes
of the Thornhill Sub-Committee meeting, held
And that the applicant work together with Town staff and the community
and submit the necessary applications and work together with Town staff and the
community on the following options:
(1) to allow for construction of a second dwelling on the property and
a list of appropriate compatible uses for the heritage structure, including
possible continuation of residential use; and,
(2) to consider a possible severance of the property, through Committee
of Adjustment to allow an appropriate sized lot for the heritage building and
the remainder of the lot for a new dwelling;
And that the Demolition
Permit Application 07 113524 DP for
And that it be noted
that Mr. Naccarato agreed with the above process and voluntarily agreed to
suspend the 90 day review period specified in the Ontario Heritage Act;
And that the property owner be notified of the decision to defer the demolition permit application;
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
The
Committee expressed concerns that if the constituents do not appreciate having
the Highway renamed that staff should not spend a lot of time on the
issue. The Committee agreed to leave it
to the Regional Municipality of York to do the public consultations regarding
street name options.
Moved by: Councillor J. Webster
Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu
That the report entitled
“Renaming of Highway 7”, dated
And that the Town of Markham request the Region of York to consider options for renaming the section of Highway 7 within the Town of Markham under the Region’s jurisdiction from “Highway 7” to a name more representative of an urban arterial road than a Provincial Highway;
And that the Region consult with other York Region municipalities (Vaughan and Richmond Hill) and adjacent Regions and municipalities that also have Highway 7 frontage, and with the public and area businesses;
And that Council rely
on the Region’s public consultation process regarding street name options;
And further that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
Report Attachments Appendix A B
Richard
Librach from Richard Librach Architect Inc. distributed pictures of the
proposed office building structure.
The
Committee questioned if the applicant would consider a use of a more of a permeable surface in the
parking area to allow water to permeate into the soil. Mr. Librach advised that their landscape
consultant felt the opportunity was not appropriate for this site. The Committee suggested the applicant work
with Town staff to come up with other options for permeable surfaces and to
soften the current building design so that it is more amenable to the residents
on the north side of the street.
Ms. Evelyn
Ellison,
Moved by: Councilor V. Burke
Seconded by: Councilor E. Shapero
That the staff report entitled “Applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval to permit business and professional offices at 107-111 Glen Cameron Road, Hunter Corporation, ZA 05 023385 & SC 05 023455” be received;
And that the Zoning By-law
Amendment application (ZA 05 023385) to amend By-law 2237, as
amended, submitted by Hunster Corporation to permit business and professional
offices at 107-111 Glen Cameron Road, be approved and the draft Zoning By-law
Amendment attached as Appendix ‘A’ be finalized and enacted;
And that the applicant work with Town staff to consider the use of
permeable surfaces;
And that Town staff follow up with the Engineering Department with
respect to the possible establishment of a designated bicycle route in the
subject area;
And that the Site
Plan Control Application (SC 05 023455) submitted by Hunster Corporation to
permit business and professional offices at
And that site plan approval be delegated to the
Director of Planning and Urban Design or her designate, to be issued following
execution of a site plan agreement. Site
Plan approval is issued only when the Director has signed the site plan
“approved”.
CARRIED
Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposal. The Committee stated concerns with respect to
the original targeted unit counts of 10,000 and questioned if there will be
enough community amenities such as parks, community centres, etc. if these
counts continue to increase. The
Committee also suggested staff look at the VIVA line through Markham Centre and
to continue on through Highway 7. The
Committee suggested that staff should be clear on what the requirements are
with respect to increasing building heights in Markham Centre.
Moved by: Councillor J. Virgilio
Seconded by: Councillor D. Horchik
That Council affirm the original vision for Markham Centre as a human-scale, pedestrian-oriented, transit-supportive, major activity centre for the Town, in particular the height policies contained within the Markham Centre Secondary Plan (OPA 21), which call for a mid-rise community, with taller building elements concentrated around strategic “landmark” locations identified in the Plan;
And that staff review the available community amenities, park land distribution and road pattern;
And that staff be directed to review the Markham Centre Secondary Plan’s height policies, including specific design criteria relating to taller buildings at “landmark” locations;
That staff be directed to up-date
the Markham Centre Secondary Plan’s Appendix ‘I’ – Central Area Statistics to
reflect Precinct Plans and development applications approved by Council;
And that staff be directed to up-date the land use and other schedules within the Markham Centre Secondary Plan, to reflect Precinct Plans and development approvals, identified school and park locations, and established road alignments;
And that a public meeting be held, following completion of a draft Secondary Plan Amendment, to consider the Amendment;
And that the draft Secondary Plan
Amendment be reviewed by the Markham Centre Advisory Group;
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
Report Presentation Attachments Appendix A
Staff gave
a presentation regarding the proposal.
The Committee suggested that staff work with the Town of
Mr. Roger
Beaman, Thomson, Rogers, solicitor for Condor Properties Ltd., addressed the
Committee on the proposed application and stated that his clients understand
the financial commitment outlined in the report and are ready to finalize it
with Town staff. Mr. Beaman suggested
that staff include into their development principles the notion of a high modal
split.
The
Committee questioned if outside consultants will be hired. Staff advised that a three year contract
position is required, in addition to a consulting team, and the position will
be funded by the landowners through Development Charges. The Committee stated concerns with respect to
who the new staff person would report to.
Staff assured Committee that the contract person will report directly to
the Director of
Moved by: Councillor V. Burke
Seconded by: Councillor E. Shapero
That the report entitled “Town Initiated Official Plan Amendment, Development Principles for the Langstaff Area, and Initiation of a Master Plan and Secondary Plan Amendment Process for the Langstaff Area, File SD 03 – 116189” be received;
And that a Public Meeting be held to consider the Official Plan amendment (attached as Appendix ‘A’) to identify in the Markham Official Plan that the Langstaff Area is part of an Urban Growth Centre (Richmond Hill/Langstaff Gateway Urban Growth Centre) in the context of the Provincial Growth Plan;
And that Town staff be authorized
to initiate a process, as outlined in this report, to prepare a Master Plan and
a Secondary Plan amendment for the Langstaff area, in consultation with the
Thornhill Sub-committee (comprised of
Mayor Scarpitti ex officio, Deputy Mayor Jones, Regional Councillor
Heath and Councillors Burke and Shapero) and area landowners and that staff consider creating an
Advisory Committee;
And that a Request for Pre-Qualification to select a short list of qualified consultants to be invited to submit detailed proposals to undertake the preparation of a Master Plan for the Langstaff Area be developed, in accordance with the Town’s Purchasing By-law;
And that the Langstaff Land Owners provide financial security, to the satisfaction of the Town Treasurer, prior to the award of the contract to the successful consultant team;
And that a capital budget be established for the preparation of the Langstaff Area Master and Secondary Plan process, to be financed by the Langstaff Land Owners;
And that staff report back with the necessary credit agreement, to be executed with the Langstaff Land Owners, for the financing of the Master Plan and Secondary Plan Amendment preparation process, subject to the passage of a Development Charge By-law;
And that staff, in consultation with the Thornhill
Sub-committee, report back to Development Services Committee on recommended consultant
selection and the recommended Master Plan Study process and timelines,
including the public consultation process;
And that staff update Development Services Committee on the status of the Master Plan and related studies on a regular basis;
And that Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
Moved by:
Councillor J. Virgilio
Seconded by: Councillor L. Kanapathi
Letter from the Ministry of Transportation, dated August 9, 2007, advising that the Ministry will be undertaking a full inspection of all steel deck truss bridges on the provincial highway system, and encouraging municipalities to do the same.
CARRIED
Moved by: Councillor J. Virgilio
Seconded by: Councillor L. Kanapathi
Letter from Mr. G. and Ms. E. Lillie, dated
CARRIED
Moved by: Councillor J. Virgilio
Seconded by: Councillor L. Kanapathi
Letter from Mr. R. Watt, dated
CARRIED
Moved by:
Councillor J. Virgilio
Seconded by: Councillor L. Kanapathi
Letter from Mr. M. Gordon, dated
CARRIED
The Committee asked staff about the Yonge Street Environmental Assessment and what conditions are required to re-develop and/or re-zone to ensure additional subway stops are included. Staff advised they will follow up with the Director of Engineering and the Director of Planning.
ADJOURNMENT
The
Development Services Committee meeting adjourned at the hour of